1Department of Critical Care Medicine and Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ. 3Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. 4Department of Critical Care and Anesthesiology and SAMU, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Paris, France. 5Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France. 6Departments for Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Management, Vivantes-Klinikum Neukoelln, Berlin, Germany. 7Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea. 8Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto ON, Canada. 9The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto ON, Canada. 10Departments of Critical Care and Medicine, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):404-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a27909.
Treatment with inhaled nitric oxide improves oxygenation but not survival in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, but the effect may depend on the severity of hypoxemia. Our objective was to determine whether nitric oxide reduces hospital mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 100 mm Hg) but not in patients with mild-moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (100 < PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg) at the time of randomization.
Data were collected from Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL electronic databases (inception to May 2013); proceedings from five conferences (to May 2013); and trial registries (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov and http://www.controlled-trials.com). No language restrictions were applied.
Two authors independently selected parallel-group randomized controlled trials comparing nitric oxide with control (placebo or no gas) in mechanically ventilated adults or postneonatal children with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Two authors independently extracted data from included trials. Trial investigators provided subgroup data. Meta-analyses used within-trial subgroups and random-effects models.
Nine trials (n = 1,142 patients) met inclusion criteria. Overall methodological quality was good. Nitric oxide did not reduce mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (risk ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.78-1.32]; p = 0.93; n = 329, six trials) or mild-moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (risk ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.89-1.42]; p = 0.33; n = 740, seven trials). Risk ratios were similar between subgroups (interaction p = 0.53). There was no between-trial heterogeneity in any analysis (I = 0%). Varying the PaO2/FIO2 threshold between 70 and 200 mm Hg, in increments of 10 mm Hg, did not identify any threshold at which the nitric oxide-treated patients had lower mortality relative to controls.
Nitric oxide does not reduce mortality in adults or children with acute respiratory distress syndrome, regardless of the degree of hypoxemia. Given the lack of related ongoing or recently completed randomized trials, new data addressing the effectiveness of nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and severe hypoxemia will not be available for the foreseeable future.
吸入一氧化氮可改善氧合作用,但不能提高急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者的存活率,但疗效可能取决于低氧血症的严重程度。我们的目的是确定在随机分组时,一氧化氮是否降低严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者(PaO2/FIO2≤100mmHg)而不是轻度至中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者(100<PaO2/FIO2≤300mmHg)的院内死亡率。
从 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 电子数据库(创建至 2013 年 5 月);五次会议记录(至 2013 年 5 月)和试验注册处(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov 和 http://www.controlled-trials.com)收集数据。未应用语言限制。
两位作者独立选择了比较一氧化氮与机械通气的成人或新生儿后急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的对照(安慰剂或无气体)的平行组随机对照试验。
两位作者独立从纳入的试验中提取数据。试验研究者提供了亚组数据。使用试验内亚组和随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
9 项试验(n=1142 例患者)符合纳入标准。整体方法学质量良好。一氧化氮并未降低严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者(风险比,1.01[95%CI,0.78-1.32];p=0.93;n=329,6 项试验)或轻度至中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者(风险比,1.12[95%CI,0.89-1.42];p=0.33;n=740,7 项试验)的死亡率。亚组之间的风险比相似(交互作用 p=0.53)。在任何分析中均无试验间异质性(I=0%)。在 70 至 200mmHg 之间以 10mmHg 为增量改变 PaO2/FIO2 阈值,没有确定任何阈值,在该阈值下,接受一氧化氮治疗的患者的死亡率低于对照组。
无论低氧血症的严重程度如何,一氧化氮都不能降低急性呼吸窘迫综合征成人或儿童的死亡率。鉴于目前尚无相关的正在进行或最近完成的随机试验,在可预见的未来,不会有新的数据来确定一氧化氮在严重低氧血症的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中的疗效。