Jin Hei-ying, DU Yong-hong, Wang Xiao-feng, Yao Hang, Wu Kun-lan, Zhang Bei, Zhang Jin-hao
National Center of Colorectal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Integrate Colorectal Oncology Center, Nanjing 210001, China.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;16(10):985-8.
To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy.
Thirty-six patients with low rectal cancer undergoing laproscopic abdominoperineal resection from July 2011 to July 2012 were prospectively enrolled in the study and randomly divided into extraperitoneal colostomy group(EPC, n=18) and internal peritoneal colostomy group(IPC, n=18). Follow-up period was 4-16 (median, 7) months and postoperative complications were compared between two groups.
One case in EPC group was converted to IPC because of poor blood supply of the proximal sigmoid, who was eliminated from the subsequent analysis. Compared with the IPC group, the surgery time was longer in EPC group [(25.3±8.5) min vs. (14.7±6.4) min], while the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Each group had 1 case of stoma ischemia, who both received the colostomy reconstructive surgery. The incidence of stoma edema was significantly higher in EPC group[35.3%(6/17) vs. 0, P<0.05). The early postoperative complications rate did not significantly different between the two groups[58.8%(10/17) vs. 27.8%(5/18), P>0.05]. The late postoperative complications rate was 22.2%(4/18) in IPC group, including 1 case of stoma prolapse, 1 case of stoma stenosis and 2 cases of parastomal hernia. No later postoperative complication occurred in EPC group.
Extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy is an easy and safe procedure with lower late complications as compared to internal peritoneal sigmoid colostomy.
探讨腹腔镜腹膜外乙状结肠造口术的安全性和可行性。
前瞻性纳入2011年7月至2012年7月期间接受腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术的36例低位直肠癌患者,并随机分为腹膜外造口组(EPC,n = 18)和腹膜内造口组(IPC,n = 18)。随访时间为4 - 16个月(中位数为7个月),比较两组术后并发症情况。
EPC组有1例因乙状结肠近端血供差而转为IPC,该病例被排除在后续分析之外。与IPC组相比,EPC组手术时间更长[(25.3±8.5)分钟 vs.(14.7±6.4)分钟],但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。每组各有1例造口缺血,均接受了造口重建手术。EPC组造口水肿发生率明显更高[35.3%(6/17) vs. 0,P<0.05]。两组术后早期并发症发生率差异无统计学意义[58.8%(10/17) vs. 27.8%(5/18),P>0.05]。IPC组术后晚期并发症发生率为22.2%(4/18),包括1例造口脱垂、1例造口狭窄和2例造口旁疝。EPC组未发生术后晚期并发症。
与腹膜内乙状结肠造口术相比,腹膜外乙状结肠造口术操作简便、安全,晚期并发症较少。