• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Antipsychotics in Preventing Readmission for First-Admission Schizophrenia Patients in National Cohorts From 2001 to 2017 in Taiwan.2001 年至 2017 年台湾全国队列中首次入院精神分裂症患者抗精神病药预防再入院的比较效果。
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Jun 21;48(4):785-794. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac046.
2
In-Hospital Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics and Readmission Risk in Patients With First-Admission Schizophrenia in Taiwan.台湾地区首发精神分裂症患者住院期间使用长效注射抗精神病药物与再入院风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417006. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17006.
3
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of schizophrenic patient care settings: impact of an atypical antipsychotic under long-acting injection formulation].[精神分裂症患者护理环境的成本效益分析:长效注射制剂下非典型抗精神病药物的影响]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82390-5.
4
Comparison of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics With Oral Antipsychotics and Suicide and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Schizophrenia.长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药治疗新发精神分裂症患者的比较:自杀和全因死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218810. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8810.
5
A Comparison of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics With Oral Antipsychotics on Time to Rehospitalization Within 1 Year of Discharge in Elderly Patients With Schizophrenia.比较长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药在老年精神分裂症患者出院后 1 年内再次入院时间的差异。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;28(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
6
Comparative effectiveness of risperidone long-acting injectable vs first-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectables in schizophrenia: results from a nationwide, retrospective inception cohort study.利培酮长效注射剂与第一代抗精神病长效注射剂治疗精神分裂症的比较疗效:一项全国性回顾性起始队列研究的结果
Schizophr Bull. 2015 May;41(3):627-36. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu128. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
7
Effectiveness of long-acting injectable risperidone versus oral antipsychotics in the treatment of recent-onset schizophrenia: a case-control study.长效注射利培酮与口服抗精神病药治疗近期发病精神分裂症的疗效比较:一项病例对照研究。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Jul;28(4):164-70. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283611cc3.
8
Long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of randomised, cohort, and pre-post studies.长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症的维持治疗:随机、队列和前后研究的系统评价和比较荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 May;8(5):387-404. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00039-0. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
9
Long-term Outcomes of Early Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia.长效注射抗精神病药在精神分裂症中的早期使用的长期结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 1;83(4):21r14153. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21r14153.
10
Real-World Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Treatments in a Nationwide Cohort of 29 823 Patients With Schizophrenia.29823例精神分裂症患者全国队列中抗精神病药物治疗的真实世界有效性
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;74(7):686-693. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1322.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Validity of Claims-Based Diagnostic Codes for Psychotic and Affective Disorders and the Influence of the Coding Transition from the ICD-9 to the ICD-10 in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.评估基于索赔的精神病性和情感性障碍诊断编码的有效性以及台湾全民健康保险研究数据库中从国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)到国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)编码转换的影响。
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 10;17:635-645. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S522618. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of functional recovery in patients with schizophrenia, with a focus on early-phase disease: results from a Delphi consensus and narrative review.精神分裂症患者功能恢复的评估,重点关注疾病早期:德尔菲共识和叙述性综述的结果
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06725-3.
3
Antipsychotic continuation during pregnancy and risk of postpartum relapse in women with schizophrenia: nationwide register-based study.精神分裂症女性孕期抗精神病药物持续治疗与产后复发风险:基于全国登记的研究
Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Sep;227(3):614-621. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.247. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
4
In-Hospital Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics and Readmission Risk in Patients With First-Admission Schizophrenia in Taiwan.台湾地区首发精神分裂症患者住院期间使用长效注射抗精神病药物与再入院风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417006. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17006.
5
Patients with first-episode psychosis in northern Taiwan: neurocognitive performance and niacin response profile in comparison with schizophrenia patients of different familial loadings and relationship with clinical features.台湾北部首发精神病患者:与不同家族负荷的精神分裂症患者比较的神经认知表现和烟酸反应特征及其与临床特征的关系。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05598-2.
6
Invega Hafyera (Paliperidone Palmitate): Extended-Release Injectable Suspension for Patients With Schizophrenia.氨磺必利长效注射混悬液(帕利哌酮棕榈酸酯):用于精神分裂症患者的缓释注射混悬液。
J Pharm Technol. 2023 Apr;39(2):88-94. doi: 10.1177/87551225231153541. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-Based Expert Consensus Regarding Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia from the Taiwanese Society of Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology (TSBPN).来自台湾生物精神医学暨神经精神药理学学会(TSBPN)的关于长效注射用抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症的循证专家共识。
CNS Drugs. 2021 Aug;35(8):893-905. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00838-5. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
2
Efficacy of long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotic drugs in early psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药治疗早期精神病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;16(6):589-599. doi: 10.1111/eip.13202. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
3
Reduced Function Variants and Genotype/Phenotype Translations of CYP2D6 Intermediate Metabolizers: Implications for Personalized Drug Dosing in Psychiatry.CYP2D6中间代谢者的功能降低变体及基因型/表型转化:对精神病学个性化药物剂量的影响
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 22;12:650750. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.650750. eCollection 2021.
4
Long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of randomised, cohort, and pre-post studies.长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症的维持治疗:随机、队列和前后研究的系统评价和比较荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 May;8(5):387-404. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00039-0. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
5
Antipsychotic treatment and risk of discontinuation and hospitalization in first-episode schizophrenia: a nationwide population-based study.抗精神病药物治疗与首发精神分裂症停药和住院风险:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):181-188. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001379. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Persistent Barriers to the Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.长效注射抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症的持续障碍。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jul/Aug;40(4):346-349. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001225.
7
Patterns of long acting injectable antipsychotic use and associated clinical factors in schizophrenia among 15 Asian countries and region.15 个亚洲国家和地区精神分裂症患者中长效注射抗精神病药物的使用模式及相关临床因素。
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;12(4):e12393. doi: 10.1111/appy.12393. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database: past and future.台湾全民健康保险研究数据库:过去与未来。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 May 3;11:349-358. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S196293. eCollection 2019.
9
Factors associated with health service utilisation for common mental disorders: a systematic review.常见心理障碍的卫生服务利用相关因素:系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1837-1.
10
Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable vs Oral Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Studies.长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症患者的疗效比较:前瞻性和回顾性队列研究的荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Apr 6;44(3):603-619. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx090.

