Nakaema Katia E, Cassefo Gustavo, Chiba Toshio
aInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - 'Octávio Frias de Oliveira', Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013 Oct 22. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e3283657652.
The aim of the review is to show main and recent evidence on and tendencies about artificial nutrition in advanced dementia.
Several studies in the last decade had been performed to provide evidence that supports lack of benefits or improvements in many aspects about caring of the elderly with advanced dementia. In spite of the evidence, we find an increased number of patients still submitted to artificial nutrition. There is high prevalence of misperceptions and misbeliefs about artificial nutrition among healthcare professionals in this scenario. Hand feeding for these patients is offered as an alternative arrangement, which may be characterized as dilemma. The decision-making process in artificial nutrition is considered as a difficult, complex and distressful issue, which addresses new strategies for improvement.
Despite the lack of evidence of benefits, the use of artificial nutrition remains commonplace in advanced dementia. Patient's wishes and family values should be taken into account in the decision-making process, as well as legal and ethical issues. Communication skills and acknowledgment of recent evidence are essential in decision-making in order to achieve the patient's best interests. Educational strategies and randomized prospective studies concerned about dying patients with advanced dementia are required.
本综述旨在展示关于晚期痴呆患者人工营养的主要及最新证据和趋势。
过去十年进行了多项研究,以提供证据支持在照顾晚期痴呆老年患者的许多方面缺乏益处或改善。尽管有这些证据,但我们发现仍有越来越多的患者接受人工营养。在这种情况下,医疗保健专业人员对人工营养存在高度的误解和错误观念。为这些患者提供手喂作为一种替代安排,这可能被视为一种困境。人工营养的决策过程被认为是一个困难、复杂且令人痛苦的问题,需要新的改进策略。
尽管缺乏益处的证据,但人工营养在晚期痴呆患者中的使用仍然很普遍。在决策过程中应考虑患者的意愿和家庭价值观,以及法律和伦理问题。沟通技巧和对最新证据的认识对于做出符合患者最佳利益的决策至关重要。需要针对晚期痴呆临终患者的教育策略和随机前瞻性研究。