Suppr超能文献

扰乱性伪装会损害物体识别。

Disruptive camouflage impairs object recognition.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Carleton University, , Ottawa, Canada , K1S 5B6.

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2013 Oct 23;9(6):20130501. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0501. Print 2013.

Abstract

Whether hiding from predators, or avoiding battlefield casualties, camouflage is widely employed to prevent detection. Disruptive coloration is a seemingly well-known camouflage mechanism proposed to function by breaking up an object's salient features (for example their characteristic outline), rendering objects more difficult to recognize. However, while a wide range of animals are thought to evade detection using disruptive patterns, there is no direct experimental evidence that disruptive coloration impairs recognition. Using humans searching for computer-generated moth targets, we demonstrate that the number of edge-intersecting patches on a target reduces the likelihood of it being detected, even at the expense of reduced background matching. Crucially, eye-tracking data show that targets with more edge-intersecting patches were looked at for longer periods prior to attack, and passed-over more frequently during search tasks. We therefore show directly that edge patches enhance survivorship by impairing recognition, confirming that disruptive coloration is a distinct camouflage strategy, not simply an artefact of background matching.

摘要

无论是躲避捕食者,还是避免战场伤亡,伪装都被广泛用于防止被发现。破坏色是一种看似众所周知的伪装机制,据推测其作用是打散物体的显著特征(例如其特征轮廓),从而使物体更难被识别。然而,虽然人们认为许多动物都使用破坏模式来躲避探测,但没有直接的实验证据表明破坏色会损害识别能力。我们使用人类搜索计算机生成的飞蛾目标的实验证明,目标上的边缘相交补丁数量会降低其被探测到的可能性,即使这会牺牲与背景的匹配度。至关重要的是,眼动追踪数据显示,带有更多边缘相交补丁的目标在攻击前会被观察更长时间,并且在搜索任务中被跳过的频率更高。因此,我们直接证明了边缘补丁通过损害识别来提高生存能力,证实了破坏色是一种独特的伪装策略,而不仅仅是背景匹配的一种假象。

相似文献

1
Disruptive camouflage impairs object recognition.
Biol Lett. 2013 Oct 23;9(6):20130501. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0501. Print 2013.
2
The effectiveness of disruptive coloration as a concealment strategy.
Prog Brain Res. 2006;155:49-64. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55004-6.
3
Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching.
Nature. 2005 Mar 3;434(7029):72-4. doi: 10.1038/nature03312.
5
Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching.
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2427-32. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3615.
6
Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability.
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 May 22;274(1615):1325-31. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0153.
7
Disruptive colouration and perceptual grouping.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e87153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087153. eCollection 2014.
8
Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing.
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 7;273(1598):2141-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3556.
9
Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance.
BMC Evol Biol. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0854-2.
10
Disruptive coloration and binocular disparity: breaking camouflage.
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 13;286(1896):20182045. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2045.

引用本文的文献

1
Camouflage Using Surface Disruption: The Importance of Corners Versus Edges.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):e72052. doi: 10.1002/ece3.72052. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Camouflage patterning modulates neural signatures of attention and decision-making.
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Aug;291(2028):20240865. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0865. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
4
Dazzled by shine: gloss as an antipredator strategy in fast moving prey.
Behav Ecol. 2023 Jun 8;34(5):862-871. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arad046. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
5
Varying benefits of generalist and specialist camouflage in two versus four background environments.
Behav Ecol. 2023 Mar 26;34(3):426-436. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arac114. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
6
Recognition of letters displayed as successive contour fragments.
AIMS Neurosci. 2022 Dec 12;9(4):491-515. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2022028. eCollection 2022.
7
Variable crab camouflage patterns defeat search image formation.
Commun Biol. 2021 Mar 5;4(1):287. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01817-8.
8
Evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.
PLoS One. 2020 May 20;15(5):e0224530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224530. eCollection 2020.
9
What's in a band? The function of the color and banding pattern of the Banded Swallowtail.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jan 28;10(4):2021-2029. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6034. eCollection 2020 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical patterns of visual search for hidden objects.
Sci Rep. 2012;2:920. doi: 10.1038/srep00920. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
2
Outline and surface disruption in animal camouflage.
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 22;276(1657):781-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1450.
3
Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):481-8. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0216.
4
Camouflage and visual perception.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):449-61. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0218.
5
Coincident disruptive coloration.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):489-96. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0266.
6
Contrasting coloration in terrestrial mammals.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):537-48. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0221.
7
Disruptive Coloration in Butterflies: Lack of Support in Anartia fatima.
Science. 1980 Aug 1;209(4456):617-9. doi: 10.1126/science.209.4456.617.
8
Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration.
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jun 22;274(1617):1457-64. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0220.
9
Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability.
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 May 22;274(1615):1325-31. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0153.
10
Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage.
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2433-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3614.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验