Suppr超能文献

肺叶切除术后胸腔引流管拔除的容积阈值前瞻性随机单盲对照研究。

A prospective randomized single-blind control study of volume threshold for chest tube removal following lobectomy.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China,

出版信息

World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2271-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a new volume threshold for chest tube removal following lobectomy.

METHODS

The prospective randomized single-blind control study included 90 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy or bilobectomy for pathological conditions between March 2012 and September 2012. Eligible patients were randomized into two groups: early removal group (chest tube removal at the drainage volume of 300 ml/24 h or less) and traditional management group (chest tube removal when the drainage volume is less than 100 ml/24 h). Criteria for the early removal group were established and met prior to chest tube removal. The volume and characteristics of drainage, time of drainage tube extraction, and postoperative hospital stay were recorded. All patients received standard care while in the hospital and a follow-up visit was performed 7 days after discharge from hospital.

RESULTS

In accordance with the exit criteria, 20 patients were excluded from the study. The remaining 70 patients included in the final analysis were divided into two groups: early removal group (n = 41) and traditional management group (n = 29). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, comorbidities, and pathological evaluation of resection specimens. In eligible patients (n = 70), the mean volume of drainage 24 h after surgery was 300 ml, while the mean volume of drainage 48 h after surgery was 250 ml. The average daily drainage 48 h after surgery was significantly different than the average daily drainage 24 h after surgery (Z = -2.059, P = 0.039). The mean duration of chest tube placement was 44 h in the early removal group and 67 h in the traditional management group (P = 0.004). Patients who underwent early removal management had a shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to the traditional management group (5 vs. 6 days, P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were observed between the rates of pleural effusion development, thoracentesis, and postoperative complications 1 week after hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

Early removal of the chest tube after lobectomy is feasible and safe and may shorten patient hospital stay and reduce morbidity without the added risk of postoperative complications.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估肺叶切除术后通过新的引流量阈值来拔除胸腔引流管的可行性和安全性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性随机单盲对照研究,纳入了 2012 年 3 月至 2012 年 9 月期间因病理原因接受肺叶切除术或双肺叶切除术的 90 例连续患者。符合条件的患者被随机分为两组:早期拔管组(引流量 300ml/24h 或更少)和传统管理组(引流量<100ml/24h 时拔管)。在拔管前建立并满足早期拔管组的标准。记录引流的体积和特征、引流管拔除时间和术后住院时间。所有患者在住院期间接受标准护理,并在出院后 7 天进行随访。

结果

根据退出标准,20 例患者被排除在研究之外。最终分析纳入 70 例患者,分为早期拔管组(n=41)和传统管理组(n=29)。两组患者的年龄、性别、合并症和切除标本的病理评估无差异。在符合条件的患者(n=70)中,术后 24 小时的平均引流量为 300ml,术后 48 小时的平均引流量为 250ml。术后 48 小时的平均日引流量与术后 24 小时的平均日引流量有显著差异(Z=-2.059,P=0.039)。早期拔管组的胸腔引流管留置时间平均为 44 小时,传统管理组为 67 小时(P=0.004)。与传统管理组相比,早期管理组患者的术后住院时间更短(5 天 vs. 6 天,P<0.01)。出院后 1 周,两组胸腔积液发生率、胸腔穿刺和术后并发症发生率无统计学差异。

结论

肺叶切除术后早期拔除胸腔引流管是可行和安全的,可能缩短患者住院时间和降低发病率,而不会增加术后并发症的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验