• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管镜检查治疗上尿路结石时使用输尿管鞘并不能提高结石清除率。

The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones.

作者信息

Berquet Gaetan, Prunel Paul, Verhoest Grégory, Mathieu Romain, Bensalah Karim

机构信息

Department of Urology, Pontchaillou University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, 35000, 2 Rue Henri le Guilloux, Rennes, France,

出版信息

World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):229-32. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1181-5. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-013-1181-5
PMID:24166287
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) on stone-free (SF) rate after flexible ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 280 patients who underwent flexible ureteroscopy (URS) for upper urinary tract stone between 2009 and 2012. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether a UAS was used (n = 157) or not (n = 123). SF rate was evaluated at one and three months after surgery by abdominal imaging. Quantitative and qualitative variables were compared with Student's t test and χ2 test, respectively. A logistic regression model was used to determine the predictive factors of SF status.

RESULTS

Stone size was similar in both groups (15.1 vs. 13.7 mm, p = 0.21). SF rates at one and 3 months were comparable in UAS and non-UAS groups (76 vs. 78% and 86 vs. 87%, p = 0.88 and 0.89, respectively). Complication rates were similar in both groups (12.7 vs. 12.1%, p = 0.78). In multivariable analysis, stone size was the only predictive factor of SF rate (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The routine use of a UAS did not improve SF rate in patients undergoing flexible URS for upper urinary tract calculi.

摘要

目的

评估输尿管通路鞘(UAS)对上尿路结石软性输尿管镜检查术后无结石率(SF)的影响。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了2009年至2012年间280例行上尿路结石软性输尿管镜检查(URS)的患者。根据是否使用UAS将患者分为两组(使用组n = 157,未使用组n = 123)。术后1个月和3个月通过腹部影像学评估无结石率。定量和定性变量分别采用Student t检验和χ2检验进行比较。采用逻辑回归模型确定无结石状态的预测因素。

结果

两组结石大小相似(15.1 vs. 13.7 mm, p = 0.21)。UAS组和非UAS组术后1个月和3个月的无结石率相当(分别为76% vs. 78%和86% vs. 87%,p = 0.88和0.89)。两组并发症发生率相似(12.7% vs. 12.1%,p = 0.78)。多变量分析中,结石大小是无结石率的唯一预测因素(p = 0.016)。

