Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0202, USA.
Evodevo. 2013 Oct 7;4(1):27. doi: 10.1186/2041-9139-4-27.
The question of whether the ancestral bilaterian had a central nervous system (CNS) or a diffuse ectodermal nervous system has been hotly debated. Considerable evidence supports the theory that a CNS evolved just once. However, an alternative view proposes that the chordate CNS evolved from the ectodermal nerve net of a hemichordate-like ancestral deuterostome, implying independent evolution of the CNS in chordates and protostomes. To specify morphological divisions along the anterior/posterior axis, this ancestor used gene networks homologous to those patterning three organizing centers in the vertebrate brain: the anterior neural ridge, the zona limitans intrathalamica and the isthmic organizer, and subsequent evolution of the vertebrate brain involved elaboration of these ancestral signaling centers; however, all or part of these signaling centers were lost from the CNS of invertebrate chordates. The present review analyzes the evidence for and against these theories. The bulk of the evidence indicates that a CNS evolved just once - in the ancestral bilaterian. Importantly, in both protostomes and deuterostomes, the CNS represents a portion of a generally neurogenic ectoderm that is internalized and receives and integrates inputs from sensory cells in the remainder of the ectoderm. The expression patterns of genes involved in medio/lateral (dorso/ventral) patterning of the CNS are similar in protostomes and chordates; however, these genes are not similarly expressed in the ectoderm outside the CNS. Thus, their expression is a better criterion for CNS homologs than the expression of anterior/posterior patterning genes, many of which (for example, Hox genes) are similarly expressed both in the CNS and in the remainder of the ectoderm in many bilaterians. The evidence leaves hemichordates in an ambiguous position - either CNS centralization was lost to some extent at the base of the hemichordates, or even earlier, at the base of the hemichordates + echinoderms, or one of the two hemichordate nerve cords is homologous to the CNS of protostomes and chordates. In any event, the presence of part of the genetic machinery for the anterior neural ridge, the zona limitans intrathalamica and the isthmic organizer in invertebrate chordates together with similar morphology indicates that these organizers were present, at least in part, at the base of the chordates and were probably elaborated upon in the vertebrate lineage.
关于祖后生动物是否具有中枢神经系统 (CNS) 或弥散外胚层神经系统的问题一直存在争议。大量证据支持 CNS 仅进化一次的理论。然而,另一种观点认为,脊索动物的 CNS 是从半索动物样后生动物的外胚层神经网进化而来的,这意味着 CNS 在脊索动物和原口动物中的独立进化。为了指定沿前后轴的形态学划分,这个祖先进化出了与那些在脊椎动物大脑中模式化三个组织中心的基因网络同源的基因网络:前神经嵴、丘脑限内区和峡部组织者,随后脊椎动物大脑的进化涉及对这些祖先信号中心的详细阐述;然而,这些信号中心的全部或部分已从无脊椎脊索动物的 CNS 中丢失。本综述分析了支持和反对这些理论的证据。大量证据表明,CNS 仅进化了一次——在祖后生动物中。重要的是,在原口动物和后生动物中,CNS 代表了通常神经生成的外胚层的一部分,该部分被内化并接收和整合来自外胚层其余部分的感觉细胞的输入。参与 CNS 中/侧(背/腹)模式形成的基因的表达模式在原口动物和脊索动物中相似;然而,这些基因在外胚层中 CNS 以外的表达并不相似。因此,它们的表达是 CNS 同源物的更好标准,而不是前/后模式形成基因的表达,其中许多基因(例如,Hox 基因)在许多后生动物的 CNS 和外胚层其余部分中均有相似的表达。证据使半索动物处于不确定的位置——半索动物的 CNS 集中程度在半索动物的基部或更早的半索动物+棘皮动物基部有所降低,或者两个半索动物神经索中的一个与原口动物和脊索动物的 CNS 同源。无论如何,无脊椎脊索动物中存在前部神经嵴、丘脑限内区和峡部组织者的部分遗传机制以及类似的形态学表明,这些组织者至少在一定程度上存在于脊索动物的基部,并且可能在脊椎动物谱系中得到了进一步发展。