Suppr超能文献

用于预防脑膜炎球菌感染的抗生素。

Antibiotics for preventing meningococcal infections.

作者信息

Zalmanovici Trestioreanu Anca, Fraser Abigail, Gafter-Gvili Anat, Paul Mical, Leibovici Leonard

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Beilinson Campus, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Jabotinski Street, Petah Tikva, Israel, 49100.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 25;2013(10):CD004785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004785.pub5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Meningococcal disease is a contagious bacterial infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis (N. meningitidis). Household contacts have the highest risk of contracting the disease during the first week of a case being detected. Prophylaxis is considered for close contacts of people with a meningococcal infection and populations with known high carriage rates.

OBJECTIVES

To study the effectiveness, adverse events and development of drug resistance of different antibiotics as prophylactic treatment regimens for meningococcal infection.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL 2013, Issue 6, MEDLINE (January 1966 to June week 1, 2013), EMBASE (1980 to June 2013) and LILACS (1982 to June 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs addressing the effectiveness of different antibiotics for: (a) prophylaxis against meningococcal disease; (b) eradication of N. meningitidis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently appraised the quality and extracted data from the included trials. We analysed dichotomous data by calculating the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each trial.

MAIN RESULTS

No new trials were found for inclusion in this update. We included 24 studies; 19 including 2531 randomised participants and five including 4354 cluster-randomised participants. There were no cases of meningococcal disease during follow-up in the trials, thus effectiveness regarding prevention of future disease cannot be directly assessed.Mortality that was reported in one study was not related to meningococcal disease or treatment. Ciprofloxacin (RR 0.04; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.12), rifampin (rifampicin) (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.24), minocycline (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.37) and penicillin (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.94) proved effective at eradicating N. meningitidis one week after treatment when compared with placebo. Rifampin (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.29), ciprofloxacin (RR 0.03; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.42) and penicillin (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.79) still proved effective at one to two weeks. Rifampin was effective compared to placebo up to four weeks after treatment but resistant isolates were seen following prophylactic treatment. No trials evaluated ceftriaxone against placebo but rifampin was less effective than ceftriaxone after one to two weeks of follow-up (RR 5.93; 95% CI 1.22 to 28.68). Mild adverse events associated with treatment were observed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Using rifampin during an outbreak may lead to the circulation of resistant isolates. Use of ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone or penicillin should be considered. All four agents were effective for up to two weeks follow-up, though more trials comparing the effectiveness of these agents for eradicating N. meningitidis would provide important insights.

摘要

背景

脑膜炎球菌病是一种由脑膜炎奈瑟菌引起的传染性细菌感染。在病例被发现的第一周内,家庭接触者感染该病的风险最高。对于脑膜炎球菌感染患者的密切接触者以及已知携带率高的人群,会考虑进行预防治疗。

目的

研究不同抗生素作为脑膜炎球菌感染预防治疗方案的有效性、不良事件及耐药性发展情况。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库2013年第6期、医学索引数据库(1966年1月至2013年6月第1周)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1980年至2013年6月)以及拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学数据库(1982年至2013年6月)。

入选标准

针对不同抗生素的有效性进行的随机对照试验(RCT)或半随机对照试验,用于:(a)预防脑膜炎球菌病;(b)根除脑膜炎奈瑟菌。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估纳入试验的质量并提取数据。我们通过计算每个试验的风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)来分析二分数据。

主要结果

本次更新未发现新的纳入试验。我们纳入了24项研究;其中19项包括2531名随机分组参与者,5项包括4354名整群随机分组参与者。在试验随访期间未出现脑膜炎球菌病病例,因此无法直接评估预防未来疾病的有效性。一项研究中报告的死亡与脑膜炎球菌病或治疗无关。与安慰剂相比,环丙沙星(RR 0.04;95% CI 0.01至0.12)、利福平(RR 0.17;95% CI 0.13至0.24)、米诺环素(RR 0.28;95% CI 0.21至0.37)和青霉素(RR 0.47;95% CI 0.24至0.94)在治疗一周后证明对根除脑膜炎奈瑟菌有效。利福平(RR 0.20;95% CI 0.14至0.29)、环丙沙星(RR 0.03;95% CI 0.00至0.42)和青霉素(RR 0.63;95% CI 0.51至0.79)在一至两周时仍证明有效。与安慰剂相比,利福平在治疗后四周内均有效,但预防性治疗后出现了耐药菌株。没有试验评估头孢曲松与安慰剂的对比情况,但随访一至两周后,利福平的效果不如头孢曲松(RR 5.93;95% CI 1.22至28.68)。观察到与治疗相关的轻度不良事件。

作者结论

在疫情暴发期间使用利福平可能导致耐药菌株的传播。应考虑使用环丙沙星、头孢曲松或青霉素。所有这四种药物在长达两周的随访中均有效,不过更多比较这些药物根除脑膜炎奈瑟菌有效性的试验将提供重要的见解。

相似文献

1
Antibiotics for preventing meningococcal infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 25;2013(10):CD004785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004785.pub5.
2
Antibiotics for preventing meningococcal infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD004785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004785.pub3.
3
Antibiotics for preventing meningococcal infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 10(8):CD004785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004785.pub4.
4
Antibiotics for preventing meningococcal infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD004785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004785.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6:CD013051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013051.pub3.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Translucent colonies and gram-negative diplococci: Meningococcal pneumonia masquerading as pneumonia.
IDCases. 2025 May 12;40:e02265. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2025.e02265. eCollection 2025.
2
Progression of antibiotic resistance in .
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2025 Mar 13;38(1):e0021524. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00215-24. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
7
Susceptibilities of invasive strains to agents used for prophylaxis and to penicillin G.
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2021 Dec 3;6(4):307-312. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2020-0034. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
Molecular characterisation and antibiotic susceptibility of meningococcal isolates from healthy men who have sex with men.
Sex Transm Infect. 2022 Sep;98(6):420-426. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-055173. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
9
Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections: Benefit of Clindamycin, Intravenous Immunoglobulins and Secondary Prophylaxis.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 20;9:697938. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.697938. eCollection 2021.
10
Meningococcal Quinolone Resistance Originated from Several Commensal Species.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jan 27;64(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01494-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotics for preventing meningococcal infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 10(8):CD004785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004785.pub4.
2
Cerebrospinal Meningitis. The Use of Sulphonamide Derivatives in Prophylaxis.
Br Med J. 1940 Dec 21;2(4172):859-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4172.859.
3
Antibiotics for preventing meningococcal infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD004785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004785.pub3.
4
Conjugate vaccines for preventing meningococcal C meningitis and septicaemia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD001834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001834.pub2.
6
Prevention of meningococcal disease.
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Nov 15;72(10):2049-56.
7
Antibiotics for preventing meningococcal infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD004785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004785.pub2.
10
Meningococcal disease--still a major challenge.
Commun Dis Public Health. 2002 Sep;5(3):178-80.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验