• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于改善医患沟通的两种干预措施对低教育水平糖尿病患者自我管理的效果:初级保健中一项基于群组的随机试验研究方案。

Effectiveness of two interventions based on improving patient-practitioner communication on diabetes self-management in patients with low educational level: study protocol of a clustered randomized trial in primary care.

机构信息

Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, Cuesta del Observatorio 4, Apdo, 2070, 18080, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 23;13:433. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-433.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-13-433
PMID:24153053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4016588/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the last decades the presence of social inequalities in diabetes care has been observed in multiple countries, including Spain. These inequalities have been at least partially attributed to differences in diabetes self-management behaviours. Communication problems during medical consultations occur more frequently to patients with a lower educational level. The purpose of this cluster randomized trial is to determine whether an intervention implemented in a General Surgery, based in improving patient-provider communication, results in a better diabetes self-management in patients with lower educational level. A secondary objective is to assess whether telephone reinforcement enhances the effect of such intervention. We report the design and implementation of this on-going study.

METHODS/DESIGN: The study is being conducted in a General Practice located in a deprived neighbourhood of Granada, Spain. Diabetic patients 18 years old or older with a low educational level and inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c > 7%) were recruited. General Practitioners (GPs) were randomised to three groups: intervention A, intervention B and control group. GPs allocated to intervention groups A and B received training in communication skills and are providing graphic feedback about glycosylated haemoglobin levels. Patients whose GPs were allocated to group B are additionally receiving telephone reinforcement whereas patients from the control group are receiving usual care. The described interventions are being conducted during 7 consecutive medical visits which are scheduled every three months. The main outcome measure will be HbA1c; blood pressure, lipidemia, body mass index and waist circumference will be considered as secondary outcome measures. Statistical analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions will include multilevel regression analysis with three hierarchical levels: medical visit level, patient level and GP level.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will provide new knowledge about possible strategies to promote a better diabetes self-management in a particularly vulnerable group. If effective, this low cost intervention will have the potential to be easily incorporated into routine clinical practice, contributing to decrease health inequalities in diabetic patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials U.S. National Institutes of Health, NCT01849731.

摘要

背景

在过去的几十年中,多个国家包括西班牙在内,都观察到了糖尿病治疗中存在社会不平等现象。这些不平等现象至少部分归因于糖尿病自我管理行为的差异。在医疗咨询期间,文化程度较低的患者更容易出现沟通问题。本项集群随机试验的目的是确定在以改善医患沟通为基础的普通外科实施的干预措施是否会使文化程度较低的患者更好地进行糖尿病自我管理。次要目的是评估电话强化是否会增强这种干预的效果。我们报告了这项正在进行的研究的设计和实施情况。

方法/设计:该研究正在西班牙格拉纳达一个贫困社区的一家普通外科诊所进行。招募年龄在 18 岁或以上、文化程度较低且血糖控制不佳(HbA1c>7%)的糖尿病患者。将全科医生(GP)随机分为三组:干预 A 组、干预 B 组和对照组。为接受干预的 A 组和 B 组的全科医生提供沟通技巧培训,并提供有关糖化血红蛋白水平的图形反馈。被分配到 B 组的患者还会接受电话强化,而对照组的患者则接受常规护理。上述干预措施将在连续 7 次的医疗就诊中进行,每次就诊间隔 3 个月。主要结局指标为 HbA1c;血压、血脂、体重指数和腰围将被视为次要结局指标。评估干预效果的统计分析将包括具有三个层次的多层次回归分析:医疗就诊层次、患者层次和全科医生层次。

讨论

这项研究的结果将提供有关促进特别脆弱群体更好地进行糖尿病自我管理的可能策略的新知识。如果有效,这种低成本干预措施将有可能很容易地纳入常规临床实践,有助于减少糖尿病患者的健康不平等现象。

