Vakil Eli, Lowe Michal, Goldfus Carol
Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
J Learn Disabil. 2015 Sep-Oct;48(5):471-81. doi: 10.1177/0022219413508981. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
Among the various theories proposed to explain developmental dyslexia (DD), the theory of specific procedural learning difficulties has gained certain support and is the framework for the current research. This theory claims that an inability to achieve skill automaticity explains the difficulties experienced by individuals with DD. Previous research on automaticity and DD has exhibited methodological issues such as a failure to test a range of skills. The current study broadens previous findings by delineating various reading skills correlated with several aspects of skill acquisition. Furthermore, the study utilizes two nonverbal tasks that reflect distinct types of skills: Serial Reaction Time (SRT) and the Tower of Hanoi Puzzle (TOHP). A total of 53 children aged 11 to 13 participated in the study, of whom 23 were children with DD and 30 were controls. Participants completed a test battery that consisted of reading tests, the SRT, and the TOHP. Results show no differences in learning rate between individuals with or without DD, although individuals with DD performed both tasks at a slower rate. Correlations were identified between a number of reading measures and measures of skill acquisition, expressed primarily in individuals with DD. Implications are examined in the discussion.
在为解释发育性阅读障碍(DD)而提出的各种理论中,特定程序学习困难理论获得了一定支持,并且是当前研究的框架。该理论声称,无法实现技能自动化可以解释DD患者所经历的困难。先前关于自动化与DD的研究存在方法学问题,例如未能测试一系列技能。当前的研究通过描绘与技能习得的多个方面相关的各种阅读技能,拓宽了先前的研究结果。此外,该研究使用了两项反映不同类型技能的非语言任务:序列反应时(SRT)和河内塔谜题(TOHP)。共有53名11至13岁的儿童参与了该研究,其中23名是DD儿童,30名是对照组。参与者完成了一组测试,包括阅读测试、SRT和TOHP。结果显示,有无DD的个体在学习率上没有差异,尽管DD个体完成两项任务的速度较慢。在一些阅读指标与技能习得指标之间发现了相关性,主要表现在DD个体中。讨论部分对研究结果的意义进行了探讨。