Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3850, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jan;35(4):224-32. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht445. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
We assessed the effect of concomitant aspirin use on the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
In ARISTOTLE, 18 201 patients were randomized to apixaban 5 mg twice daily or warfarin. Concomitant aspirin use was left to the discretion of the treating physician. In this predefined analysis, simple and marginal structured models were used to adjust for baseline and time-dependent confounders associated with aspirin use. Outcome measures included stroke or systemic embolism, ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, mortality, major bleeding, haemorrhagic stroke, major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and any bleeding. On Day 1, 4434 (24%) patients were taking aspirin. Irrespective of concomitant aspirin use, apixaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism [with aspirin: apixaban 1.12% vs. warfarin 1.91%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.85 vs. without aspirin: apixaban 1.11% vs. warfarin 1.32%, HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.07; P interaction = 0.10] and caused less major bleeding than warfarin (with aspirin: apixaban 3.10% vs. warfarin 3.92%, HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99 vs. without aspirin: apixaban 1.82% vs. warfarin 2.78%, HR without aspirin 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.78; P interaction = 0.29). Similar results were seen in the subgroups of patients with and without arterial vascular disease.
Apixaban had similar beneficial effects on stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding compared with warfarin, irrespective of concomitant aspirin use.
我们评估了与华法林相比,在伴有房颤(AF)的患者中同时使用阿司匹林对阿哌沙班疗效和安全性的影响。
在 ARISTOTLE 中,18201 名患者被随机分配至每日两次服用 5 毫克阿哌沙班或华法林。同时使用阿司匹林由治疗医生自行决定。在本预先设定的分析中,使用简单和边缘结构模型来调整与阿司匹林使用相关的基线和时变混杂因素。结局指标包括卒中或全身性栓塞、缺血性卒中、心肌梗死、死亡率、大出血、脑出血、主要或临床上显著的非主要出血以及任何出血。在第 1 天,4434 名(24%)患者正在服用阿司匹林。无论是否同时使用阿司匹林,阿哌沙班均可降低卒中或全身性栓塞[同时使用阿司匹林:阿哌沙班 1.12% vs. 华法林 1.91%,风险比(HR)0.58,95%置信区间(CI)0.39-0.85 vs. 未同时使用阿司匹林:阿哌沙班 1.11% vs. 华法林 1.32%,HR 0.84,95% CI 0.66-1.07;P 交互=0.10],且大出血发生率低于华法林(同时使用阿司匹林:阿哌沙班 3.10% vs. 华法林 3.92%,HR 0.77,95% CI 0.60-0.99 vs. 未同时使用阿司匹林:阿哌沙班 1.82% vs. 华法林 2.78%,HR 未同时使用阿司匹林 0.65,95% CI 0.55-0.78;P 交互=0.29)。在伴有和不伴有动脉血管疾病的患者亚组中也观察到了类似的结果。
无论同时使用阿司匹林与否,与华法林相比,阿哌沙班对卒中或全身性栓塞和大出血均具有相似的有益作用。