• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

描述性分析 1991-2012 年发表的口腔健康系统评价:横断面研究。

A descriptive analysis of oral health systematic reviews published 1991-2012: cross sectional study.

机构信息

Orthodontic Graduate Program, School of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e74545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074545. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0074545
PMID:24098657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3787021/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify all systematic reviews (SRs) published in the domain of oral health research and describe them in terms of their epidemiological and descriptive characteristics.

DESIGN

Cross sectional, descriptive study.

METHODS

An electronic search of seven databases was performed from inception through May 2012; bibliographies of relevant publications were also reviewed. Studies were considered for inclusion if they were oral health SRs defined as therapeutic or non-therapeutic investigations that studied a topic or an intervention related to dental, oral or craniofacial diseases/disorders. Data were extracted from all the SRs based on a number of epidemiological and descriptive characteristics. Data were analysed descriptively for all the SRs, within each of the nine dental specialities, and for Cochrane and non-Cochrane SRs separately.

RESULTS

1,188 oral health (126 Cochrane and 1062 non-Cochrane) SRs published from 1991 through May 2012 were identified, encompassing the nine dental specialties. Over half (n = 676; 56.9%) of the SRs were published in specialty oral health journals, with almost all (n = 1,178; 99.2%) of the SRs published in English and almost none of the non-Cochrane SRs (n = 11; 0.9%) consisting of updates of previously published SRs. 75.3% of the SRs were categorized as therapeutic, with 64.5% examining non-drug interventions, while approximately half (n = 150/294; 51%) of the non-therapeutic SRs were classified as epidemiological SRs. The SRs included a median of 15 studies, with a meta-analysis conducted in 43.6%, in which a median of 9 studies/1 randomized trial were included in the largest meta-analysis conducted. Funding was received for 25.1% of the SRs, including nearly three-quarters (n = 96; 76.2%) of the Cochrane SRs.

CONCLUSION

Epidemiological and descriptive characteristics of the 1,188 oral health SRs varied across the nine dental specialties and by SR category (Cochrane vs. non-Cochrane). There is a clear need for more updates of SRs in all the dental specialties.

摘要

目的

确定口腔健康研究领域发表的所有系统评价(SR),并从流行病学和描述性特征方面对其进行描述。

设计

横断面、描述性研究。

方法

从 1991 年至 2012 年 5 月,对 7 个数据库进行了电子检索,并对相关出版物的参考文献进行了综述。如果研究是关于与牙齿、口腔或颌面疾病/障碍相关的主题或干预措施的治疗或非治疗性调查,则将其视为口腔健康 SR 进行考虑。从所有 SR 中提取基于若干流行病学和描述性特征的数据。对所有 SR 进行描述性分析,对 9 个牙科专业领域内的每一个进行分析,并对 Cochrane 和非 Cochrane SR 分别进行分析。

结果

从 1991 年至 2012 年 5 月,共确定了 1188 篇口腔健康(126 篇 Cochrane 和 1062 篇非 Cochrane)SR,涵盖了 9 个牙科专业领域。超过一半(n=676;56.9%)的 SR 发表在专业口腔健康期刊上,几乎所有(n=1178;99.2%)SR 都是用英语发表的,而且几乎没有非 Cochrane SR(n=11;0.9%)是对之前发表的 SR 的更新。75.3%的 SR 被归类为治疗性,其中 64.5%的研究是非药物干预,而大约一半(n=150/294;51%)的非治疗性 SR 被归类为流行病学 SR。SR 中位数包含 15 项研究,其中 43.6%进行了荟萃分析,在最大的荟萃分析中,中位数包含 9 项研究/1 项随机试验。25.1%的 SR 获得了资助,其中包括近四分之三(n=96;76.2%)的 Cochrane SR。

