Garczynski Amy M, Waldrop Jessica S, Rupprecht Elizabeth A, Grawitch Matthew J
Department of Psychology.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Oct;18(4):417-29. doi: 10.1037/a0033988.
Research on the work-life interface does not specifically account for how individuals cognitively conceptualize their work and nonwork lives in terms of the differentiation between work and nonwork self-aspects. In addition, no cross-cultural research examines self-concept differentiation in conjunction with employee outcomes of presenteeism and engagement, pointing to a need to study these relationships cross-culturally. Results of the current study revealed cultural differences in self-concept differentiation, engagement, mental presenteeism, and physical presenteeism. Indian participants reported lower levels of differentiation and higher levels of engagement, mental presenteeism, and physical presenteeism than American participants. Nationality interacted with self-concept differentiation to predict mental presenteeism, physical presenteeism, and engagement. Among Indian participants, self-concept differentiation did not impact scores on the other variables. However, among American participants, those lower in differentiation reported greater engagement, lower mental presenteeism, and lower physical presenteeism. These results have important implications for the study of the work-life interface, and they provide evidence that engagement and presenteeism may be culturally contingent.
关于工作与生活界面的研究并未特别说明个体如何从工作自我方面与非工作自我方面的差异来认知性地构建其工作和非工作生活。此外,尚无跨文化研究结合员工出勤主义和敬业度的结果来考察自我概念分化,这表明有必要进行跨文化研究这些关系。本研究结果揭示了自我概念分化、敬业度、心理出勤主义和身体出勤主义方面的文化差异。印度参与者报告的分化水平低于美国参与者,而敬业度、心理出勤主义和身体出勤主义水平则高于美国参与者。国籍与自我概念分化相互作用,以预测心理出勤主义、身体出勤主义和敬业度。在印度参与者中,自我概念分化并未影响其他变量的得分。然而,在美国参与者中,分化程度较低的人报告的敬业度更高,心理出勤主义和身体出勤主义更低。这些结果对工作与生活界面的研究具有重要意义,并且它们提供了证据表明敬业度和出勤主义可能因文化而异。