Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.
BMJ. 2013 Oct 17;347:f6070. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6070.
To test the effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services such that intervention and control groups have access to the same clinical care.
Researcher blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
UK primary care (Lothian, Scotland).
Adults with at least one admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the year before randomisation. We excluded people who had other significant lung disease, who were unable to provide informed consent or complete the study, or who had other significant social or clinical problems.
Participants were recruited between 21 May 2009 and 28 March 2011, and centrally randomised to receive telemonitoring or conventional self monitoring. Using a touch screen, telemonitoring participants recorded a daily questionnaire about symptoms and treatment use, and monitored oxygen saturation using linked instruments. Algorithms, based on the symptom score, generated alerts if readings were omitted or breached thresholds. Both groups received similar care from existing clinical services.
The primary outcome was time to hospital admission due to COPD exacerbation up to one year after randomisation. Other outcomes included number and duration of admissions, and validated questionnaire assessments of health related quality of life (using St George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ)), anxiety or depression (or both), self efficacy, knowledge, and adherence to treatment. Analysis was intention to treat.
Of 256 patients completing the study, 128 patients were randomised to telemonitoring and 128 to usual care; baseline characteristics of each group were similar. The number of days to admission did not differ significantly between groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.44). Over one year, the mean number of COPD admissions was similar in both groups (telemonitoring 1.2 admissions per person (standard deviation 1.9) v control 1.1 (1.6); P=0.59). Mean duration of COPD admissions over one year was also similar between groups (9.5 days per person (standard deviation 19.1) v 8.8 days (15.9); P=0.88). The intervention had no significant effect on SGRQ scores between groups (68.2 (standard deviation 16.3) v 67.3 (17.3); adjusted mean difference 1.39 (95% confidence interval -1.57 to 4.35)), or on other questionnaire outcomes. Conclusions In participants with a history of admission for exacerbations of COPD, telemonitoring was not effective in postponing admissions and did not improve quality of life. The positive effect of telemonitoring seen in previous trials could be due to enhancement of the underpinning clinical service rather than the telemonitoring communication.
ISRCTN96634935.
The trial was funded by an NHS applied research programme grant from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish government (ARPG/07/03). The funder had no role in study design and the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and the writing of the article and the decision to submit it for publication. NHS Lothian supported the telemonitoring service and the clinical services.
测试将远程监测整合到现有临床服务中以实现干预组和对照组获得相同临床护理的有效性。
研究人员盲法、多中心、随机对照试验。
英国初级保健(苏格兰洛锡安)。
在随机分组前一年至少有一次因慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)入院的成年人。我们排除了患有其他重大肺部疾病、无法提供知情同意或完成研究、或有其他重大社会或临床问题的人。
参与者于 2009 年 5 月 21 日至 2011 年 3 月 28 日期间招募,并接受中央随机分配接受远程监测或常规自我监测。使用触摸屏,远程监测参与者记录有关症状和治疗使用的每日问卷,并使用相关仪器监测血氧饱和度。基于症状评分的算法,如果读数被遗漏或超过阈值,则会生成警报。两组均从现有临床服务中获得类似的护理。
主要结局是随机分组后一年因 COPD 加重而住院的时间。其他结局包括入院次数和持续时间,以及经过验证的健康相关生活质量问卷评估(使用圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ))、焦虑或抑郁(或两者兼有)、自我效能、知识和治疗依从性。分析采用意向治疗。
在完成研究的 256 名患者中,128 名患者被随机分配到远程监测组,128 名患者被分配到常规护理组;每组的基线特征相似。组间入院天数无显著差异(调整后的危险比 0.98,95%置信区间 0.66 至 1.44)。在一年中,两组 COPD 入院的平均次数相似(远程监测组每人 1.2 次入院(标准差 1.9),对照组每人 1.1 次入院(1.6);P=0.59)。一年中 COPD 入院的平均持续时间也相似(每人 9.5 天(标准差 19.1),对照组每人 8.8 天(15.9);P=0.88)。干预措施对组间 SGRQ 评分没有显著影响(68.2(标准差 16.3),67.3(17.3);调整后的平均差异 1.39(95%置信区间-1.57 至 4.35)),或其他问卷结果。结论:在因 COPD 加重而入院的患者中,远程监测不能有效推迟入院,也不能改善生活质量。以前试验中观察到的远程监测的积极影响可能是由于增强了基础临床服务,而不是远程监测通信。
ISRCTN96634935。
该试验由苏格兰政府首席科学家办公室的 NHS 应用研究计划资助(ARPG/07/03)。资助者在研究设计、数据的收集、分析和解释以及文章的撰写和提交发表方面没有任何作用。NHS 洛锡安支持远程监测服务和临床服务。