McGuire Joseph F, Nyirabahizi Epiphanie, Kircanski Katharina, Piacentini John, Peterson Alan L, Woods Douglas W, Wilhelm Sabine, Walkup John T, Scahill Lawrence
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 30;210(3):1198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
Cluster analytic methods have examined the symptom presentation of chronic tic disorders (CTDs), with limited agreement across studies. The present study investigated patterns, clinical correlates, and treatment outcome of tic symptoms. 239 youth and adults with CTDs completed a battery of assessments at baseline to determine diagnoses, tic severity, and clinical characteristics. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either a comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics (CBIT) or psychoeducation and supportive therapy (PST). A cluster analysis was conducted on the baseline Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) symptom checklist to identify the constellations of tic symptoms. Four tic clusters were identified: Impulse Control and Complex Phonic Tics; Complex Motor Tics; Simple Head Motor/Vocal Tics; and Primarily Simple Motor Tics. Frequencies of tic symptoms showed few differences across youth and adults. Tic clusters had small associations with clinical characteristics and showed no associations to the presence of coexisting psychiatric conditions. Cluster membership scores did not predict treatment response to CBIT or tic severity reductions. Tic symptoms distinctly cluster with little difference across youth and adults, or coexisting conditions. This study, which is the first to examine tic clusters and response to treatment, suggested that tic symptom profiles respond equally well to CBIT. Clinical trials.gov. identifiers: NCT00218777; NCT00231985.
聚类分析方法已对慢性抽动障碍(CTD)的症状表现进行了研究,但各研究之间的一致性有限。本研究调查了抽动症状的模式、临床关联因素及治疗结果。239名患有CTD的青少年和成年人在基线时完成了一系列评估,以确定诊断、抽动严重程度及临床特征。参与者被随机分配接受抽动综合行为干预(CBIT)或心理教育及支持性治疗(PST)。对基线时的耶鲁全球抽动严重程度量表(YGTSS)症状清单进行聚类分析,以确定抽动症状的组合。识别出四个抽动簇:冲动控制及复杂发声抽动;复杂运动抽动;简单头部运动/发声抽动;以及主要为简单运动抽动。抽动症状的频率在青少年和成年人之间几乎没有差异。抽动簇与临床特征的关联较小,与共病精神疾病的存在无关联。聚类成员得分无法预测对CBIT的治疗反应或抽动严重程度的降低。抽动症状明显聚类,在青少年和成年人之间或共病情况方面差异不大。本研究首次考察了抽动簇及对治疗的反应,表明抽动症状概况对CBIT的反应同样良好。Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00218777;NCT00231985。