• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于定性和定量证据的数字健康对呼吸二级护理中患者与医护人员关系的影响:系统评价

Impact of Digital Health on Patient-Provider Relationships in Respiratory Secondary Care Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence: Systematic Review.

作者信息

Senek Michaela, Drummond David, Pinnock Hilary, Hansen Kjeld, Ankolekar Anshu, O'Connor Úna, Gonsard Apolline, Mazulov Oleksandr, Sreter Katherina Bernadette, Thornton Christina, Powell Pippa

机构信息

School of Medicine and Population Health, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, University Hospital Necker Enfants Malades, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 30;27:e70970. doi: 10.2196/70970.

DOI:10.2196/70970
PMID:40446293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12166327/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health technology adoption has accelerated in respiratory care, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic, supporting various applications from self-management to telerehabilitation. While these technologies have transformed health care delivery, their impact on the patient-provider relationship in specialist respiratory care remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to systematically review the literature on the impact of digital health technology on the patient-provider relationship in respiratory secondary care settings and to understand the factors that enhance or diminish this relationship.

METHODS

In December 2023, we conducted a systematic review following Cochrane methodology, searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane databases, and PsycINFO. We included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies examining digital health interventions in respiratory secondary care. Trained volunteers from the European Respiratory Society CONNECT Clinical Research Collaboration performed screening and data extraction. We conducted a qualitative meta-synthesis of findings, followed by an abductive quantitative data analysis. A total of 3 stakeholder workshops were held to interpret findings collaboratively with patients and health care professionals.

RESULTS

From 15,779 papers screened, 97 met the inclusion criteria (55 qualitative/mixed-methods studies, 42 quantitative studies). Studies covered various respiratory conditions, including COPD (32%), asthma (26%), and COVID-19 (13%). Four main themes emerged: trust (foundational to the relationship), adoption factors (including clinical context and implementation drivers), confidence in technology (based on functionality and the evidence base), and connection (encompassing communication and a caring presence). Digital health technology can either enhance or diminish trust between patients and clinicians, with patients' perceptions of the motivations behind its implementation being crucial. While technology facilitated access and communication, remote consultations risked depersonalisation, particularly when not balanced with in-person interactions. Self-monitoring and access to information empowered patients and promoted more equitable patient-provider relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital health technology can either strengthen or weaken patient-provider relationships in respiratory care, with effects impacted by adoption factors, confidence in technology, connection, and patient empowerment. Maintaining trust in the era of digital care requires transparent implementation of motivations, consideration of individual circumstances, and reliable technology that supports rather than replaces the therapeutic relationship.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024493664; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024493664.

摘要

背景

自新冠疫情以来,数字健康技术在呼吸护理领域的应用加速,支持了从自我管理到远程康复等各种应用。虽然这些技术改变了医疗服务的提供方式,但它们对专科呼吸护理中患者与医护人员关系的影响仍知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在系统回顾关于数字健康技术对呼吸二级护理环境中患者与医护人员关系影响的文献,并了解增强或削弱这种关系的因素。

方法

2023年12月,我们按照Cochrane方法进行了一项系统综述,检索了MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane数据库和PsycINFO。我们纳入了定性、定量和混合方法研究,这些研究考察了呼吸二级护理中的数字健康干预措施。来自欧洲呼吸学会CONNECT临床研究协作组的经过培训的志愿者进行筛选和数据提取。我们对研究结果进行了定性元综合分析,随后进行了归纳性定量数据分析。共举办了3次利益相关者研讨会,与患者和医护人员合作解读研究结果。

结果

在筛选的15779篇论文中,97篇符合纳入标准(55篇定性/混合方法研究,42篇定量研究)。研究涵盖了各种呼吸疾病,包括慢性阻塞性肺疾病(32%)、哮喘(26%)和新冠(13%)。出现了四个主要主题:信任(关系的基础)、采用因素(包括临床背景和实施驱动因素)、对技术的信心(基于功能和证据基础)以及联系(包括沟通和关怀的存在)。数字健康技术既可以增强也可以削弱患者与临床医生之间的信任,患者对其实施背后动机的看法至关重要。虽然技术促进了获取和沟通,但远程会诊存在非个性化的风险,尤其是在与面对面互动不平衡的情况下。自我监测和获取信息增强了患者的能力,促进了更公平的患者与医护人员关系。