2001 年至 2017 年台湾全国队列中首次入院精神分裂症患者抗精神病药预防再入院的比较效果。

Comparative Effectiveness of Antipsychotics in Preventing Readmission for First-Admission Schizophrenia Patients in National Cohorts From 2001 to 2017 in Taiwan.

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

National Center for Geriatrics and Welfare Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2022 Jun 21;48(4):785-794. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac046.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbac046
PMID:35569004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9212105/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Antipsychotics remain the main treatment for schizophrenia, but their effectiveness is challenging to compare. We aimed to assess the comparative real-world effectiveness of antipsychotics in preventing readmission among patients in Asia with early-stage schizophrenia to inform clinical decision making.

STUDY DESIGN

We did a retrospective cohort study of first-admission schizophrenia patients (ICD-9-CM: 295; ICD-10-CM: F20 and F25) from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2017. The cohort was identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database NHIRD for Psychiatric Inpatients. The exposure was any antipsychotics prescribed post-discharge. The primary outcome was the readmission risk due to psychotic disorders, which was measured by adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Within-individual extended Cox models were applied for analyses, where the periods of oral risperidone use served as his or her own control.

STUDY RESULTS

We selected 75 986 patients (men, 53.4%; mean [SD] age, 37.6 [12.0] years; mean [SD] duration of follow-up, 8.9 [5.0]) who were first admitted to psychiatric wards with schizophrenia in Taiwan. Among them, 47 150 patients (62.05%) had at least one readmission within 4 years. Compared to the period under treatment with oral risperidone, that under monotherapy with long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) had the lowest risk for psychotic readmission, with a risk reduction of 15-20%. However, the prevalence of person-prescription prevalence of LAIs remained low (< 10%) during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LAIs after the first admission for schizophrenia has notable advantages in preventing readmission. Such formulations should be offered earlier in the course of illness.

摘要

背景和假设

抗精神病药仍然是治疗精神分裂症的主要方法,但它们的疗效难以比较。我们旨在评估亚洲早期精神分裂症患者中抗精神病药预防再入院的真实世界比较效果,以为临床决策提供信息。

研究设计

我们对 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间从国家健康保险研究数据库精神病住院患者中首次入院的精神分裂症患者(ICD-9-CM:295;ICD-10-CM:F20 和 F25)进行了回顾性队列研究。该队列是从 NHIRD 中确定的。暴露是指出院后开的任何抗精神病药。主要结局是由于精神障碍导致的再入院风险,通过调整后的风险比(aHR)来衡量。采用个体内扩展 Cox 模型进行分析,其中口服利培酮的使用期间作为他/她自己的对照。

研究结果

我们选择了 75986 名在台湾首次入住精神病病房的精神分裂症患者(男性,53.4%;平均[标准差]年龄,37.6[12.0]岁;平均[标准差]随访时间,8.9[5.0])。其中,47150 名患者(62.05%)在 4 年内至少有一次再入院。与口服利培酮治疗期间相比,长效注射抗精神病药(LAIs)单药治疗的精神病再入院风险最低,风险降低 15-20%。然而,在随访期间,LAIs 的个人处方普及率仍然很低(<10%)。

结论

精神分裂症首次入院后使用 LAIs 在预防再入院方面具有显著优势。应在疾病早期提供这些制剂。