• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸骨上多普勒心输出量(USCOM)测量值与胸部放射学特征的相关性。

Correlation between supra-sternal Doppler cardiac output (USCOM) measurements and chest radiological features.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1156-60. doi: 10.1111/anae.12422. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1111/anae.12422
PMID:24128014
Abstract

Cardiac output can be measured non-invasively using supra-sternal Doppler (USCOM, Sydney, NSW, Australia). However, scanning can be difficult in practice in older patients, the reason for which has not been elucidated previously. Chest radiographs from 60 previously studied anaesthetised patients were reviewed and scored for aortic unfolding, enlargement and calcification, and cardiac enlargement. Corresponding supra-sternal Doppler scans were graded as easy or difficult using the Cattermole scoring system. Twenty patients who were difficult to scan, aged 60-88 years, had mean (SD) radiological scores of 5.9 (2.5) out of 12, while 20 adult controls, 40-60 years, and 20 older patients who were easy to scan, 60-80 years, had radiological scores of 0.9 (1.1) and 1.7 (1.4), respectively (p < 0.001). Over 75% of the patients who were difficult to scan had two or more radiological features suggestive of aortic unfolding and cardiac enlargement. Morphological or anatomical changes associated with ageing within the upper chest play an important part in the success of using supra-sternal Doppler in older patients.

摘要

心输出量可以使用胸骨上多普勒(USCOM,悉尼,新南威尔士州,澳大利亚)进行非侵入性测量。然而,在实际操作中,在老年患者中进行扫描可能会很困难,其原因以前尚未阐明。回顾了 60 名先前接受过麻醉研究的患者的胸部 X 光片,并对主动脉展开、增大和钙化以及心脏增大进行评分。使用 Cattermole 评分系统对胸骨上多普勒扫描进行了简单或困难的分级。20 名难以扫描的 60-88 岁患者的平均(SD)放射学评分为 12 分中的 5.9(2.5),而 20 名年龄在 40-60 岁的成年对照组和 20 名年龄在 60-80 岁的容易扫描的老年患者的放射学评分为 0.9(1.1)和 1.7(1.4)(p<0.001)。超过 75%的难以扫描的患者有两个或更多提示主动脉展开和心脏增大的放射学特征。上胸部与年龄相关的形态或解剖变化在胸骨上多普勒在老年患者中的成功应用中起着重要作用。

相似文献

1
Correlation between supra-sternal Doppler cardiac output (USCOM) measurements and chest radiological features.胸骨上多普勒心输出量(USCOM)测量值与胸部放射学特征的相关性。
Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1156-60. doi: 10.1111/anae.12422. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
2
Study to determine the repeatability of supra-sternal Doppler (ultrasound cardiac output monitor) during general anaesthesia: effects of scan quality, flow volume, and increasing age.研究确定胸骨上多普勒(超声心输出量监测仪)在全身麻醉期间的可重复性:扫描质量、流量和年龄增长的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Dec;111(6):907-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet254. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
3
USCOM-window to the circulation: utility of supra-sternal Doppler in an elderly anaesthetized patient for a robotic cystectomy.USCOM——通向循环系统的窗口:胸骨上多普勒在老年麻醉患者机器人辅助膀胱切除术中的应用
J Clin Monit Comput. 2014 Feb;28(1):83-93. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9499-5. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
4
Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter.胸骨上心脏输出量监测仪(USCOM)与肺动脉导管的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec;103(6):800-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep296. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
5
Assessment of portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor) for cardiac output measurements in neonates.便携式连续波多普勒超声(超声心输出量监测仪)用于新生儿心输出量测量的评估。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;45(7-8):464-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01535.x.
6
[Clinical study of neonatal cardiac output measurement methods].[新生儿心输出量测量方法的临床研究]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;51(1):58-63.
7
Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?串联使用两个多普勒心输出量监测仪能否为验证研究提供可靠的变化趋势线?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Oct;30(5):559-67. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9753-0. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.无创心输出量监测仪USCOM-1A在危重症患者中的临床验证
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Nov;25(11):917-24. doi: 10.1017/S0265021508004882. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
9
Intra- and inter-observer reliability using a noninvasive ultrasound cardiac output monitor in healthy anesthetized children.在健康麻醉儿童中使用无创超声心输出量监测仪的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Aug;21(8):858-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03480.x. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
10
Measurement of systemic oxygen delivery and inotropy in healthy term neonates with the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM).使用超声心输出量监测仪(USCOM)测量健康足月新生儿的全身氧输送和变力性。
Early Hum Dev. 2013 May;89(5):289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing ultrasound cardiac output monitor waveform quality in patients admitted to the emergency intensive care unit.影响急诊重症监护病房患者超声心输出量监测仪波形质量的因素。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 7;10(7):e29242. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29242. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
2
Measuring the cardiac output in acute emergency admissions: use of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with determination of the learning curve and inter-rater reliability.急性急诊入院患者的心输出量测量:使用无创超声心输出量监测仪(USCOM)并确定学习曲线和评分者间信度。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 May;17(2):122-128. doi: 10.1177/1751143715619186. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
3
A comparison of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the oesophageal Doppler monitor during major abdominal surgery.
大型腹部手术期间非侵入性超声心输出量监测仪(USCOM)与食管多普勒监测仪的比较。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 May;17(2):103-110. doi: 10.1177/1751143715610785. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
4
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.《临床监测与计算杂志》2016年年终总结:心血管与血流动力学监测
J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Feb;31(1):5-17. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-9976-3. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
5
Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?串联使用两个多普勒心输出量监测仪能否为验证研究提供可靠的变化趋势线?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Oct;30(5):559-67. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9753-0. Epub 2015 Aug 28.