Suppr超能文献

用于治疗肌张力障碍的深部脑刺激术。

Deep brain stimulation for dystonia.

作者信息

Vidailhet Marie, Jutras Marie-France, Roze Emmanuel, Grabli David

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Research Center of the Brain and Spinal Cord Institute, Université Paris 6/Inserm UMR S975, Paris, France; Pierre et Marie Curie Paris-6 University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:167-87. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00014-0.

Abstract

The few reported controlled studies show that bilateral stimulation of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) is a safe and effective long-term treatment for hyperkinetic disorders. However, the recently published data on deep brain stimulation (DBS) applied to different targets or patients (especially those with secondary dystonia) are mainly uncontrolled case reports, precluding a clear determination of its efficacy, and providing little guidance as to the choice of a "good" target in a "good" patient. This chapter reviews the literature on DBS in primary dystonia, paying particular attention to the risk:benefit ratio in focal and segmental dystonias (cervical dystonia, cranial dystonia) and to the predictive factors for a good outcome. The chapter also highlights recent data on the marked benefits of the technique in myoclonus dystonia (in which pallidal, as opposed to thalamic, stimulation is more effective) and in tardive dystonia-dyskinesia. Although, the decision to treat appears relatively straightforward in patients with primary dystonia, myoclonus-dystonia, and tardive dystonia who have a normal findings on magnetic resonance imaging and normal cognitive function, there are still no reliable tools to help predict the timescale of postoperative benefit. This chapter provides a comprehensive analysis of the use of the treatment in various types of secondary dystonia, with little to moderate benefit in most cases, based on single cases or small series. Beyond the reduction in the severity of dystonia, the global motor and functional outcome is difficult to determine owing to the paucity of adequate evaluation tools. Because of the large interpatient variability, different targets may be effective depending on the symptoms in each individual.

摘要

少数已报道的对照研究表明,双侧刺激内侧苍白球(GPi)是治疗运动亢进性疾病的一种安全有效的长期疗法。然而,最近发表的关于深部脑刺激(DBS)应用于不同靶点或患者(尤其是继发性肌张力障碍患者)的数据主要是无对照的病例报告,无法明确确定其疗效,也几乎无法为在“合适”的患者中选择“合适”的靶点提供指导。本章回顾了关于原发性肌张力障碍中DBS的文献,特别关注局灶性和节段性肌张力障碍(颈部肌张力障碍、颅部肌张力障碍)的风险效益比以及良好预后的预测因素。本章还强调了该技术在肌阵挛性肌张力障碍(其中苍白球刺激而非丘脑刺激更有效)和迟发性肌张力障碍 - 运动障碍中的显著益处的最新数据。尽管对于磁共振成像结果正常且认知功能正常的原发性肌张力障碍、肌阵挛性肌张力障碍和迟发性肌张力障碍患者,治疗决策似乎相对简单,但仍然没有可靠的工具来帮助预测术后获益的时间尺度。本章基于单例或小系列病例,对该治疗方法在各种类型继发性肌张力障碍中的应用进行了全面分析,大多数情况下获益较小至中等。除了肌张力障碍严重程度的降低外,由于缺乏足够的评估工具,整体运动和功能结局难以确定。由于患者间差异较大,不同的靶点可能因个体症状而异而有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验