Jacobsen Garth R, Barajas-Gamboa Juan S, Coker Alisa M, Cheverie Joslin, Macias C Aitor, Sandler Bryan J, Talamini Mark A, Horgan Santiago
Department of Surgery, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):484-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3227-6. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery procedures have evolved over the past few years. A transvaginal approach is a promising alternative for intraperitoneal procedures. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transvaginal organ extraction.
This institutional review board-approved protocol involved retrospective review of an ongoing prospective study. Female subjects who presented to our hospital for elective cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or sleeve gastrectomy were offered participation in the study. Eligible patients met the following criteria: age between 18 and 75, diagnosis of gallbladder disease, acute appendicitis, or morbid obesity who desired surgical treatment. A hybrid transvaginal natural orifice approach was used in this series.
Thirty-four women underwent transvaginal organ extraction between September 2007 and January 2012. The mean age was 40 ± 12.1 years (range 23-63 years). The mean body mass index was 27 ± 6.4 kg/m(2) (range 16-43 kg/m(2)). All patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of two or below. The mean operative time for cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and sleeve gastrectomy was 90, 71, and 135 min, respectively. There were no conversions to open operation and no intraoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was 2 days for all cases. Patients were followed for a mean of 24 months (range 1-61 months). There were two pregnancies and two successful vaginal deliveries. Six patients (18 %) had minor complaints of spotting or heavy menses in the immediate postoperative period that resolved with conservative measures. There were no abdominal wall complications. There were no long-term complications and no mortalities.
This initial experience suggests that this surgical approach is safe, does not increase length of stay, and has no long-term vaginal complications. Given this attractive profile, a transvaginal approach may prove to be a superior mode of organ extraction, although randomized studies and long-term follow-up are needed.
在过去几年中,经自然腔道内镜手术技术不断发展。经阴道途径是腹腔内手术的一种有前景的替代方法。我们的目的是评估经阴道器官取出术的安全性和可行性。
本研究经机构审查委员会批准,涉及对一项正在进行的前瞻性研究的回顾性分析。向我院择期行胆囊切除术、阑尾切除术或袖状胃切除术的女性受试者提供参与本研究的机会。符合条件的患者满足以下标准:年龄在18至75岁之间,诊断为胆囊疾病、急性阑尾炎或病态肥胖且希望接受手术治疗。本系列研究采用了经阴道自然腔道混合手术方法。
2007年9月至2012年1月期间,34名女性接受了经阴道器官取出术。平均年龄为40±12.1岁(范围23 - 63岁)。平均体重指数为27±6.4kg/m²(范围16 - 43kg/m²)。所有患者美国麻醉医师协会分级均为二级或以下。胆囊切除术、阑尾切除术和袖状胃切除术的平均手术时间分别为90分钟、71分钟和135分钟。无一例转为开放手术,无术中并发症。所有病例的平均住院时间为2天。患者平均随访24个月(范围1 - 61个月)。有2例妊娠并成功经阴道分娩。6例患者(18%)在术后早期有少量阴道出血或月经量过多的轻微主诉,经保守治疗后缓解。无腹壁并发症。无长期并发症,无死亡病例。
这一初步经验表明,这种手术方法是安全的,不增加住院时间,且无长期阴道并发症。鉴于此良好表现,经阴道途径可能被证明是一种更优的器官取出方式,不过仍需要进行随机研究和长期随访。