From the *Department of Psychiatry, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital; †Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung; ‡Department of Community Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital, Kaohsiung City; §Graduate Institute of Health Care, Meiho University, Ping-Tong County; ∥School of Health Care Administration, Taipei Medical University, Taipei; ¶Division of Corporate Communications and Government Affairs, Janssen Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan; and #School of Health Sciences, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Feb;34(1):23-9. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182a6a142.
We aimed at evaluating the relationship between medication and treatment effectiveness in a home care setting among patients with schizophrenia. Patients with schizophrenia hospitalized between 2004 and 2009 with a primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code of 295 were identified from Psychiatric Inpatient Medical Claims Data released by the National Health Research Institute in Taiwan. Patients who joined the home care program after discharge and were prescribed long-acting injection (LAI) (the LAI group) or oral antipsychotic medications (the oral group) were included as study subjects. The final sample for the study included 810 participants in the LAI group and 945 in the oral group. Logistic regression was performed to examine the independent effect of LAI medication on the risk for rehospitalization within the 12-month observation window after controlling for patient and hospital characteristics and propensity score quintile adjustment. The unadjusted odds ratio for rehospitalization risk was 0.80 (confidence interval, 0.65-0.98) for the LAI group compared to the oral group. The adjusted odds ratio was further reduced to 0.78 (confidence interval, 0.63-0.97). Results remained unchanged when the propensity score quintiles were entered into the regression for further adjustment. In a home care setting, patients treated with long-acting antipsychotic agents are at a significantly lower risk for psychiatric rehospitalization than those treated with oral medication. Consequently, LAI home-based treatment for the prevention of schizophrenia relapse may lead to substantial clinical and economic benefits.
我们旨在评估在家庭护理环境中精神分裂症患者药物治疗与治疗效果之间的关系。从台湾国家健康研究所在线发布的精神科住院医疗索赔数据中,确定了 2004 年至 2009 年间住院的精神分裂症患者,他们的主要国际疾病分类,第九版,临床修正代码为 295。出院后参加家庭护理计划并被开处长效注射(LAI)(LAI 组)或口服抗精神病药物(口服组)的患者被纳入研究对象。本研究的最终样本包括 LAI 组的 810 名参与者和口服组的 945 名参与者。使用逻辑回归在控制患者和医院特征以及倾向得分五分位数调整后,检验 LAI 药物对 12 个月观察期内再住院风险的独立影响。与口服组相比,LAI 组的再住院风险的未调整比值比为 0.80(置信区间,0.65-0.98)。调整后的比值比进一步降至 0.78(置信区间,0.63-0.97)。当将倾向得分五分位数输入回归进行进一步调整时,结果保持不变。在家庭护理环境中,接受长效抗精神病药物治疗的患者的精神科再住院风险明显低于接受口服药物治疗的患者。因此,长效抗精神病药物的基于家庭的治疗方法可能会预防精神分裂症复发,可以带来显著的临床和经济效益。