Lee SunWoo, Lee TaeBum, Kim HoYoun, Kim JungSoo, Eun HyeJun, Kim RyunKyung
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:3765-8. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610363.
The recent rapid growth in demand for aesthetic non-invasive laser treatments such as unwanted skin rejuvenation, removal of age-related vascular blemishes has led to a boom in the medical devices to treat these conditions. Among diverse laser for skin treatment, copper bromide laser is a very effective, safe, and well tolerated treatment for facial telangiectasia at various energy levels and the most important thing of the copper bromide laser device is that the stability of the energy. However there is no evidence about effective copper bromide laser's energy level for the treatment of vascular lesions. We compared energy stability and treatment performance between two energy levels in 2 W and 8 W which commonly use in laser treatment for the vascular lesions. 8 W copper bromide laser was more stable compared than 2 W copper bromide laser. Also, 8 W copper bromide laser was effectively superior to 2 W copper bromide laser in treatment of vascular legion. Consequently, 8 W copper bromide laser treatment for vascular lesion might be more suitable than 2 W copper bromide laser.
近期，对诸如非侵入性皮肤美容激光治疗（如改善皮肤老化、去除与年龄相关的血管瑕疵）等需求迅速增长，这导致了用于治疗这些病症的医疗设备蓬勃发展。在各种用于皮肤治疗的激光中，溴化铜激光在不同能量水平下对面部毛细血管扩张症是一种非常有效、安全且耐受性良好的治疗方法，而溴化铜激光设备最重要的是能量的稳定性。然而，尚无关于有效治疗血管病变的溴化铜激光能量水平的证据。我们比较了常用于血管病变激光治疗的2W和8W这两种能量水平之间的能量稳定性和治疗性能。8W溴化铜激光比2W溴化铜激光更稳定。此外，8W溴化铜激光在治疗血管病变方面比2W溴化铜激光更具疗效优势。因此，8W溴化铜激光治疗血管病变可能比2W溴化铜激光更合适。
