• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过改善健康来提高员工生产力。

Improving employee productivity through improved health.

机构信息

From OptumHealth, Golden Valley, Minn.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Oct;55(10):1142-8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a50037.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a50037
PMID:24100855
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to estimate productivity-related savings associated with employee participation in health promotion programs.

METHODS

Propensity score weighting and multiple regression techniques were used to estimate savings. These techniques were adjusted for demographic and health status differences between participants who engaged in one or more telephonic health management programs and nonparticipants who were eligible for but did not engage in these programs.

RESULTS

Employees who participated in a program and successfully improved their health care or lifestyle showed significant improvements in lost work time. These employees saved an average of $353 per person per year. This reflects about 10.3 hours in additional productive time annually, compared with similar, but nonparticipating employees.

CONCLUSIONS

Participating in health promotion programs can help improve productivity levels among employees and save money for their employers.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在估计员工参与健康促进计划所带来的与生产力相关的节省。

方法

采用倾向评分加权和多元回归技术来估算节省的金额。这些技术根据参与一个或多个电话健康管理计划的员工与符合条件但未参与这些计划的非参与者之间的人口统计学和健康状况差异进行了调整。

结果

参与并成功改善其医疗保健或生活方式的员工在工作时间损失方面显示出显著改善。这些员工每人每年平均节省 353 美元。这反映了与类似但未参与的员工相比,每年增加了约 10.3 小时的生产时间。

结论

参与健康促进计划可以帮助提高员工的生产力水平,并为雇主节省资金。

相似文献

1
Improving employee productivity through improved health.通过改善健康来提高员工生产力。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Oct;55(10):1142-8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a50037.
2
Managing manifest diseases, but not health risks, saved PepsiCo money over seven years.在七年时间里,管理显性疾病而非健康风险为百事公司节省了资金。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jan;33(1):124-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0625.
3
An evaluation of the Well at Dell health management program: health risk change and financial return on investment.戴尔健康管理项目之健康评估:健康风险变化与投资财务回报
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Jan-Feb;29(3):147-57. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.131115-QUAN-582.
4
The Association Between Health Program Participation and Employee Retention.
J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep;58(9):896-901. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000820.
5
Perceived workplace health support is associated with employee productivity.感知到的工作场所健康支持与员工生产力相关。
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Jan-Feb;29(3):139-46. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.131216-QUAN-645.
6
The hidden costs of employee drinking: A quantitative analysis.员工饮酒的隐性成本:定量分析。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 Jul;38(5):543-553. doi: 10.1111/dar.12935. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
Financial impact of a comprehensive multisite workplace health promotion program.一项综合性多场所工作场所健康促进计划的财务影响。
Prev Med. 2005 Feb;40(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.008.
8
The savings gained from participation in health promotion programs for Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人参与健康促进项目所获得的节省费用。
J Occup Environ Med. 2006 Nov;48(11):1125-32. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000240709.01860.8a.
9
Two-year impact of lifestyle changes on workplace productivity loss in the Heart of New Ulm Project.新乌尔姆项目核心区生活方式改变对工作场所生产力损失的两年影响。
Occup Environ Med. 2015 Jun;72(6):460-2. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102620. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
10
The effectiveness of a health promotion program after 3 years: evidence from the University of Minnesota.健康促进计划 3 年后的效果:来自明尼苏达大学的证据。
Med Care. 2012 Sep;50(9):772-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a8b1f.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening the effectiveness of community health system: Assessing the factors that enhance or constrain the delivery of health services within communities in Nigeria.加强社区卫生系统的效能:评估在尼日利亚社区中增强或限制卫生服务提供的因素。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Sep 5;22(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01204-9.
2
The Impact of Environmental Volunteering on Employees, Companies, and Local Communities: A Case Study on Romanian Companies.环境志愿服务对员工、公司和当地社区的影响:以罗马尼亚公司为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 16;21(5):631. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050631.
3
Is It Time to Re-Shift the Research Agenda? A Scoping Review of Participation Rates in Workplace Health Promotion Programs.
是时候重新调整研究议程了吗?工作场所健康促进计划参与率的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;20(3):2757. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032757.
4
Age Influences on Lifestyle and Stress Perception in the Working Population.年龄对工作人群生活方式和压力感知的影响。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 12;15(2):399. doi: 10.3390/nu15020399.
5
From Cognition to Behavior: Associations of Workplace Health Culture and Workplace Health Promotion Performance With Personal Healthy Lifestyles.从认知到行为:工作场所健康文化和工作场所健康促进绩效与个人健康生活方式的关联。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 8;9:745846. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.745846. eCollection 2021.
6
Evidence of Better Psychological Profile in Working Population Meeting Current Physical Activity Recommendations.目前体力活动建议的工作人群中更好的心理特征证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8991. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178991.
7
Exercise Prescription to Foster Health and Well-Being: A Behavioral Approach to Transform Barriers into Opportunities.运动处方促进健康和幸福:一种将障碍转化为机会的行为方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 22;18(3):968. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030968.
8
Cost of poor health to the labour market returns to education in Australia: another pathway for socio-economic inequality.健康不佳对劳动力市场的成本回报与澳大利亚的教育:社会经济不平等的另一个途径。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):635-648. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01163-2. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
9
Presenteeism among Chinese workers in Japan and its relationship with mental health and health-promoting lifestyles.在日中国劳动者的出勤主义及其与心理健康和促进健康生活方式的关系。
Ind Health. 2020 Feb 4;58(1):35-45. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2018-0201. Epub 2019 Jun 29.