• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尺骨远端骨折:锁定钢板与非锁定钢板固定结构的生物力学比较

Distal Ulna Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plating Constructs.

作者信息

Collins Melissa, Hart Adam, Hines Jerod, Steffen Thomas, Harvey Edward J, Martineau Paul A

机构信息

McGill University, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Aug;28(8):470-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000021.

DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000021
PMID:24121982
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the biomechanical properties of plating options for distal ulna fractures.

METHODS

Fourth-generation ulna artificial bones were osteotomized and fixed with 4 different constructs: 2 locking compression plates (a straight 2.7-mm plate and a 2.4-mm T-plate) with both nonlocking and locking screws. The artificial bones underwent nondestructive tests to determine construct stiffness in flexion/extension and lateral bending. The final testing consisted of cyclical loading in axial torsion until implant failure.

RESULTS

The straight plate fixation construct was significantly stiffer than the T-plate construct for both flexion/extension bending (P < 0.001) and radial/ulnar bending (P < 0.05). Nonlocking screws provided significantly stiffer fixation in flexion bending than locking screws (P < 0.05); however, no difference was found in extension bending. Conversely, locking screws were significantly stiffer in radial/ulnar bending than the nonlocking screws (P < 0.05). Failure under torsional cyclical loading was significantly different among constructs. The straight plate with nonlocking construct withstood the most half-cycles. The mechanisms of failure were unique to each type of fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not show any clear biomechanical advantage of locked plating for fractures of the distal ulna. The increased stiffness associated with locked plating likely contributes to earlier and more pronounced failure mechanisms under repetitive axial torsion.

摘要

目的

确定尺骨远端骨折钢板固定方式的生物力学特性。

方法

将第四代尺骨人工骨截骨后用4种不同的固定方式固定:2种锁定加压钢板(一种2.7毫米直形钢板和一种2.4毫米T形钢板),分别使用非锁定螺钉和锁定螺钉。对人工骨进行无损测试以确定其在屈伸和侧方弯曲时的固定刚度。最终测试包括轴向扭转循环加载直至植入物失效。

结果

在屈伸弯曲(P < 0.001)和桡尺侧弯曲(P < 0.05)方面,直形钢板固定结构均显著比T形钢板固定结构更硬。在屈伸弯曲时,非锁定螺钉提供的固定刚度显著高于锁定螺钉(P < 0.05);然而,在伸展弯曲时未发现差异。相反,在桡尺侧弯曲时,锁定螺钉比非锁定螺钉显著更硬(P < 0.05)。不同固定结构在扭转循环加载下的失效情况有显著差异。非锁定结构的直形钢板承受的半周期数最多。每种固定类型的失效机制各不相同。

结论

这些结果并未显示锁定钢板治疗尺骨远端骨折有任何明显的生物力学优势。锁定钢板相关的刚度增加可能导致在重复性轴向扭转下更早且更明显的失效机制。

相似文献

1
Distal Ulna Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plating Constructs.尺骨远端骨折:锁定钢板与非锁定钢板固定结构的生物力学比较
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Aug;28(8):470-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000021.
2
Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.锁定螺钉在肱骨干骨折钢板固定中是否具有优势?对合成骨和尸体骨的生物力学分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(10):709-15. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818df8cb.
3
Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.锁定与非锁定T型钢板用于背侧粉碎性桡骨远端骨折的掌侧和背侧固定:一项生物力学研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Jul;30(4):756-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.04.017.
4
Biomechanical comparison of bicortical locking versus unicortical far-cortex-abutting locking screw-plate fixation for comminuted radial shaft fractures.双皮质锁定与单皮质远皮质邻接锁定螺钉钢板固定治疗桡骨干粉碎性骨折的生物力学比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Oct;39(10):1907-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.141. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
5
Do Transcortical Screws in a Locking Plate Construct Improve the Stiffness in the Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Plating Constructs.锁定钢板结构中的经皮质螺钉能否提高温哥华B1型股骨假体周围骨折固定的刚度?两种不同钢板结构的生物力学分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan;31(1):15-20. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000704.
6
Biomechanical comparison of 4 different lateral plate constructs for distal fibula fractures.四种不同外侧接骨板固定治疗腓骨远端骨折的生物力学比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Nov;34(11):1588-95. doi: 10.1177/1071100713496223. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
7
A nonlocking end screw can decrease fracture risk caused by locked plating in the osteoporotic diaphysis.非锁定端螺钉可降低骨质疏松性骨干中锁定钢板所致的骨折风险。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91(3):620-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00408.
8
Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques.采用带节段性骨缺损的骨干骨折固定术:锁定钢板与传统钢板固定技术的生物力学比较
J Trauma. 2006 Apr;60(4):830-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000195462.53525.0c.
9
Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of pigeon (Columba livia) cadaver intact humeri and ostectomized humeri stabilized with caudally applied titanium locking plate or stainless steel nonlocking plate constructs.对鸽(家鸽)尸体完整肱骨以及用尾侧应用的钛锁定钢板或不锈钢非锁定钢板结构稳定的截骨肱骨进行体外生物力学评估。
Am J Vet Res. 2017 May;78(5):570-578. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.78.5.570.
10
A biomechanical comparison of one-third tubular plates versus periarticular plates for fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures.一种生物力学比较:三分之一管状钢板与关节周围钢板治疗骨质疏松性腓骨远端骨折的固定效果比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Sep;27(9):e201-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318281a565.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome (2024).尺骨撞击综合征诊断与治疗指南(2024年)
J Wrist Surg. 2024 May 27;14(1):2-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787156. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: a biomechanical evaluation.2.7毫米与3.5毫米锁定加压钢板治疗尺骨骨折的比较:生物力学评估
OTA Int. 2023 Jul 25;6(3):e278. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000278. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Finite element analysis of different locking plate fixation methods for the treatment of ulnar head fracture.
不同锁定钢板固定方法治疗尺骨头骨折的有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 15;16(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02334-4.