• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低位直肠癌手术后的结局:腹腔镜与开放腹会阴联合切除术的比较

Outcomes Following Surgery for Distal Rectal Cancers: A Comparison between Laparoscopic and Open Abdomino-Perineal Resection.

作者信息

Tan K K, Chong C S, Tsang C B, Koh D C

机构信息

National University Health System, Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore.

出版信息

Med J Malaysia. 2013 Aug;68(4):348-52.

PMID:24145265
Abstract

PURPOSE

Oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection (APR) for distal rectal cancer are infrequently reported. This study aims to compare the long term outcomes between laparoscopic and open APR in distal rectal cancers.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent APR for distal rectal cancer from May 2001 to November 2009 was performed.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients, median age 60 (24 - 86) years, formed the study group. Laparoscopic resection was attempted in 16 patients and was successful in all but one. Patients with recurrent diseases, previous abdominal operations and neoadjuvant chemoradiation were more likely to undergo open APR. There were no differences in the T-staging, number of lymph nodes harvested or the final stage of the disease between the two groups. The laparoscopic APR group had a shorter median length of hospitalization (7 vs. 10 days, p < 0.05), but longer operative duration (300 vs. 240 minutes, p > 0.05). Excluding the 9 (21.4%) patients with metastatic disease on presentation, 13 (39.4%) developed recurrence after a median follow up of 24 (4 - 107) months. Twenty (47.6%) patients died from their advanced disease subsequently while one (2.4%) died from a noncancer related cause. Analysis showed that tumour stage and circumferential resection margin positivity were associated with a poorer survival. The types of approach had no significant impact on the survival.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic APR for distal rectal cancer yields similar oncologic outcomes as open APR. Long-term outcome is determined by the tumour stage and circumferential resection margin and not the approach.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术(APR)治疗低位直肠癌的肿瘤学结局鲜有报道。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜与开放APR治疗低位直肠癌的长期结局。

方法

对2001年5月至2009年11月期间所有接受APR治疗低位直肠癌的患者进行回顾性研究。

结果

42例患者构成研究组,中位年龄60(24 - 86)岁。16例患者尝试行腹腔镜切除术,除1例失败外其余均成功。复发性疾病、既往腹部手术史及新辅助放化疗患者更可能接受开放APR。两组间T分期、清扫淋巴结数目或疾病最终分期无差异。腹腔镜APR组中位住院时间较短(7天对10天,p < 0.05),但手术时间较长(300分钟对240分钟,p > 0.05)。排除9例(21.4%)初诊时即有转移的患者,中位随访24(4 - 107)个月后,13例(39.4%)出现复发。20例(47.6%)患者随后死于晚期疾病,1例(2.4%)死于非癌症相关原因。分析显示肿瘤分期和环周切缘阳性与较差的生存率相关。手术方式对生存率无显著影响。

结论

腹腔镜APR治疗低位直肠癌的肿瘤学结局与开放APR相似。长期结局取决于肿瘤分期和环周切缘,而非手术方式。

相似文献

1
Outcomes Following Surgery for Distal Rectal Cancers: A Comparison between Laparoscopic and Open Abdomino-Perineal Resection.低位直肠癌手术后的结局:腹腔镜与开放腹会阴联合切除术的比较
Med J Malaysia. 2013 Aug;68(4):348-52.
2
Laparoscopic translevator approach to abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: feasibility and short-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜经提肛肌途径行直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术:可行性及短期肿瘤学结局
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):3001-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4589-8. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
3
Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.124例未经挑选的患者接受腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术的长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1530-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8874-y. Epub 2003 Jul 21.
4
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌(COLOR II):一项随机、3 期临床试验的短期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
5
Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.腹腔镜直肠癌切除术比开放手术获得更高的淋巴结检出数和更好的短期疗效:一项大型单中心对比研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jun;56(6):679-88. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318287c594.
6
Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期及肿瘤学结局比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2798-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
7
[Curative resection with minilaparotomy approach in the treatment of rectal cancer].小切口剖腹术入路根治性切除治疗直肠癌
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 25;21(3):305-311.
8
Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的近期和远期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Aug;55(8):854-63. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825b9052.
9
There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的疗效无差异:短期和长期肿瘤学结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1662-4. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
10
The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.腹腔镜检查在直肠癌患者环周切缘阳性中的作用:单家高容量机构的长期结果
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Apr;25(2):129-37. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000060.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: a case report.单切口加单孔腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术并双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗晚期直肠癌:一例报告
Int Surg. 2015 Jan;100(1):15-20. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00232.1.