Wakefield Bonnie, Drwal Kariann, Scherubel Melody, Klobucar Thomas, Johnson Skyler, Kaboli Peter
1 Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Central Region , VA Office of Rural Health, Iowa City, Iowa.
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Jan;20(1):32-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0079. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) provides significant benefit for persons with cardiovascular disease. However, access to CR services may be limited by driving distance, costs, need for a driver, time away from work, or being a family primary caregiver. The primary aim of the project was to test the reach (i.e., patient and provider uptake), effectiveness (safety and clinical outcomes), and implementation (time and costs) of a remote telephone-based Phase 2 CR program. A secondary aim was to compare outcomes between patients attending the remote program (home-CR) and those attending an on-site program (comparison group).
Subjects were given a choice of the remote or face-to-face program. Remote CR participants (n=48) received education and assessment during 12 weekly by telephone calls. Data were compared with those for face-to-face CR program participants (n=14). Independent t tests and chi-squared tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance models were used to assess differences in outcomes. Costs were analyzed using a cost-minimization analysis.
Of 107 eligible patients, 45 refused participation, 5 dropped out, and 1 died unrelated to the study. Participants had a mean age of 64 (standard deviation 7.5) years. Remote CR participants were highly satisfied with their care and had a higher completion rate (89% of authorized sessions versus 73% of face-to-face). Costs for each program were comparable. There were no significant changes over time in any measured outcome between groups at 12 weeks except medication adherence, which decreased over time in both groups; face-to-face patients reported a greater decrease (p=0.05).
This is the first study to test a remote CR program in a population of older Veterans. Many hospitals do not provide comprehensive CR services on-site; thus remote CR is a viable alternative to bring services closer to the patient.
心脏康复(CR)对心血管疾病患者有显著益处。然而,获得CR服务可能受到驾驶距离、费用、是否需要司机、工作时间以及是否为家庭主要照顾者等因素的限制。该项目的主要目的是测试基于远程电话的第二阶段CR项目的覆盖范围(即患者和提供者的接受程度)、有效性(安全性和临床结果)以及实施情况(时间和成本)。次要目的是比较参加远程项目(家庭CR)的患者与参加现场项目(对照组)的患者的结果。
受试者可选择远程或面对面项目。远程CR参与者(n = 48)在12周内通过电话接受教育和评估。将数据与面对面CR项目参与者(n = 14)的数据进行比较。分别使用独立t检验和卡方检验分析连续变量和分类变量。采用重复测量协方差分析模型评估结果差异。使用成本最小化分析方法分析成本。
107名符合条件的患者中,45人拒绝参与,5人退出,1人因与研究无关的原因死亡。参与者的平均年龄为64岁(标准差7.5)。远程CR参与者对其护理高度满意,完成率更高(授权课程的89%,而面对面为73%)。每个项目的成本相当。除药物依从性外,12周时两组间任何测量结果随时间均无显著变化,两组的药物依从性均随时间下降;面对面组患者下降幅度更大(p = 0.05)。
这是第一项在老年退伍军人人群中测试远程CR项目的研究。许多医院未在现场提供全面的CR服务;因此,远程CR是一种可行的替代方案,可使服务更贴近患者。