Zalmanovici Trestioreanu Anca, Fraser Abigail, Gafter-Gvili Anat, Paul Mical, Leibovici Leonard
Department of Family Medicine, Beilinson Campus, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Jabotinski Street, Petah Tikva, Israel, 49100.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 25;2013(10):CD004785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004785.pub5.
Meningococcal disease is a contagious bacterial infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis (N. meningitidis). Household contacts have the highest risk of contracting the disease during the first week of a case being detected. Prophylaxis is considered for close contacts of people with a meningococcal infection and populations with known high carriage rates.
To study the effectiveness, adverse events and development of drug resistance of different antibiotics as prophylactic treatment regimens for meningococcal infection.
We searched CENTRAL 2013, Issue 6, MEDLINE (January 1966 to June week 1, 2013), EMBASE (1980 to June 2013) and LILACS (1982 to June 2013).
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs addressing the effectiveness of different antibiotics for: (a) prophylaxis against meningococcal disease; (b) eradication of N. meningitidis.
Two review authors independently appraised the quality and extracted data from the included trials. We analysed dichotomous data by calculating the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each trial.
No new trials were found for inclusion in this update. We included 24 studies; 19 including 2531 randomised participants and five including 4354 cluster-randomised participants. There were no cases of meningococcal disease during follow-up in the trials, thus effectiveness regarding prevention of future disease cannot be directly assessed.Mortality that was reported in one study was not related to meningococcal disease or treatment. Ciprofloxacin (RR 0.04; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.12), rifampin (rifampicin) (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.24), minocycline (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.37) and penicillin (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.94) proved effective at eradicating N. meningitidis one week after treatment when compared with placebo. Rifampin (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.29), ciprofloxacin (RR 0.03; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.42) and penicillin (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.79) still proved effective at one to two weeks. Rifampin was effective compared to placebo up to four weeks after treatment but resistant isolates were seen following prophylactic treatment. No trials evaluated ceftriaxone against placebo but rifampin was less effective than ceftriaxone after one to two weeks of follow-up (RR 5.93; 95% CI 1.22 to 28.68). Mild adverse events associated with treatment were observed.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Using rifampin during an outbreak may lead to the circulation of resistant isolates. Use of ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone or penicillin should be considered. All four agents were effective for up to two weeks follow-up, though more trials comparing the effectiveness of these agents for eradicating N. meningitidis would provide important insights.
脑膜炎球菌病是一种由脑膜炎奈瑟菌引起的传染性细菌感染。在病例被发现的第一周内,家庭接触者感染该病的风险最高。对于脑膜炎球菌感染患者的密切接触者以及已知携带率高的人群,会考虑进行预防治疗。
研究不同抗生素作为脑膜炎球菌感染预防治疗方案的有效性、不良事件及耐药性发展情况。
我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库2013年第6期、医学索引数据库(1966年1月至2013年6月第1周)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1980年至2013年6月)以及拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学数据库(1982年至2013年6月)。
针对不同抗生素的有效性进行的随机对照试验(RCT)或半随机对照试验,用于:(a)预防脑膜炎球菌病;(b)根除脑膜炎奈瑟菌。
两位综述作者独立评估纳入试验的质量并提取数据。我们通过计算每个试验的风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)来分析二分数据。
本次更新未发现新的纳入试验。我们纳入了24项研究;其中19项包括2531名随机分组参与者,5项包括4354名整群随机分组参与者。在试验随访期间未出现脑膜炎球菌病病例,因此无法直接评估预防未来疾病的有效性。一项研究中报告的死亡与脑膜炎球菌病或治疗无关。与安慰剂相比,环丙沙星(RR 0.04;95% CI 0.01至0.12)、利福平(RR 0.17;95% CI 0.13至0.24)、米诺环素(RR 0.28;95% CI 0.21至0.37)和青霉素(RR 0.47;95% CI 0.24至0.94)在治疗一周后证明对根除脑膜炎奈瑟菌有效。利福平(RR 0.20;95% CI 0.14至0.29)、环丙沙星(RR 0.03;95% CI 0.00至0.42)和青霉素(RR 0.63;95% CI 0.51至0.79)在一至两周时仍证明有效。与安慰剂相比,利福平在治疗后四周内均有效,但预防性治疗后出现了耐药菌株。没有试验评估头孢曲松与安慰剂的对比情况,但随访一至两周后,利福平的效果不如头孢曲松(RR 5.93;95% CI 1.22至28.68)。观察到与治疗相关的轻度不良事件。
在疫情暴发期间使用利福平可能导致耐药菌株的传播。应考虑使用环丙沙星、头孢曲松或青霉素。所有这四种药物在长达两周的随访中均有效,不过更多比较这些药物根除脑膜炎奈瑟菌有效性的试验将提供重要的见解。