Suppr超能文献

人工血管移植物细菌侵袭的体外研究:弹性体密封和明胶涂层涤纶血管移植物的比较

The in vitro research of bacterial invasion of prosthetic vascular grafts: comparison of elastomer-sealed and gelatin-coated Dacron vascular grafts.

作者信息

Sasaki Yuki

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan,

出版信息

Surg Today. 2014 Aug;44(8):1542-7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0761-8. Epub 2013 Oct 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the process of bacterial invasion from the surface to inside prosthetic vascular grafts.

METHODS

Elastomer-sealed Dacron vascular grafts (ESDVGs) and gelatin-coated Dacron vascular grafts (GCDVGs) were cut into 6-cm segments and placed in a U-shaped configuration on culture plates. Physiological saline was poured inside the grafts and a suspension of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was added to the outside. Samples taken from inside the grafts at nine time points for up to 60 h were spread on agar. Bacterial colonies were then analyzed. The grafts were also examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

Contaminated vascular graft models were produced in 18 ESDVGs (group T) and 12 GCDVGs (group G). The bacterial counts inside the vascular grafts in both groups increased over time. Bacterial colonies were confirmed in all samples from group G by 30 h, whereas bacteria appeared inside the grafts from group T at various times between 0 and 60 h. Bacteria were undetectable in one model from group T throughout the study. SEM revealed that the elastomeric membrane in the ESDVG was uneven.

CONCLUSION

Bacterial invasion of vascular grafts does not always occur immediately after contamination. ESDVGs may be more resistant to bacterial invasion as they have a thicker and evenly enriched elastomeric membrane.

摘要

目的

研究细菌从人工血管移植物表面侵入内部的过程。

方法

将弹性体密封的涤纶血管移植物(ESDVGs)和明胶包被的涤纶血管移植物(GCDVGs)切成6厘米长的片段,呈U形放置在培养皿中。向移植物内部注入生理盐水,并在外部加入铜绿假单胞菌悬液。在长达60小时的九个时间点从移植物内部取样,铺在琼脂上。然后分析细菌菌落。还使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对移植物进行检查。

结果

在18个ESDVGs(T组)和12个GCDVGs(G组)中建立了污染血管移植物模型。两组血管移植物内部的细菌计数均随时间增加。G组在30小时时所有样本中均确认有细菌菌落,而T组移植物内部在0至60小时之间的不同时间出现细菌。在整个研究过程中,T组的一个模型中未检测到细菌。SEM显示ESDVG中的弹性体膜不均匀。

结论

血管移植物的细菌入侵并不总是在污染后立即发生。ESDVGs可能对细菌入侵更具抵抗力,因为它们有更厚且均匀富集的弹性体膜。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/4097199/3cc515821eb3/595_2013_761_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验