• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外猪模型实验研究表明,对于半月板周缘损伤,连续缝合优于间断缝合。

Outside-in continuous suturing is superior to interrupted suturing for repairing peripheral meniscus lesions: an in vitro biomechanical study using a porcine model.

机构信息

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1974-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.026. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.026
PMID:24140141
Abstract

PURPOSE

This in vitro biomechanical study using a porcine model compared peripheral longitudinal vertical meniscus lesion (PLVML) outside-in suture repair fixation strength using either interrupted or continuous "N" configuration No. 2-0 braided polyester sutures.

METHODS

Porcine lateral menisci were randomly assigned to group 1 (continuous) or group 2 (interrupted). Standardized PLVMLs were created in each specimen. Repaired specimens were placed in a specially designed clamp and loaded into a servohydraulic device. Specimens underwent preconditioning for 10 cycles (0.1 Hz, 5 to 20 N) and 500 submaximal loading cycles (0.5 Hz, 5 to 20 N), before load-to-failure testing (12.5 mm/s). A 30-second pause after preconditioning and after 10, 100, and 500 submaximal loading cycles enabled standardized digital photographs to be taken for gapping measurement determination. The failure mode was documented.

RESULTS

Displacement and gapping during preconditioning and submaximal loading cycles did not differ between groups. Group 1 withstood a greater failure load (mean, 118.3 N; 95% confidence interval [CI], 97.2 to 139.4 N) than group 2 (mean, 63.7 N; 95% CI, 51.2 to 76.2 N) (P < .0001) and displacement during load-to-failure testing (mean, 5.3 mm; 95% CI, 4.2 to 6.5 mm) than group 2 (mean, 3.2 mm; 95% CI, 2.1 to 4.3 mm) (P = .005). Group 1 failed by suture breakage or suture pulling through tissue, whereas group 2 primarily failed by knot slippage (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Group displacement and gapping differences were not observed after 500 submaximal loading cycles. PLVMLs repaired with a continuous N configuration, however, withstood greater load at failure and greater displacement before failure than repairs that used interrupted sutures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Continuous suture in an N configuration may improve PLVML repair fixation strength.

摘要

目的

本体外生物力学研究采用猪模型,比较了使用间断或连续“N”构型 2-0 编织聚酯缝线进行外周纵向垂直半月板损伤(PLVML)外侧入路缝合修复固定强度。

方法

猪外侧半月板随机分为 1 组(连续)或 2 组(间断)。在每个标本中创建标准化的 PLVML。修复后的标本放置在特殊设计的夹具中,并放入伺服液压装置。标本进行 10 个循环(0.1 Hz,5 至 20 N)和 500 个次最大加载循环(0.5 Hz,5 至 20 N)的预条件处理,然后进行失效测试(12.5 mm/s)。在预条件处理后和 10、100 和 500 个次最大加载循环后进行 30 秒暂停,以便对间距测量进行标准化数字照片拍摄。记录失效模式。

结果

在预条件处理和次最大加载循环期间,组间的位移和间距没有差异。组 1 承受的失效载荷更大(平均 118.3 N;95%置信区间 [CI],97.2 至 139.4 N),而组 2(平均 63.7 N;95% CI,51.2 至 76.2 N)(P<.0001)和失效测试期间的位移(平均 5.3 mm;95% CI,4.2 至 6.5 mm)也大于组 2(平均 3.2 mm;95% CI,2.1 至 4.3 mm)(P=.005)。组 1 因缝线断裂或缝线穿过组织而失效,而组 2 主要因结滑移而失效(P<.0001)。

结论

在 500 个次最大加载循环后,未观察到 PLVML 修复的组间位移和间距差异。然而,使用连续 N 构型修复的 PLVML 在外周纵向垂直半月板损伤中,失效时承受的载荷更大,失效前的位移也更大,而使用间断缝线修复的则更小。

临床意义

N 构型中的连续缝线可能会提高 PLVML 修复的固定强度。

相似文献

1
Outside-in continuous suturing is superior to interrupted suturing for repairing peripheral meniscus lesions: an in vitro biomechanical study using a porcine model.体外猪模型实验研究表明,对于半月板周缘损伤,连续缝合优于间断缝合。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1974-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.026. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
2
Repair of peripheral vertical meniscus lesions in porcine menisci: in vitro biomechanical testing of 3 different meniscus repair devices.猪半月板周围垂直半月板损伤的修复:3 种不同半月板修复装置的体外生物力学测试。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):1074-81. doi: 10.1177/0363546513479775. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
3
Cyclic test comparison of all-inside device and inside-out sutures for radial meniscus lesion repair: an in vitro porcine model study.全内固定装置与内外缝合修复放射状半月板损伤的循环测试比较:体外猪模型研究。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Dec;28(12):1873-81. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
4
The influence of suture material on the strength of horizontal mattress suture configuration for meniscus repair.缝合材料对半月板修复水平褥式缝合结构强度的影响。
Knee. 2013 Dec;20(6):577-80. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.11.010. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
5
A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus.尸体半月板中FasT-Fix半月板修复缝合系统与RapidLoc装置的生物力学比较。
Arthroscopy. 2006 Apr;22(4):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.12.009.
6
Biomechanical testing of new meniscal repair techniques containing ultra high-molecular weight polyethylene suture.新型含超高分子量聚乙烯缝线的半月板修复技术的生物力学测试。
Arthroscopy. 2009 Sep;25(9):959-67. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.03.020.
7
Horizontal suture placement influences meniscal repair fixation strength.水平缝合线放置方式影响半月板修复固定强度。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):615-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-1995-5. Epub 2012 Apr 7.
8
Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures.半月板修复系统的生物力学评估:半月板毒蛇修复系统、垂直褥式FasT-Fix装置和垂直褥式Ethibond缝线的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Dec;33(12):1846-52. doi: 10.1177/0363546505278254. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
9
Analysis of a new all-inside versus inside-out technique for repairing radial meniscal tears.一种用于修复桡侧半月板撕裂的全新全内技术与由外向内技术的分析。
Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb;31(2):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
10
[Biomechanical study on different high-strength sutures and suture site for repairing posterior root tear of the medial meniscus].[不同高强度缝线及缝合部位修复内侧半月板后根部撕裂的生物力学研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 May 25;34(5):442-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.05.009.