结论

数字健康技术在呼吸护理中既可以加强也可以削弱患者与医护人员的关系,其效果受到采用因素、对技术的信心、联系和患者赋权的影响。在数字护理时代维持信任需要透明地实施动机、考虑个体情况以及支持而非取代治疗关系的可靠技术。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42024493664;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024493664 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7704/12166327/6a89dd02f19b/jmir_v27i1e70970_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7704/12166327/5aedd3e23800/jmir_v27i1e70970_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7704/12166327/6a89dd02f19b/jmir_v27i1e70970_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7704/12166327/5aedd3e23800/jmir_v27i1e70970_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7704/12166327/6a89dd02f19b/jmir_v27i1e70970_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Digital Health on Patient-Provider Relationships in Respiratory Secondary Care Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence: Systematic Review.基于定性和定量证据的数字健康对呼吸二级护理中患者与医护人员关系的影响:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 30;27:e70970. doi: 10.2196/70970.
2
Effectiveness and Acceptability of Asynchronous Digital Health in Asthma Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.异步数字健康在哮喘护理中的有效性和可接受性:混合方法系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 3;26:e57708. doi: 10.2196/57708.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
Patients' Experiences of Digital Health Interventions for the Self-Management of Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.慢性疼痛自我管理数字健康干预措施的患者体验:系统评价与主题综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 18;27:e69100. doi: 10.2196/69100.
6
Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.数字健康干预对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e76323. doi: 10.2196/76323.
7
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
8
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
9
Barriers and facilitators to patient uptake and utilisation of digital interventions for the self-management of low back pain: a systematic review of qualitative studies.阻碍和促进患者接受和利用数字干预措施进行低背痛自我管理的因素:定性研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e038800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038800.
10
Factors Influencing Telemedicine Adoption Among Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Interview Study.影响医疗保健专业人员采用远程医疗的因素:定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 27;9:e54777. doi: 10.2196/54777.

本文引用的文献

1
Theoretical Perspectives Underpinning Research on the Physician-Patient Relationship in a Digital Health Practice: Scoping Review.数字健康实践中医患关系研究的理论基础:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2024 May 15;13:e47280. doi: 10.2196/47280.
2
Patient Characteristics and Telemedicine Use in the US, 2022.美国 2022 年患者特征和远程医疗使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243354. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3354.
3
Pharmacy users' perceptions, awareness and future expectations of community pharmacy in England: a focus group study.
英国社区药房的药剂师用户的认知、意识和未来期望:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2024 Feb 15;32(1):39-45. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riad082.
4
ERS "CONNECT" Clinical Research Collaboration - moving multiple digital innovations towards connected respiratory care: addressing the over-arching challenges of whole systems implementation.欧洲呼吸学会“CONNECT”临床研究合作项目——推动多项数字创新迈向互联呼吸照护:应对全系统实施的总体挑战。
Eur Respir J. 2023 Nov 9;62(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01680-2023. Print 2023 Nov.
5
The impact of eHealth on relationships and trust in primary care: a review of reviews.电子健康对初级保健中关系和信任的影响:综述研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 3;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02176-5.
6
Medication management of COVID-19 patients during transition to virtual models of care: a qualitative study.新冠疫情期间向虚拟护理模式过渡时新冠患者的药物管理:一项定性研究
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Oct 25;16(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00633-1.
7
Healthcare professional and manager perceptions on drivers, benefits, and challenges of telemedicine: results from a cross-sectional survey in the Italian NHS.医疗保健专业人员和管理人员对远程医疗的驱动因素、益处和挑战的看法:意大利国民保健服务体系横断面调查的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):1115. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10100-x.
8
Stakeholder Perceptions of a Web-Based Physical Activity Intervention for COPD: A Mixed-Methods Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对基于网络的身体活动干预的利益相关者认知:一项混合方法研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 29;12(19):6296. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196296.
9
Feasibility Testing of a Web-Based Reproductive Decision Support Tool for Cystic Fibrosis.基于网络的囊性纤维化生殖决策支持工具的可行性测试。
J Cyst Fibros. 2024 May;23(3):404-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
10
Factors influencing the successful implementation of a novel digital health application to streamline multidisciplinary communication across multiple organisations for emergency care.影响新型数字健康应用程序在多个组织中成功实施以简化急诊多学科沟通的因素。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Mar;30(2):184-198. doi: 10.1111/jep.13923. Epub 2023 Sep 18.