Division of Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Am Heart J. 2013 Sep;166(3):549-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
Patients with atrial fibrillation who are vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-naive may have a higher risk of thrombosis and/or bleeding than VKA-experienced patients.
Using data from ARISTOTLE, we assessed baseline characteristics and the treatment effect of apixaban versus warfarin in the VKA-naive and VKA-experienced cohorts. We compared rates of study drug discontinuation and time-in-therapeutic range. Overall, 7,800 (43%) were VKA naive, and 10,401 were VKA experienced. At baseline, both groups were similar with respect to age and congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke score (CHADS2). Fewer VKA-naive patients had a history of prior stroke (18% vs 21%) or prior bleeding (10% vs 22%) and were more often female (39% vs 33%). The effect of apixaban on the primary efficacy and safety outcomes was similar in VKA-naive (stroke/systemic embolism: hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.11 and major bleeding: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91) and VKA-experienced populations (stroke/systemic embolism: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.95, P value for interaction = 0.39 and major bleeding: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.55-0.80, P value for interaction = 0.50). Permanent study drug discontinuation was numerically less likely in patients receiving apixaban whether they were VKA naive (HR for discontinuation: 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.95) or VKA experienced (HR for discontinuation: 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.02). Among patients receiving warfarin, the mean/median times in therapeutic range were lower in the VKA-naive group (VKA-naive: 57.5/61.4, VKA-experienced: 66.0/69.1, P < .001).
The treatment effects of apixaban (vs warfarin) were not modified by VKA naivety. The rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were numerically lower among the patients assigned to apixaban, irrespective of prior VKA use.
与华法林治疗经验患者相比,新接受华法林抗凝治疗的房颤患者发生血栓栓塞和/或出血的风险可能更高。
我们利用 ARISTOTLE 研究的数据,评估了阿哌沙班与华法林在新接受华法林抗凝治疗(VKA- 初治)和有华法林治疗经验(VKA- 经治)两组患者中的基线特征和治疗效果。我们比较了两组患者的研究药物停药率和治疗范围内时间。总体而言,7800 例(43%)患者为 VKA- 初治,10401 例患者为 VKA- 经治。两组患者的基线特征相似,包括年龄、充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄、糖尿病、卒中评分(CHADS2)。与 VKA- 经治患者相比,VKA- 初治患者既往卒中(18% vs. 21%)或出血(10% vs. 22%)病史更少,女性比例更高(39% vs. 33%)。在 VKA- 初治和 VKA- 经治患者中,阿哌沙班对主要疗效和安全性结局的影响相似(卒中和全身性栓塞:风险比[HR]0.86,95%CI0.67-1.11 和大出血:HR0.73,95%CI0.59-0.91)(卒中和全身性栓塞:HR0.73,95%CI0.57-0.95,P 值交互作用=0.39 和大出血:HR0.66,95%CI0.55-0.80,P 值交互作用=0.50)。无论 VKA 初治(阿哌沙班停药风险:HR0.87,95%CI0.79-0.95)还是 VKA 经治(阿哌沙班停药风险:HR0.93,95%CI0.85-1.02),接受阿哌沙班治疗的患者停药的可能性均低于接受华法林治疗的患者。在接受华法林治疗的患者中,VKA- 初治组的治疗范围内时间平均值/中位数较低(VKA- 初治:57.5/61.4,VKA- 经治:66.0/69.1,P<0.001)。
与华法林相比,阿哌沙班(vs. 华法林)的治疗效果不受 VKA 初治的影响。无论患者是否有华法林治疗史,接受阿哌沙班治疗的患者发生卒中和全身性栓塞以及大出血的风险均较低,且呈数值降低趋势。