Suppr超能文献

2001 年至 2017 年台湾全国队列中首次入院精神分裂症患者抗精神病药预防再入院的比较效果。

Comparative Effectiveness of Antipsychotics in Preventing Readmission for First-Admission Schizophrenia Patients in National Cohorts From 2001 to 2017 in Taiwan.

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

National Center for Geriatrics and Welfare Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2022 Jun 21;48(4):785-794. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac046.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Antipsychotics remain the main treatment for schizophrenia, but their effectiveness is challenging to compare. We aimed to assess the comparative real-world effectiveness of antipsychotics in preventing readmission among patients in Asia with early-stage schizophrenia to inform clinical decision making.

STUDY DESIGN

We did a retrospective cohort study of first-admission schizophrenia patients (ICD-9-CM: 295; ICD-10-CM: F20 and F25) from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2017. The cohort was identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database NHIRD for Psychiatric Inpatients. The exposure was any antipsychotics prescribed post-discharge. The primary outcome was the readmission risk due to psychotic disorders, which was measured by adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Within-individual extended Cox models were applied for analyses, where the periods of oral risperidone use served as his or her own control.

STUDY RESULTS

We selected 75 986 patients (men, 53.4%; mean [SD] age, 37.6 [12.0] years; mean [SD] duration of follow-up, 8.9 [5.0]) who were first admitted to psychiatric wards with schizophrenia in Taiwan. Among them, 47 150 patients (62.05%) had at least one readmission within 4 years. Compared to the period under treatment with oral risperidone, that under monotherapy with long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) had the lowest risk for psychotic readmission, with a risk reduction of 15-20%. However, the prevalence of person-prescription prevalence of LAIs remained low (< 10%) during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LAIs after the first admission for schizophrenia has notable advantages in preventing readmission. Such formulations should be offered earlier in the course of illness.

摘要

背景和假设

抗精神病药仍然是治疗精神分裂症的主要方法,但它们的疗效难以比较。我们旨在评估亚洲早期精神分裂症患者中抗精神病药预防再入院的真实世界比较效果,以为临床决策提供信息。

研究设计

我们对 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间从国家健康保险研究数据库精神病住院患者中首次入院的精神分裂症患者(ICD-9-CM:295;ICD-10-CM:F20 和 F25)进行了回顾性队列研究。该队列是从 NHIRD 中确定的。暴露是指出院后开的任何抗精神病药。主要结局是由于精神障碍导致的再入院风险,通过调整后的风险比(aHR)来衡量。采用个体内扩展 Cox 模型进行分析,其中口服利培酮的使用期间作为他/她自己的对照。

研究结果

我们选择了 75986 名在台湾首次入住精神病病房的精神分裂症患者(男性,53.4%;平均[标准差]年龄,37.6[12.0]岁;平均[标准差]随访时间,8.9[5.0])。其中,47150 名患者(62.05%)在 4 年内至少有一次再入院。与口服利培酮治疗期间相比,长效注射抗精神病药(LAIs)单药治疗的精神病再入院风险最低,风险降低 15-20%。然而,在随访期间,LAIs 的个人处方普及率仍然很低(<10%)。

结论

精神分裂症首次入院后使用 LAIs 在预防再入院方面具有显著优势。应在疾病早期提供这些制剂。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验