Xing Tuo, Li Xukai, Liu Jun, Huang Ying, Wu Shilong, Guo Minzhang, Liang Hengrui, He Jianxing
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Feb;8(4):101. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.111.
Currently, some studies have shown that early removal of a chest tube after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is safe and can shorten the length of hospital stay. The purpose of our study was to retrospectively analyze the association between early chest tube removal and hospital stay in patients who have undergone lobectomy.
This retrospective analysis included patients undergoing different types of lung resections including lobectomy and wedge resection. Consecutive patients who underwent VATS lobectomy or wedge resection (March 2018 to April 2019) for lung tumor were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the drainage time: those in whom the chest tube was removed within 48 hours and the traditional management group.
All 931 patients were included. After propensity score matching (PSM). There are no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Compared with the traditional management group, the hospital stay in the early removal group was significantly shorter (5.05±2.27 7.17±3.03; P<0.001). Regarding complications, compared with the traditional management group, the rates of both lung infection and no complication in the early removal group were less (0.2% 2.3%, 93.0% 91.1%; P=0.005), and the necessity of re-operation was also less (0% 1.2%; P<0.001). Regarding both pleural effusion and thoracentesis, a slight increase in the patient number was observed in the early removal group compared with the traditional management group (4.7% 4.0%, 1.2% 0.9%; P=0.005).
Compared with the traditional management group, early removal of the chest tube after VATS lobectomy and wedge resection is safe and feasible, and could decrease morbidity and postoperative complications, importantly, resulting in a shorter hospital stay.
目前,一些研究表明,电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术后早期拔除胸管是安全的,并且可以缩短住院时间。我们研究的目的是回顾性分析肺叶切除术后患者早期胸管拔除与住院时间之间的关联。
这项回顾性分析纳入了接受不同类型肺切除术(包括肺叶切除术和楔形切除术)的患者。对2018年3月至2019年4月期间因肺肿瘤接受VATS肺叶切除术或楔形切除术的连续患者进行分析。根据引流时间将患者分为两组:胸管在48小时内拔除的患者和传统管理组。
共纳入931例患者。经过倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,两组之间无统计学显著差异。与传统管理组相比,早期拔除组的住院时间明显更短(5.05±2.27对7.17±3.03;P<0.001)。关于并发症,与传统管理组相比,早期拔除组的肺部感染率和无并发症率均较低(0.2%对2.3%,93.0%对91.1%;P=0.005),再次手术的必要性也较低(0%对1.2%;P<0.001)。关于胸腔积液和胸腔穿刺术,与传统管理组相比,早期拔除组的患者数量略有增加(4.7%对4.0%,1.2%对0.9%;P=0.005)。
与传统管理组相比,VATS肺叶切除术和楔形切除术后早期拔除胸管是安全可行的,并且可以降低发病率和术后并发症,重要的是,可缩短住院时间。