P Nydahl, RN, Nursing Research, Director of Nursing and Patient Service, University hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Nurs Crit Care. 2014 Sep;19(5):222-7. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12046. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
Diaries in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) support patients and relatives during and after a stay on the ICU. Barriers to implementation of the ICU diary are workload, unwanted closeness to patients and lack of time.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the time nurses consume writing an ICU diary. Further questions were to examine whether the first diary entry, which includes a more detailed description about the admission, consumes more time than other entries and whether the time taken depends on experience or workload of the nurses.
Quantitative, prospective, international observational multicentre study in four ICUs within the international diary network in Germany (two ICUs), Sweden and Switzerland (one ICU each).
During a 6-month period in 2012/2013 nurses measured the time they consumed writing a diary in minutes and seconds, the number of diaries they contributed to and total number of diary entries, the nurse-patient ratio, their level of experience in writing diaries, interruptions while writing in a diary and additional information like photographs or follow-up visits.
In summary 29 diaries were collected which included 195 written entries. The first entry needed significantly more time than following entries (first entry: mean 13:33 min versus following entries: mean 5:31, p < 0·001). The mean time for following entries differed significantly between the countries: Switzerland: 6:14, Sweden 5:31 and Germany 3:36 (p < 0·001). Nurses with more experience used more time to write a diary (not significant). With increasing nurse-patient-ratio the time decreased for following entries (ratio 1:1: mean 5:42, ratio 1:2: mean 5:27, ratio 1:3: mean 3:12, p = 0·007).
Writing a diary for patients and relatives means an additional amount of time and workload, but according to the increased quality of nursing the time seems to be feasible for implementation. The measured time was self-reported, thus including possible bias for the results.
重症监护病房(ICU)日记可以在患者入住 ICU 期间和之后为患者及其家属提供支持。实施 ICU 日记存在的障碍包括工作量大、与患者过于亲近以及缺乏时间。
本研究旨在评估护士撰写 ICU 日记所花费的时间。进一步的问题是,检查首次日记记录(包括对入院情况的更详细描述)是否比其他记录花费更多时间,以及所花费的时间是否取决于护士的经验或工作量。
在德国(两个 ICU)、瑞典和瑞士(每个国家一个 ICU)的国际日记网络内进行的为期 6 个月的、定量的、前瞻性的、国际多中心观察研究。
在 2012/2013 年的 6 个月期间,护士记录了撰写日记所花费的时间(分钟和秒)、撰写的日记数量以及日记记录的总次数、护士与患者的比例、他们撰写日记的经验水平、撰写日记时的中断情况以及其他信息,如照片或随访。
共收集了 29 份日记,其中包括 195 份书面记录。首次记录所需的时间明显长于后续记录(首次记录:平均 13:33 分钟,而后续记录:平均 5:31 分钟,p < 0·001)。不同国家的后续记录的平均时间有显著差异:瑞士 6:14 分钟、瑞典 5:31 分钟和德国 3:36 分钟(p < 0·001)。经验丰富的护士撰写日记所需的时间更长(无统计学意义)。随着护士与患者比例的增加,后续记录的时间减少(比例 1:1:平均 5:42 分钟,比例 1:2:平均 5:27 分钟,比例 1:3:平均 3:12 分钟,p = 0·007)。
为患者和家属撰写日记意味着需要额外的时间和工作量,但根据护理质量的提高,实施这项工作似乎是可行的。所测量的时间是自我报告的,因此可能会对结果产生偏差。