试验注册

美国国立卫生研究院临床试验 U.S. National Institutes of Health,NCT01849731。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b91a/4016588/b7b020132c1a/1472-6963-13-433-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b91a/4016588/f45128e5de43/1472-6963-13-433-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b91a/4016588/b7b020132c1a/1472-6963-13-433-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b91a/4016588/f45128e5de43/1472-6963-13-433-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b91a/4016588/b7b020132c1a/1472-6963-13-433-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of two interventions based on improving patient-practitioner communication on diabetes self-management in patients with low educational level: study protocol of a clustered randomized trial in primary care.基于改善医患沟通的两种干预措施对低教育水平糖尿病患者自我管理的效果:初级保健中一项基于群组的随机试验研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 23;13:433. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-433.
2
Effectiveness of an intervention to improve diabetes self-management on clinical outcomes in patients with low educational level.一项旨在改善低教育水平患者糖尿病自我管理的干预措施对临床结局的有效性。
Gac Sanit. 2017 Jan-Feb;31(1):40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
3
BetaMe: impact of a comprehensive digital health programme on HbA1c and weight at 12 months for people with diabetes and pre-diabetes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BetaMe:一项综合数字健康计划对糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者12个月时糖化血红蛋白和体重的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 5;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2528-4.
4
Improved self-management skills in Chinese diabetes patients through a comprehensive health literacy strategy: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.通过全面健康素养策略提高中国糖尿病患者的自我管理技能:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Dec 20;15:498. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-498.
5
Development and evaluation by a cluster randomised trial of a psychosocial intervention in children and teenagers experiencing diabetes: the DEPICTED study.通过群组随机试验开发和评估针对糖尿病患儿和青少年的心理社会干预措施:DEPICTED 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Aug;15(29):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta15290.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Technology-Intensified Diabetes Education Study (TIDES) in African Americans with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对非裔美国2型糖尿病患者的技术强化糖尿病教育研究(TIDES):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Nov 25;15:460. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-460.
8
Impact of a self-care education programme on patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care in the Basque Country.一项自我护理教育计划对巴斯克地区初级保健中2型糖尿病患者的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 29;13:521. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-521.
9
Effectiveness of a self-management intervention with personalised genetic and lifestyle-related risk information on coronary heart disease and diabetes-related risk in type 2 diabetes (CoRDia): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对2型糖尿病患者冠心病和糖尿病相关风险的自我管理干预措施,结合个性化遗传和生活方式相关风险信息的效果(CoRDia):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Dec 2;16:547. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1073-7.
10
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of adherence to self-care behavior among women with type 2 diabetes: an explanation based on health belief model.2型糖尿病女性自我护理行为依从性的决定因素:基于健康信念模型的解释
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 May 14;30:368. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Health care interventions to improve the quality of diabetes care in African Americans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善非裔美国人糖尿病护理质量的医疗保健干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Mar;36(3):760-8. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1057.
2
Relationship between HbA1c levels and risk of cardiovascular adverse outcomes and all-cause mortality in overweight and obese cardiovascular high-risk women and men with type 2 diabetes.HbA1c 水平与超重和肥胖 2 型糖尿病心血管高危男女患者心血管不良结局和全因死亡率的关系。
Diabetologia. 2012 Sep;55(9):2348-55. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2584-3. Epub 2012 May 26.
3
Diabetes self-management in patients with low health literacy: ordering findings from literature in a health literacy framework.
低健康素养患者的糖尿病自我管理:在健康素养框架下对文献中的发现进行排序。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jul;88(1):44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.11.015. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
4
Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in Spain: the Di@bet.es Study.西班牙的糖尿病和葡萄糖调节受损患病率:Di@bet.es 研究。
Diabetologia. 2012 Jan;55(1):88-93. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2336-9. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
5
Effects of the 2008 recession on health: a first look at European data.2008年经济衰退对健康的影响:对欧洲数据的初步观察。
Lancet. 2011 Jul 9;378(9786):124-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61079-9.
6
Socioeconomic position and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe 1999-2009: a panorama of inequalities.1999 - 2009年欧洲社会经济地位与2型糖尿病:不平等全景
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2011 May;7(3):148-58. doi: 10.2174/157339911795843131.
7
Why we don't spend enough on public health: an alternative view.为何我们对公共卫生的投入不足:另一种观点。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(1):117-20. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.1.h.
8
Sex-specific differences in glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in older patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus.胰岛素治疗的老年2型糖尿病患者血糖控制及心血管危险因素的性别差异
Gend Med. 2010 Dec;7(6):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.11.003.
9
Results of a successful telephonic intervention to improve diabetes control in urban adults: a randomized trial.成功的电话干预改善城市成年人糖尿病控制的结果:一项随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):2-7. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1005.
10
Do social inequalities exist in terms of the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, control and monitoring of diabetes? A systematic review.糖尿病的预防、诊断、治疗、控制和监测是否存在社会不平等现象?系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2010 Nov;18(6):572-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00960.x.