• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生使用不同心血管风险评估策略的情况:一项定性研究。

General practitioners' use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Screening and Test Evaluation Program, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2013 Oct 7;199(7):485-9. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10133.

DOI:10.5694/mja13.10133
PMID:24099210
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors that influence the extent to which general practitioners use absolute risk (AR) assessment in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured interviews with 25 currently practising GPs from eight Divisions of General Practice in New South Wales, Australia, between October 2011 and May 2012. Data were analysed using framework analysis.

RESULTS

The study identified five strategies that GPs use with patients in different situations, defined in terms of the extent to which AR was used and the reasons given for this: the AR-focused strategy, used when AR assessment was considered useful for the patient; the AR-adjusted strategy, used to account for additional risk factors such as family history; the clinical judgement strategy, used when GPs considered that their judgement took multiple risk factors into account as effectively as AR; the passive disregard strategy, used when GPs lacked sufficient time, access or experience to use AR; and the active disregard strategy, used when AR was considered to be inappropriate for the patient. The strategies were linked with different opportunity, capability and motivation barriers to the use of AR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an in-depth insight into the factors that influence GPs' use of AR in CVD risk assessment. The results suggest that GPs use a range of strategies in different situations, so different approaches may be required to improve the use of AR guidelines in practice.

摘要

目的

确定影响全科医生在心血管疾病(CVD)风险评估中使用绝对风险(AR)评估程度的因素。

设计、地点和参与者:2011 年 10 月至 2012 年 5 月,对澳大利亚新南威尔士州 8 个普通科医生分部的 25 名现任全科医生进行半结构式访谈。使用框架分析对数据进行分析。

结果

该研究确定了全科医生在不同情况下与患者使用的五种策略,这些策略根据使用 AR 的程度和给出的原因来定义:AR 重点策略,用于 AR 评估对患者有用的情况;AR 调整策略,用于考虑家族史等其他风险因素;临床判断策略,用于全科医生认为他们的判断能够像 AR 一样有效地考虑多个风险因素;被动忽视策略,用于全科医生缺乏足够的时间、途径或经验来使用 AR;以及主动忽视策略,用于 AR 被认为不适合患者的情况。这些策略与使用 AR 的机会、能力和动机障碍有关。

结论

本研究深入了解了影响全科医生在 CVD 风险评估中使用 AR 的因素。结果表明,全科医生在不同情况下使用多种策略,因此可能需要不同的方法来提高 AR 指南在实践中的应用。

相似文献

1
General practitioners' use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies: a qualitative study.全科医生使用不同心血管风险评估策略的情况:一项定性研究。
Med J Aust. 2013 Oct 7;199(7):485-9. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10133.
2
Factors influencing general practitioners' decisions about cardiovascular disease risk reassessment: findings from experimental and interview studies.影响全科医生进行心血管疾病风险重新评估决策的因素:实验研究与访谈研究的结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 5;17:107. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0499-7.
3
Communicating cardiovascular disease risk: an interview study of General Practitioners' use of absolute risk within tailored communication strategies.沟通心血管疾病风险:一项关于全科医生在个性化沟通策略中使用绝对风险的访谈研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 May 29;15:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-106.
4
General practitioners' perceptions of population based bowel screening and their influence on practice: a qualitative study.全科医生对基于人群的肠道筛查的认知及其对医疗实践的影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 15;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0610-8.
5
General practitioner views on the determinants of test ordering: a theory-based qualitative approach to the development of an intervention to improve immunoglobulin requests in primary care.全科医生对检查开单决定因素的看法:一种基于理论的定性方法,用于开发一项改善基层医疗中免疫球蛋白申请的干预措施。
Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 19;11(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0465-8.
6
Using Classification and Regression Trees (CART) to Identify Prescribing Thresholds for Cardiovascular Disease.使用分类与回归树(CART)来确定心血管疾病的处方阈值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Feb;34(2):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0342-3.
7
Lessons from the failure of implementing the 'Better Care Better Value' prescribing indicator for renin-angiotensin system drugs in England: a qualitative study of general practitioners' perceptions using behavioural change framework.从英国实施“更好的护理更好的价值”血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂处方指标失败中吸取的教训:使用行为改变框架对全科医生认知的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 23;10(6):e035910. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035910.
8
Urban Australian general practitioners' perceptions of falls risk screening, falls risk assessment, and referral practices for falls prevention: an exploratory cross-sectional survey study.澳大利亚城市全科医生对跌倒风险筛查、跌倒风险评估及跌倒预防转诊实践的看法:一项探索性横断面调查研究
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):111-119. doi: 10.1071/AH15152.
9
Advance care planning in rural New South Wales from the perspective of general practice registrars and recently fellowed general practitioners.从全科医生住院医师和近期获得资格的全科医生的角度看新南威尔士州农村地区的预立医疗计划。
Aust J Rural Health. 2019 Oct;27(5):398-404. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12525. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
10
Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Preventive Cardiovascular Medication: Barriers and Enablers for Patients and General Practitioners.停用潜在不适当的预防性心血管药物:患者和全科医生面临的障碍与促进因素
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Jun;50(6):446-54. doi: 10.1177/1060028016637181. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Practicality of a patient self-assessment checklist to manage dementia risk factors in GP practices.患者自我评估清单在全科医疗诊所管理痴呆风险因素中的实用性。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 16;15(1):17064. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01455-8.
2
General practitioners' assessment and management of chronic kidney disease in older patients- a mixed methods study.全科医生对老年患者慢性肾脏病的评估和管理——一项混合方法研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 20;25(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02559-2.
3
Implementing decision aids for cardiovascular disease prevention: stakeholder interviews and case studies in Australian primary care.
实施心血管疾病预防决策辅助工具:澳大利亚初级保健中的利益相关者访谈和案例研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Feb 3;25(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02258-4.
4
Implementing patient decision aids into general practice clinical decision support systems: Feasibility study in cardiovascular disease prevention.将患者决策辅助工具纳入全科医疗临床决策支持系统:心血管疾病预防的可行性研究
PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 21;2:100140. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100140. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
"I can't do it": A qualitative study exploring case and contact experiences with COVID-19 contact tracing.“我做不到”:一项定性研究,探讨了与 COVID-19 接触者追踪相关的案例和接触者的经验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):1963. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14265-8.
6
Risk assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases before statin therapy initiation: Knowledge, attitude, and practice of physicians in Yemen.启动他汀类药物治疗前的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险评估:也门医生的知识、态度和实践。
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0269002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269002. eCollection 2022.
7
Findings and lessons learnt implementing a cardiovascular disease quality improvement program in Australian primary care: a mixed method evaluation.在澳大利亚初级保健中实施心血管疾病质量改进计划的发现和经验教训:混合方法评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 26;22(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07310-6.
8
Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on Using Automated HIV Risk Prediction Models to Identify Potential Candidates for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis.初级保健提供者对使用自动化 HIV 风险预测模型识别潜在暴露前预防候选者的看法。
AIDS Behav. 2021 Nov;25(11):3651-3657. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03252-6. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
9
Cross-sectional survey describing general practitioners' absolute cardiovascular disease risk assessment practices and their relationship to knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about cardiovascular disease risk in Queensland, Australia.描述澳大利亚昆士兰州全科医生进行心血管疾病绝对风险评估的实践情况及其与心血管疾病风险知识、态度和信念之间关系的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 13;10(8):e033859. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033859.
10
Factors influencing the implementation of cardiovascular risk scoring in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review.影响基层医疗中心血管风险评分实施的因素:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 20;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01022-x.