Paterson Ian, Wells George A, Ezekowitz Justin A, White James A, Friedrich Matthias G, Mielniczuk Lisa M, O'Meara Eileen, Chow Benjamin, DeKemp Rob A, Klein Ran, Dennie Carole, Dick Alexander, Coyle Doug, Dwivedi Girish, Rajda Miroslaw, Wright Graham A, Laine Mika, Hanninen Helena, Larose Eric, Connelly Kim A, Leong-Poi Howard, Howarth Andrew G, Davies Ross A, Duchesne Lloyd, Yla-Herttuala Seppo, Saraste Antti, Farand Paul, Garrard Linda, Tardif Jean-Claude, Arnold Malcolm, Knuuti Juhani, Beanlands Rob, Chan Kwan L
Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Trials. 2013 Oct 12;14:332. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-332.
Imaging has become a routine part of heart failure (HF) investigation. Echocardiography is a first-line test in HF given its availability and it provides valuable diagnostic and prognostic information. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is an emerging clinical tool in the management of patients with non-ischemic heart failure. Current ACC/AHA/CCS/ESC guidelines advocate its role in the detection of a variety of cardiomyopathies but there is a paucity of high quality evidence to support these recommendations.The primary objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic yield of routine cardiac magnetic resonance versus standard care (that is, echocardiography with only selective use of CMR) in patients with non-ischemic heart failure. The primary hypothesisis that the routine use of CMR will lead to a more specific diagnostic characterization of the underlying etiology of non-ischemic heart failure. This will lead to a reduction in the non-specific diagnoses of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and HF with preserved ejection fraction.
Tertiary care sites in Canada and Finland, with dedicated HF and CMR programs, will randomize consecutive patients with new or deteriorating HF to routine CMR or selective CMR. All patients will undergo a standard clinical echocardiogram and the interpreter will assign the most likely HF etiology. Those undergoing CMR will also have a standard examination and will be assigned a HF etiology based upon the findings. The treating physician's impression about non-ischemic HF etiology will be collected following all baseline testing (including echo ± CMR). Patients will be followed annually for 4 years to ascertain clinical outcomes, quality of life and cost. The expected outcome is that the routine CMR arm will have a significantly higher rate of infiltrative, inflammatory, hypertrophic, ischemic and 'other' cardiomyopathy than the selective CMR group.
This study will be the first multicenter randomized, controlled trial evaluating the role of CMR in non-ischemic HF. Non-ischemic HF patients will be randomized to routine CMR in order to determine whether there are any gains over management strategies employing selective CMR utilization. The insight gained from this study should improve appropriate CMR use in HF.
NCT01281384.
影像学检查已成为心力衰竭(HF)诊断的常规手段。鉴于超声心动图的可及性,它是HF的一线检查方法,能提供有价值的诊断和预后信息。心脏磁共振成像(CMR)是用于非缺血性心力衰竭患者管理的一种新兴临床工具。目前美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)/加拿大心血管学会(CCS)/欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)指南提倡其在多种心肌病检测中的作用,但缺乏高质量证据支持这些建议。本研究的主要目的是比较常规心脏磁共振成像与标准治疗(即仅选择性使用CMR的超声心动图检查)在非缺血性心力衰竭患者中的诊断效能。主要假设是常规使用CMR将更明确地诊断非缺血性心力衰竭的潜在病因,这将减少特发性扩张型心肌病和射血分数保留的心力衰竭的非特异性诊断。
加拿大和芬兰设有专门的HF和CMR项目的三级医疗机构,将连续纳入新发或病情恶化的HF患者,随机分为常规CMR组或选择性CMR组。所有患者均接受标准临床超声心动图检查,解读人员将确定最可能的HF病因。接受CMR检查的患者也将进行标准检查,并根据检查结果确定HF病因。在所有基线检查(包括超声心动图±CMR)后,收集主治医生对非缺血性HF病因的判断。患者将接受为期4年的年度随访,以确定临床结局、生活质量和费用。预期结果是常规CMR组浸润性、炎症性、肥厚性、缺血性和“其他”心肌病的发生率将显著高于选择性CMR组。
本研究将是第一项评估CMR在非缺血性HF中作用的多中心随机对照试验。非缺血性HF患者将被随机分配至常规CMR组,以确定与采用选择性CMR的管理策略相比是否有任何益处。本研究获得的见解应能改善CMR在HF中的合理应用。
NCT01281384。