Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Med Educ. 2013 Nov;47(11):1073-9. doi: 10.1111/medu.12246.
Although feedback is a critical component of learning, recent data suggest that learners may discount feedback they receive. The emotional threat inherent in feedback can contribute to its ineffectiveness, particularly for sensitive topics like communication skills. Longitudinal relationships among peers may increase their sense of safety and soften the perceived threat of feedback to allow students to give, receive and potentially more effectively incorporate feedback. We studied the effects of prior shared learning experiences among medical students in the delivery and receipt of feedback on clinical (communication) skills.
During a formative clinical skills examination, we divided Year 3 students at a US medical school into two subgroups comprising, respectively, small-group classmates from a 2-year longitudinal pre-clerkship clinical skills course (with prior peer-learning relationships), and peers with no prior shared small-group coursework. Students in both subgroups observed peers in a simulated clinical case and then provided feedback, which was videotaped, transcribed and coded. Feedback recipients also completed a survey on their perceptions of the feedback.
Students valued the feedback they received and intended to enact it, regardless of whether they had prior peer-learning relationships. Coding of feedback revealed high specificity. Feedback providers who had prior peer-learning relationships with recipients provided more specific corrective feedback on communication skills than those with no such relationships (p = 0.014); there was no significant difference between subgroups in the provision of reinforcing feedback on communication skills.
Year 3 medical student peers can deliver specific feedback on clinical skills; prior peer-learning relationships in pre-clerkship clinical skills courses enrich the provision of specific corrective feedback about communication skills. Feedback between peers with pre-existing peer-learning relationships represents an additional and potentially underutilised method of helping students improve clinical skills in sensitive realms such as interpersonal communication.
尽管反馈是学习的关键组成部分,但最近的数据表明,学习者可能会对他们收到的反馈不屑一顾。反馈中固有的情感威胁会导致其效果不佳,尤其是对于沟通技巧等敏感话题。同伴之间的纵向关系可能会增加他们的安全感,并减轻反馈的感知威胁,从而使学生能够提供、接收并可能更有效地整合反馈。我们研究了医学生在提供和接收临床(沟通)技能反馈方面先前的共享学习经验对反馈的影响。
在一项形成性临床技能考试中,我们将美国一所医学院的三年级学生分为两个小组,分别是来自为期两年的预科临床技能课程的小组成员(有先前的同伴学习关系)和没有先前共享小组成员课程的同伴。两个小组的学生都观察了模拟临床病例中的同伴,然后提供了录像、转录和编码的反馈。反馈接受者还完成了一份关于他们对反馈看法的调查。
无论学生是否有先前的同伴学习关系,他们都重视自己收到的反馈,并打算实施它。反馈编码显示出高度的特异性。与没有这种关系的反馈提供者相比,与反馈接受者有先前同伴学习关系的反馈提供者在沟通技能方面提供了更具体的纠正反馈(p=0.014);在沟通技能方面提供强化反馈方面,两个小组之间没有显著差异。
三年级医学生同伴可以提供关于临床技能的具体反馈;预科临床技能课程中的先前同伴学习关系丰富了关于沟通技能的具体纠正反馈的提供。具有预先存在的同伴学习关系的同伴之间的反馈代表了一种额外的、潜在未充分利用的方法,可以帮助学生在人际沟通等敏感领域提高临床技能。