Suppr超能文献

诊断恶性胸腔积液:我们如何进行比较?

Diagnosing malignant pleural effusions: how do we compare?

作者信息

Lim Ming Han, Garrettc Jeffrey, Mowlem Lydia, Yap Elaine

机构信息

Auckland City Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2013 Aug 30;126(1381):42-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Accurate and prompt diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is important as patients with suspected MPE often wait for many days before the diagnosis is secure.

AIMS

(1) To evaluate the diagnostic yield of pleural fluid cytology for patients admitted to Middlemore Hospital (MMH) in Auckland, New Zealand with MPE between 31 May 2010-1 June 2011. (2) To document the waiting time for cytology results to be made available and whether this contributed to length of stay. (3) To evaluate whether the volume of pleural fluid analysed contributed to diagnostic yield.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of pleural fluid cytology results on 36 consecutive patients admitted to MMH with a pleural effusion which was subsequently proven to be due to malignancy. Data was obtained from hospital medical records and Web Eclair databases.

RESULTS

54.8% (17/31) of patients had positive pleural fluid cytology. Initial pleural fluid cytology was positive in 16 (51.6%). Only 4/15 patients with negative pleural fluid cytology had a repeat aspiration (1 was positive). Median cytology turnaround time was 6.72 days, range 2.23-43.06 days. Average length of stay (ALOS) was 7.78 days, range 1.11-20.8 days. Cytology turnaround times seem shorter for inpatients and when a diagnosis of cancer is unknown but the ALOS is longer if patients have negative initial cytology and when a diagnosis of cancer is uncertain. Samples >50mL appear to have a higher diagnostic yield compared to samples less than and equal to 50mL but this was not statistically significant (77.8% to 41.2%, p=0.08).

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic yield from pleural fluid cytology at our hospital is comparable with other documented studies. ALOS appears to be influenced by a negative initial pleural fluid cytology and the uncertainty of diagnosis of cancer, not cytology turnaround time. The results suggest a more efficient diagnostic and treatment algorithm could be considered with emphasis on Day Stay investigation and treatment.

摘要

引言

准确及时地诊断恶性胸腔积液(MPE)很重要,因为疑似MPE的患者通常要等待多日才能确诊。

目的

(1)评估2010年5月31日至2011年6月1日期间入住新西兰奥克兰米德尔莫尔医院(MMH)的MPE患者胸腔积液细胞学检查的诊断率。(2)记录获得细胞学检查结果的等待时间,以及这是否影响住院时间。(3)评估分析的胸腔积液量是否影响诊断率。

方法

对连续36例入住MMH且胸腔积液随后被证实为恶性的患者的胸腔积液细胞学检查结果进行回顾性审计。数据从医院病历和Web Eclair数据库中获取。

结果

54.8%(17/31)的患者胸腔积液细胞学检查呈阳性。初次胸腔积液细胞学检查阳性的有16例(51.6%)。胸腔积液细胞学检查阴性的15例患者中只有4例进行了重复穿刺(1例阳性)。细胞学检查周转时间中位数为6.72天,范围为2.23 - 43.06天。平均住院时间(ALOS)为7.78天,范围为1.11 - 20.8天。住院患者以及癌症诊断不明时细胞学检查周转时间似乎较短,但如果患者初次细胞学检查为阴性且癌症诊断不确定,住院时间会更长。与小于或等于50mL的样本相比,大于50mL的样本诊断率似乎更高,但差异无统计学意义(77.8%对41.2%,p = 0.08)。

结论

我院胸腔积液细胞学检查的诊断率与其他已发表的研究相当。住院时间似乎受初次胸腔积液细胞学检查阴性和癌症诊断不确定性的影响,而非细胞学检查周转时间。结果表明,可以考虑一种更有效的诊断和治疗方案,重点是日间住院检查和治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验