Sinha Sanjeev, Raghunandan Puroshottam, Chandrashekhar Rahul, Sharma Surendra K, Kumar Sanjiv, Dhooria Sahajal, Ekka Meera, Velpandian Thirumurthy, Ranjan Sanjay, Ahmad Hafeez, Samantaray Jyotish Chandra, Venkatesh Srinivasaraghavan, Rewari Bharat Bhushan, Khan Nawaid Hussain, Pandey Ravindra Mohan
Departments of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India.
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Oct 17;13:482. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-482.
Administration of rifampicin along with nevirapine reduces the plasma concentration of nevirapine in human immunodeficiency virus positive individuals with concomitant tuberculosis (HIV-TB patients). Nevirapine is a much cheaper drug than its alternative efavirenz, and might be beneficial in resource constrained settings.
A randomised open label trial was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. During the regimen of an antiretroviral therapy (ART), naive HIV-TB patients were randomly assigned to receive either nevirapine or efavirenz based ART with concomitant rifampicin based anti-tubercular therapy (ATT). Participants were followed for 24 months after starting ART. The end points were virological, immunological and clinical responses, and progression of HIV disease marked by failure of ART.
Of the 135 HIV-TB patients, who were receiving rifampicin based ATT, 68 were selected randomly to receive efavirenz based ART and 67 to receive nevirapine based ART. The virological failure rates in the overall population, and the nevirapine and efavirenz groups were 14.1% (19/135); 14.9% (10/67) and 13.2% (9/68), respectively (p =0.94). No significant difference was found between the groups in the rate of clinical, immunological or virological failures. The overall mortality was 17% with no significant difference between the two groups. Except for the lead in period on day 14, the mean nevirapine concentration remained above 3 mg/L. No association was found between plasma levels of nevirapine and incidence of unfavourable outcomes in this group.
Outcome of ART in HIV-TB patients on rifampicin based ATT showed no significant difference, irrespective of whether efavirenz or nevirapine was used. Therefore, nevirapine based ART could be an alternative in the resource limited settings in patients with HIV and tuberculosis co-infection.
NCT No. 01805258.
在合并结核病的人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性个体(HIV-TB患者)中,利福平与奈韦拉平联合使用会降低奈韦拉平的血浆浓度。奈韦拉平是一种比其替代药物依非韦伦便宜得多的药物,在资源有限的环境中可能有益。
在印度新德里的全印度医学科学研究所进行了一项随机开放标签试验。在抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)方案期间,初治HIV-TB患者被随机分配接受基于奈韦拉平或依非韦伦的ART,并同时接受基于利福平的抗结核治疗(ATT)。开始ART后对参与者进行24个月的随访。终点指标为病毒学、免疫学和临床反应,以及以ART失败为标志的HIV疾病进展。
在135例接受基于利福平的ATT的HIV-TB患者中,随机选择68例接受基于依非韦伦的ART,67例接受基于奈韦拉平的ART。总体人群以及奈韦拉平和依非韦伦组的病毒学失败率分别为14.1%(19/135);14.9%(10/67)和13.2%(9/68)(p =0.94)。两组在临床、免疫学或病毒学失败率方面未发现显著差异。总死亡率为17%,两组之间无显著差异。除第14天的导入期外,奈韦拉平的平均浓度保持在3mg/L以上。该组中奈韦拉平的血浆水平与不良结局的发生率之间未发现关联。
接受基于利福平的ATT的HIV-TB患者的ART结局无显著差异,无论使用依非韦伦还是奈韦拉平。因此,基于奈韦拉平的ART可以作为HIV和结核病合并感染患者资源有限环境中的一种替代选择。
NCT编号01805258。