Int J Oral Sci. 2013 Dec;5(4):183-90. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2013.73. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
The objective of this systematic review was to assess tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region in vitro and in vivo. An electronic PubMed search was conducted to identify studies on tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region. The selected studies were analyzed in regard to type of crowns, natural antagonist, measuring protocol and outcome. From a yield of 1 000 titles, 43 articles were selected for full-text analysis; finally, no in vitro and only five in vivo studies met the inclusion criteria. As there is heterogeneity in design, used measuring method, ceramics and analysis-form, a meta-analysis was not possible. Results of these studies are very controversial which makes a scientifically valid comparison impossible. This review indicated that some all-ceramic crowns are as wear friendly as metal-ceramic crowns. Up to now, it has been impossible to associate tooth wear with any specific causal agent. The role of ceramic surface treatment that might be responsible for the changing in rate of tooth wear seems undetermined as yet through clinical trials. The literature reveals that studies on this topic are subject to a substantial amount of bias. Therefore, additional clinical studies, properly designed to diminish bias, are warranted.
本系统评价的目的是评估在后牙区,体外和体内陶瓷冠对牙齿磨损的影响。通过电子 PubMed 检索,确定了关于后牙区陶瓷冠对牙齿磨损的研究。对所选研究进行了分析,内容涉及冠的类型、天然对颌牙、测量方案和结果。从 1000 个标题中,选择了 43 篇全文进行分析;最终,没有体外研究,只有 5 项体内研究符合纳入标准。由于设计、使用的测量方法、陶瓷材料和分析形式存在异质性,因此无法进行荟萃分析。这些研究的结果存在很大争议,使得无法进行科学有效的比较。本综述表明,一些全瓷冠与金属-陶瓷冠一样具有良好的耐磨性。到目前为止,还不可能将牙齿磨损与任何特定的原因联系起来。通过临床试验,陶瓷表面处理可能是导致牙齿磨损率变化的原因,但尚未确定。文献表明,关于这个主题的研究存在很大的偏倚。因此,需要进行更多的、设计合理的、能减少偏倚的临床研究。