Kar Julia, Knutsen Andrew K, Cupps Brian P, Pasque Michael K
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St Louis, MO, 63110, USA,
Ann Biomed Eng. 2014 Mar;42(3):541-54. doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0931-2. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
Fast cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) has comparative advantages over tagged MRI (TMRI) including higher spatial resolution and faster post-processing. This study computed regional radial and circumferential myocardial strains with DENSE displacements and validated it in reference to TMRI, according to American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for standardized segmentation of regions in the left ventricle (LV). This study was therefore novel in examining agreement between the modalities in 16 AHA recommended LV segments. DENSE displacements were obtained with spatiotemporal phase unwrapping and TMRI displacements obtained with a conventional tag-finding algorithm. A validation study with a rotating phantom established similar shear strain between modalities prior to in vivo studies. A novel meshfree nearest node finite element method (NNFEM) was used for rapid computation of Lagrange strain in both phantom and in vivo studies in both modalities. Also novel was conducting in vivo repeatability studies for observing recurring strain patterns in DENSE and increase confidence in it. Comprehensive regional strain agreements via Bland-Altman analysis between the modalities were obtained. Results from the phantom study showed similar radial-circumferential shear strains from the two modalities. Mean differences in regional in vivo circumferential strains were -0.01 ± 0.09 (95% limits of agreement) from comparing the modalities and -0.01 ± 0.07 from repeatability studies. Differences and means from comparison and repeatability studies were uncorrelated (p > 0.05) indicating no increases in differences with increased strain magnitudes. Bland-Altman analysis and similarities in regional strain distribution within the myocardium showed good agreements between DENSE and TMRI and show their interchangeability. NNFEM was also established as a common framework for computing strain in both modalities.
快速cine激发回波位移编码(DENSE)相对于标记MRI(TMRI)具有比较优势,包括更高的空间分辨率和更快的后处理速度。本研究根据美国心脏协会(AHA)左心室(LV)区域标准化分割指南,利用DENSE位移计算区域径向和圆周心肌应变,并参照TMRI进行验证。因此,本研究在检查16个AHA推荐的LV节段中两种模式之间的一致性方面具有创新性。通过时空相位展开获得DENSE位移,通过传统的标记查找算法获得TMRI位移。在体内研究之前,使用旋转体模进行的验证研究确定了两种模式之间相似的剪切应变。在体模和体内研究中,采用一种新颖的无网格最近节点有限元方法(NNFEM)快速计算两种模式下的拉格朗日应变。同样具有创新性的是进行体内重复性研究,以观察DENSE中反复出现的应变模式并增强对其的信心。通过Bland-Altman分析获得了两种模式之间全面的区域应变一致性。体模研究结果显示两种模式下的径向-圆周剪切应变相似。比较两种模式时,体内区域圆周应变的平均差异为-0.01±0.09(95%一致性界限),重复性研究的平均差异为-0.01±0.07。比较研究和重复性研究的差异及均值不相关(p>0.05),表明差异不会随应变幅度增加而增大。Bland-Altman分析以及心肌内区域应变分布的相似性表明DENSE和TMRI之间具有良好的一致性,并显示出它们的可互换性。NNFEM也被确立为计算两种模式下应变的通用框架。