Department of Biomedical Engineering, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Jan;40(1):25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
As carotid intra-plaque neovascularization (IPN) is linked to progressive atherosclerotic disease and plaque vulnerability, its accurate quantification might allow early detection of plaque vulnerability. We therefore developed several new quantitative methods for analyzing IPN perfusion and structure. From our analyses, we derived six quantitative parameters-IPN surface area (IPNSA), IPN surface ratio (IPNSR), plaque mean intensity, plaque-to-lumen enhancement ratio, mean plaque contrast percentage and number of micro-vessels (MVN)-and compared these with visual grading of IPN by two independent physicians. A total of 45 carotid arteries with symptomatic stenosis in 23 patients were analyzed. IPNSA (correlation r = 0.719), IPNSR (r = 0.538) and MVN (r = 0.484) were found to be significantly correlated with visual scoring (p < 0.01). IPNSA was the best match to visual scoring. These results indicate that IPNSA, IPNSR and MVN may have the potential to replace qualitative visual scoring and to measure the degree of carotid IPN.
由于颈动脉斑块内新生血管(IPN)与进行性动脉粥样硬化疾病和斑块易损性有关,因此对其进行准确的定量分析可能有助于早期发现斑块易损性。为此,我们开发了几种新的定量方法来分析 IPN 的灌注和结构。我们从分析中得出了六个定量参数——IPN 表面积(IPNSA)、IPN 表面积比(IPNSR)、斑块平均强度、斑块-管腔增强比、平均斑块对比度百分比和微血管数量(MVN)——并将这些参数与两位独立医生对 IPN 的视觉分级进行了比较。共分析了 23 例有症状狭窄的 45 条颈动脉。IPNSA(r=0.719)、IPNSR(r=0.538)和 MVN(r=0.484)与视觉评分呈显著相关(p<0.01)。IPNSA 与视觉评分最为匹配。这些结果表明,IPNSA、IPNSR 和 MVN 可能具有替代定性视觉评分和测量颈动脉 IPN 程度的潜力。