Department of Academic Anaesthesia, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2013 Dec;68(12):1247-52. doi: 10.1111/anae.12452. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
Inter-arm differences in blood pressure may confound haemodynamic management in vascular surgery. We evaluated 898 patients in the vascular pre-assessment clinic to determine the prevalence of inter-arm differences in systolic and mean arterial pressure, quantify the consequent risk of clinical error in siting monitoring peri-operatively and evaluate systolic inter-arm difference as a predictor of all-cause mortality (median follow-up 49 months). The prevalence of a systolic inter-arm difference ≥ 15 mmHg was 26% (95% CI 23-29%). The prevalence of an inter-arm mean arterial pressure difference ≥ 10 mmHg was 26% (95% CI 23-29%) and 11% (95% CI 9-13%) for a difference ≥ 15 mmHg. Monitoring could be erroneously sited in an arm reading lower for systolic pressure once in every seven to nine patients. The hazard ratio for a systolic inter-arm difference ≥ 15 mmHg vs < 15 mmHg was 1.03 (95% CI 0.78-1.36, p = 0.84). Large inter-arm blood pressure differences are common in this population, with a high potential for monitoring errors. Systolic inter-arm difference was not associated with medium-term mortality. [Correction added on 17 October 2013, after first online publication: In the Summary the sentence beginning 'We evaluated 898 patients' was corrected from (median (IQR [range]) follow-up 49 months) to read (median follow up 49 months)].
双臂血压差异可能会混淆血管外科的血液动力学管理。我们评估了血管评估诊所的 898 名患者,以确定收缩压和平均动脉压的双臂差异的发生率,量化术中监测位置错误的临床风险,并评估收缩压双臂差异作为全因死亡率的预测指标(中位随访时间为 49 个月)。收缩压双臂差异≥15mmHg 的发生率为 26%(95%CI 23-29%)。双臂平均动脉压差异≥10mmHg 的发生率为 26%(95%CI 23-29%),差异≥15mmHg 的发生率为 11%(95%CI 9-13%)。每七到九个患者中就会有一个患者的手臂读数较低,从而导致收缩压监测位置错误。收缩压双臂差异≥15mmHg 与<15mmHg 相比的风险比为 1.03(95%CI 0.78-1.36,p=0.84)。在该人群中,双臂血压差异较大很常见,监测错误的可能性很大。收缩压双臂差异与中期死亡率无关。