• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

服务使用者参与心理健康指南制定的促进因素与障碍:来自荷兰的经验教训。

Facilitators and barriers to service user involvement in mental health guidelines: lessons from the Netherlands.

作者信息

van der Ham Alida J, Shields Laura S, van der Horst Roddy, Broerse Jacqueline E W, van Tulder Maurits W

机构信息

Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Nov;41(6):712-23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0521-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10488-013-0521-5
PMID:24158565
Abstract

This study is the first in-depth qualitative study of service user involvement in the development of multidisciplinary mental health guidelines in the Netherlands. The study comprised a desk study of guidelines (n = 12) and case studies of service user involvement in five guidelines using document analysis, interviews (n = 24) and observations. The desk study shows that all multidisciplinary mental health guidelines have taken service user perspectives into account to some extent. The five guideline case studies led to the identification of ten main themes. Findings will assist guideline developers in making early, informed decisions on involving service users effectively.

摘要

本研究是对荷兰服务使用者参与多学科心理健康指南制定情况进行的首次深入定性研究。该研究包括对指南(n = 12)的案头研究,以及通过文件分析、访谈(n = 24)和观察对服务使用者参与五个指南制定情况的案例研究。案头研究表明,所有多学科心理健康指南都在一定程度上考虑了服务使用者的观点。五个指南案例研究确定了十个主要主题。研究结果将帮助指南制定者就有效让服务使用者参与做出早期明智决策。

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to service user involvement in mental health guidelines: lessons from the Netherlands.服务使用者参与心理健康指南制定的促进因素与障碍:来自荷兰的经验教训。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Nov;41(6):712-23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0521-5.
2
Ten years of multidisciplinary mental health guidelines in the Netherlands.荷兰十年多学科心理健康指南。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;23(4):371-8. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.606538.
3
Service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: a cross-country qualitative study.服务使用者和照护者参与中低收入国家精神卫生系统强化:一项跨国定性研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):29-39. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000634. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
Service user involvement in clinical guideline development and implementation: learning from mental health service users in the UK.服务使用者参与临床指南制定和实施:从英国精神卫生服务使用者中汲取经验。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;23(4):352-7. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.606802.
5
Service user involvement for mental health system strengthening in India: a qualitative study.印度加强精神卫生系统中的服务使用者参与:一项定性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 28;16:269. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0981-8.
6
Service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a rural African setting: qualitative study.服务使用者参与非洲农村地区精神卫生系统强化工作的质性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 18;17(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1352-9.
7
Service user perceptions of involvement in developing NICE mental health guidelines: A grounded theory study.服务使用者对参与制定 NICE 心理健康指南的看法:扎根理论研究。
J Ment Health. 2010 Jun;19(3):249-57. doi: 10.3109/09638230903469202.
8
South African mental health care service user views on priorities for supporting recovery: implications for policy and service development.南非精神卫生保健服务使用者对支持康复重点的看法:对政策和服务发展的启示。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2272-80. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.681005.
9
Mental health policy and mental health service user perspectives on involvement: a discourse analysis.心理健康政策与心理健康服务使用者对参与的看法:一项话语分析
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Aug;59(4):416-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04341.x.
10
Re-inventing care planning in mental health: stakeholder accounts of the imagined implementation of a user/carer involved intervention.重塑心理健康护理计划:利益相关者对一项涉及服务使用者/护理者的干预措施设想实施情况的描述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 30;15:490. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1154-z.

引用本文的文献

1
[Concepts to support dynamic updating processes of guidelines and their practical implementation-Systematic literature review].[支持指南动态更新过程及其实际实施的概念——系统文献综述]
Nervenarzt. 2023 Jul;94(7):594-601. doi: 10.1007/s00115-023-01505-4. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
2
[Challenges and current approaches in the development of psychiatric living guidelines in Germany].[德国精神科生活指南制定中的挑战与当前方法]
Nervenarzt. 2023 Jul;94(7):587-593. doi: 10.1007/s00115-023-01504-5. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.
消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
4
Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Healthcare Guidance: An Overview of Current Methods and Future Challenges.患者及公众参与医疗保健指南制定:当前方法与未来挑战概述
Patient. 2017 Jun;10(3):277-282. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0206-8.