Chen Zhen, Dorfman Kevin D
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Electrophoresis. 2014 Mar;35(5):654-61. doi: 10.1002/elps.201300381. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
We used Brownian dynamics simulations to compare DNA separations in microfabricated post arrays containing either hexagonal or lamellar lattices. Contrary to intuition, dense hexagonal arrays with frequent DNA post collisions do not yield the optimal separation. Rather, hexagonal arrays with pore sizes commensurate with the radius of gyration of the DNA lead to increased separation resolution due to a molecular weight dependent collision probability that increases with molecular weight. However, when the hexagonal array is too sparse, this advantage is lost due to the low number of collisions. Lamellar lattices, such as the DNA nanofence, appear to be superior to a hexagonal array at the same post density, since the lamellar lattice combines regions for DNA relaxation with locally dense post regions for collisions. The relative advantages of different post arrays designs are explained in terms of the statistics for the number of collisions and the holdup time, providing guidelines for designing post arrays for separating long DNA.
我们使用布朗动力学模拟来比较包含六边形或层状晶格的微加工柱阵列中的DNA分离情况。与直觉相反,具有频繁DNA与柱碰撞的密集六边形阵列并不会产生最佳分离效果。相反,孔径与DNA回转半径相当的六边形阵列由于碰撞概率与分子量相关且随分子量增加,从而导致分离分辨率提高。然而,当六边形阵列过于稀疏时,由于碰撞次数少,这种优势就会丧失。层状晶格,如DNA纳米围栏,在相同的柱密度下似乎优于六边形阵列,因为层状晶格将DNA弛豫区域与局部密集的用于碰撞的柱区域结合在一起。不同柱阵列设计的相对优势通过碰撞次数和滞留时间的统计数据来解释,为设计用于分离长DNA的柱阵列提供了指导。