Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Trials. 2013 Jul 16;14:218. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-218.
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the most common cause of heart failure (HF); however, the role of revascularization in these patients is still unclear. Consensus on proper use of cardiac imaging to help determine which candidates should be considered for revascularization has been hindered by the absence of clinical studies that objectively and prospectively compare the prognostic information of each test obtained using both standard and advanced imaging.
METHODS/DESIGN: This paper describes the design and methods to be used in the Alternative Imaging Modalities in Ischemic Heart Failure (AIMI-HF) multi-center trial. The primary objective is to compare the effect of HF imaging strategies on the composite clinical endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrest and re-hospitalization for cardiac causes.In AIMI-HF, patients with HF of ischemic etiology (n = 1,261) will follow HF imaging strategy algorithms according to the question(s) asked by the physicians (for example, Is there ischemia and/or viability?), in agreement with local practices. Patients will be randomized to either standard (SPECT, Single photon emission computed tomography) imaging modalities for ischemia and/or viability or advanced imaging modalities: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) or positron emission tomography (PET). In addition, eligible and consenting patients who could not be randomized, but were allocated to standard or advanced imaging based on clinical decisions, will be included in a registry.
AIMI-HF will be the largest randomized trial evaluating the role of standard and advanced imaging modalities in the management of ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure. This trial will complement the results of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) viability substudy and the PET and Recovery Following Revascularization (PARR-2) trial. The results will provide policy makers with data to support (or not) further investment in and wider dissemination of alternative 'advanced' imaging technologies.
NCT01288560.
缺血性心脏病(IHD)是心力衰竭(HF)最常见的原因;然而,这些患者的血运重建作用仍不清楚。由于缺乏客观和前瞻性比较使用标准和先进成像技术获得的每种测试的预后信息的临床研究,因此共识未能就适当使用心脏成像来帮助确定哪些候选者应考虑进行血运重建达成一致。
方法/设计:本文介绍了在缺血性心力衰竭的替代成像模式(AIMI-HF)多中心试验中使用的设计和方法。主要目的是比较 HF 成像策略对心脏死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、心脏骤停和因心脏原因再次住院的复合临床终点的影响。在 AIMI-HF 中,缺血性病因 HF 的患者(n=1261)将根据医生提出的问题(例如,是否存在缺血和/或活力?)遵循 HF 成像策略算法,与当地实践一致。患者将随机分配至标准(SPECT,单光子发射计算机断层扫描)成像方式进行缺血和/或活力检查,或高级成像方式:心脏磁共振成像(CMR)或正电子发射断层扫描(PET)。此外,符合条件且同意的患者,如果由于临床决策而无法进行随机分组,但被分配至标准或高级成像,则将被纳入注册研究。
AIMI-HF 将是评估标准和先进成像方式在缺血性心肌病和心力衰竭管理中的作用的最大规模随机试验。该试验将补充外科治疗缺血性心力衰竭(STICH)活力亚研究和正电子发射断层扫描和血运重建后恢复(PARR-2)试验的结果。结果将为决策者提供数据,以支持(或不支持)对替代“先进”成像技术的进一步投资和更广泛的传播。
NCT01288560。