结论

在 9 个牙科专业领域和 SR 类别(Cochrane 与非 Cochrane)之间,1188 篇口腔健康 SR 的流行病学和描述性特征存在差异。所有牙科专业领域都需要更多的 SR 更新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f07/3787021/c56b2bdfec04/pone.0074545.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f07/3787021/ded1158f9125/pone.0074545.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f07/3787021/942d27a6aff0/pone.0074545.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f07/3787021/c56b2bdfec04/pone.0074545.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f07/3787021/ded1158f9125/pone.0074545.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f07/3787021/942d27a6aff0/pone.0074545.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f07/3787021/c56b2bdfec04/pone.0074545.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A descriptive analysis of oral health systematic reviews published 1991-2012: cross sectional study.描述性分析 1991-2012 年发表的口腔健康系统评价:横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e74545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074545. eCollection 2013.
2
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.系统评价的流行病学及报告特征
PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078.
3
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of non-Cochrane updates of systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study.系统评价非 Cochrane 更新的流行病学和报告特征:一项横断面研究。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 May;11(3):471-483. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1409. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
4
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.生物医学研究系统评价的流行病学及报告特征:一项横断面研究
PLoS Med. 2016 May 24;13(5):e1002028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028. eCollection 2016 May.
5
Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources.综合儿童健康证据的综述发表情况(PORSCHE):一项针对作者的调查,以确定与在Cochrane及非Cochrane来源发表相关的因素。
Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 21;5(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0276-7.
6
A descriptive analysis of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014.2014 年发表的非 Cochrane 儿童相关系统评价的描述性分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 1;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0562-2.
7
[Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].[1991年至2000年期间荷兰系统评价数量增加]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Nov 8;147(45):2226-30.
8
Systematic Reviews in Dental Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Contribution from Indian Dentists During 1948-2022.牙科研究中的系统评价:1948 - 2022年印度牙医贡献的文献计量分析
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Oct 31;12(5):571-576. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_127_22. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
9
A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.对 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中与儿童相关的系统评价的描述性分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2010 May 20;10:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-34.
10
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.系统评价治疗抑郁症方法学质量的横断面研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):619-627. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000208. Epub 2017 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Statistical Heterogeneity in Oral Health Meta-Analyses.口腔健康荟萃分析中的统计学异质性。
J Dent Res. 2025 May;104(5):481-488. doi: 10.1177/00220345251316279. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
2
Development and validation of a search strategy and an automated classifier for retrieving temporomandibular disorders studies.用于检索颞下颌关节紊乱症研究的检索策略和自动分类器的开发与验证
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2024 Jun;38(2):74-81. doi: 10.22514/jofph.2024.015. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
3
Systematic Reviews in Dental Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Contribution from Indian Dentists During 1948-2022.

本文引用的文献

1
An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs).补充和替代医学系统评价(SRs)的流行病学和报告特征评估。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053536. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
2
Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic-related systematic reviews.修复治疗相关系统评价的方法学质量和描述特征。
J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Apr;40(4):263-78. doi: 10.1111/joor.12028. Epub 2013 Jan 19.
3
Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
牙科研究中的系统评价:1948 - 2022年印度牙医贡献的文献计量分析
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Oct 31;12(5):571-576. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_127_22. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
4
Prediction intervals reporting in orthodontic meta-analyses.正畸荟萃分析中预测区间的报告。
Eur J Orthod. 2021 Oct 4;43(5):596-600. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab037.
5
Assessing the roles and challenges of librarians in dental systematic and scoping reviews.评估图书馆员在牙科系统评价和范围综述中的作用与挑战。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;109(1):52-61. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1031.
6
Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry.方案注册可提高牙科学系统评价报告质量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Mar 11;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00939-7.
7
Identifying and critically examining government legislation relevant to children's dental caries in Calgary, Alberta, Canada: a health inequities lens.从健康不平等视角识别和批判性审视加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里市与儿童龋齿相关的政府立法。
J Public Health Dent. 2019 Mar;79(2):137-146. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12305. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
8
Influence of blinding on treatment effect size estimate in randomized controlled trials of oral health interventions.盲法对口腔健康干预措施随机对照试验治疗效果估计的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 May 18;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0491-0.
9
Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955-2013.牙科领域的随机临床试验:1955年至2013年间的偏倚风险、随机误差风险、报告质量和方法学质量
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):e0190089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190089. eCollection 2017.
10
The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews.根据GRADE标准,口腔健康系统评价中的证据质量主要为低质量或极低质量。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0131644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131644. eCollection 2015.
主流正畸学期刊中的 Cochrane 系统评价与非 Cochrane 系统评价:质量典范?
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Apr;35(2):244-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs016. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
4
Fluoride supplements (tablets, drops, lozenges or chewing gums) for preventing dental caries in children.用于预防儿童龋齿的氟化物补充剂(片剂、滴剂、含片或口香糖)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD007592. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007592.pub2.
5
Bias in systematic reviews?系统评价中的偏倚?
J Orthod. 2011 Sep;38(3):158-60. doi: 10.1179/14653121141407.
6
Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics.正畸领域系统评价方法学和质量特征评估。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011 Aug;14(3):116-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01522.x.
7
A systematic review of orofacial pain in patients receiving cancer therapy.癌症治疗患者的口腔颌面部疼痛的系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Aug;18(8):1023-31. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0897-7. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
8
A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.对 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中与儿童相关的系统评价的描述性分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2010 May 20;10:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-34.
9
Critically appraising systematic reviews.批判性评价系统评价。
Evid Based Dent. 2010;11(1):27-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400710.
10
Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?报告显著结果的研究更有可能被发表吗?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.024.