结论

对于接受上尿路结石软性URS的患者,常规使用UAS并不能提高无结石率。

相似文献

1
The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones.输尿管镜检查治疗上尿路结石时使用输尿管鞘并不能提高结石清除率。
World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):229-32. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1181-5. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
2
The regular use of calcium channel blockers before flexible URS appears to facilitate primary UAS insertion: a retrospective study in a single center.在输尿管软镜检查(flexible URS)前常规使用钙通道阻滞剂似乎有助于首次输尿管镜鞘(UAS)插入:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Mar;55(3):547-551. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03426-8. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
3
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.体外冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管镜术治疗儿童上尿路结石的对比研究
J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):1-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0313.
4
Gap between UAS and ureteroscope predicts renal stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy with the fragmentation technique.输尿管软镜碎石术中应用间隙预测输尿管软镜取石术的无石率。
World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2733-2739. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03459-7. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
5
Predictors for negative ureteroscopy in the management of upper urinary tract stone disease.上尿路结石病治疗中输尿管镜取石术阴性的预测因素。
Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):748-52. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 May 23.
6
Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study.在有或没有输尿管通路鞘支持的情况下接受治疗的肾结石患者的治疗差异和结局:腔内泌尿外科协会输尿管镜全球研究临床研究办公室
World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):2137-44. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1582-8. Epub 2015 May 14.
7
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy in Preventing Postoperative Infectious Complications of a 14/16F Ureteral Access Sheath with a 12/14F Ureteral Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.在软性输尿管镜碎石术中,比较 14/16F 输尿管鞘与 12/14F 输尿管鞘预防术后感染并发症的安全性和疗效。
J Endourol. 2018 Oct;32(10):923-927. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0222. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
8
Comparison of the Efficacy of ShuoTong Ureteroscopy and Simple Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Ureteral Calculi.硕通输尿管镜与单纯软性输尿管镜治疗单侧输尿管上段结石的疗效比较
Front Surg. 2021 Sep 27;8:707022. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.707022. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones.在软性输尿管镜治疗肾结石中,吸引与传统输尿管导入鞘的比较。
World J Urol. 2019 May;37(5):921-929. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2455-8. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
10
Impact of surgical experience on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for single urinary calculi of the upper urinary tract: a matched-paired analysis of 600 patients.手术经验对上尿路单发尿石症输尿管镜取石率的影响:600例患者的配对分析
J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):78-83. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0301.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy with and without ureteral access sheaths for the treatment of renal calculi: A systematic review and meta-analysis.输尿管镜检查联合激光碎石术治疗肾结石时使用与不使用输尿管鞘的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(2):228-236. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.0196. Epub 2025 May 25.
2
Ureteral access sheath or percutaneous nephrostomy during flexible ureteroscopy: which is better?输尿管软镜检查时输尿管通路鞘与经皮肾造瘘术:哪种更好?
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jan 3;53(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01683-z.
3
Assessing flexible ureteroscopy outcomes for lower Pole versus non lower Pole stones using the flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath: a prospective multicenter study by EAU Endourology and PEARLS group.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery.逆行性肾内手术中输尿管导入鞘插入导致的输尿管壁损伤的前瞻性评估和分类。
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
2
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.软性输尿管镜和激光碎石术治疗 >2cm 的结石:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1257-63. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0217. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
3
Safety and efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for stone disease in obese patients: a systematic review of the literature.
使用可弯曲且可导航的输尿管吸引鞘评估下极结石与非下极结石的软性输尿管镜检查结果:欧洲泌尿外科学会腔内泌尿外科和PEARLS小组的一项前瞻性多中心研究
World J Urol. 2024 Dec 20;43(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05384-5.
4
Utilization of Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.输尿管通道鞘在逆行性肾内手术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 2;60(7):1084. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071084.
5
Comparison of vacuum suction ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and traditional ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted upper ureteral stones.比较经皮肾镜取石术与传统输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效。
World J Urol. 2022 Sep;40(9):2347-2352. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04075-3. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
6
The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study.12/14F 输尿管导引鞘(UAS)使用的困境:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jun 15;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01031-6.
7
Effective ureteral access sheath insertion during flexible ureteroscopy: Influence of the ureteral orifice configuration.软性输尿管镜检查期间有效插入输尿管通路鞘:输尿管口形态的影响
Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Jul;16(7):E375-E380. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7656.
8
The "no-touch" technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones.肾结石软性输尿管镜检查中的“免接触”技术。
J Med Life. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):481-486. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0217.
9
Outcomes with ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a retrospective comparative analysis.逆行性肾内手术中输尿管导入鞘的结果:回顾性对比分析。
Ann Saudi Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;40(5):382-388. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.382. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
10
Controversies associated with ureteral access sheath placement during ureteroscopy.输尿管镜检查中输尿管鞘放置相关的争议。
Investig Clin Urol. 2020 Sep;61(5):455-463. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200278.
经尿道输尿管镜碎石术治疗肥胖患者结石病的安全性和疗效:文献系统评价。
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8 Pt B):E374-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11086.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
4
The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy.输尿管镜术后肾结石碎片的自然史。
Urology. 2011 Mar;77(3):564-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.056. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
5
Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors?新一代软性输尿管肾镜的治疗成功率是否高于其前代产品?
Urol Res. 2011 Jun;39(3):185-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0331-0. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
6
Heterogeneity in the reporting of disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in studies evaluating treatments for nephrolithiasis.评价肾结石治疗方法的研究中,疾病特征和治疗结果报告的异质性。
J Endourol. 2010 Sep;24(9):1411-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0645.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2.
8
Minimally invasive approaches to upper urinary tract urolithiasis.上尿路尿石症的微创治疗方法
Urol Clin North Am. 2008 Aug;35(3):441-54, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2008.05.004.
9
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.输尿管软镜联合激光碎石术治疗多发性单侧肾内结石
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.019. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
10
Effect of medical management on recurrent stone formation following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.药物治疗对经皮肾镜取石术后结石复发形成的影响。
J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1785-8; discussion 1788-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.061.