• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据目前使用的方案,符合主动监测条件的患者出现病理性升级和分期升级。

Pathological upgrading and upstaging of patients eligible for active surveillance according to currently used protocols.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2014 Apr;21(4):377-81. doi: 10.1111/iju.12326. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1111/iju.12326
PMID:24168232
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the ability of six contemporary active surveillance protocols to appropriately select active surveillance candidates among Korean men who underwent radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and December 2011, 1968 patients underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Patients met the criteria for active surveillance according to six currently used criteria, including those from the Johns Hopkins Hospital, the University of Toronto, the University of California at San Francisco, the Prospective Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance, the University of Miami and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. The rates of Gleason score upgrading, upstaging and misclassification at final pathology were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 1006 assessable patients, the percentage of men eligible for active surveillance varied from 13.5% to 38.5%, depending on the criteria used. The rates of upgrading ranged from 41.6% to 50.6%. Extracapsular extension was reported in 4.1% to 8.5% of patients, whereas seminal vesicle invasion was reported in 0.5% to 1.6% of patients. The upstaging rates according to the six active surveillance criteria varied from 4.5% to 9.3%, and the rates of misclassification varied from 44.5% to 54.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available active surveillance criteria might not be suitable in Korean patients with prostate cancer, as they have a high likelihood of underestimating cancer.

摘要

目的

探讨 6 种当代主动监测方案在选择韩国接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性主动监测候选者方面的能力。

方法

2001 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月期间,韩国首尔三星医疗中心有 1968 名患者因前列腺癌接受根治性前列腺切除术。患者符合根据 6 种当前使用的标准进行主动监测的标准,包括约翰霍普金斯医院、多伦多大学、旧金山加利福尼亚大学、前列腺癌前瞻性研究国际主动监测、迈阿密大学和纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心的标准。评估最终病理的 Gleason 评分升级、升级和分类错误率。

结果

在 1006 例可评估患者中,根据所使用的标准,符合主动监测条件的男性比例从 13.5%到 38.5%不等。升级率从 41.6%到 50.6%不等。包膜外延伸率在 4.1%至 8.5%的患者中报告,而精囊侵犯率在 0.5%至 1.6%的患者中报告。根据 6 种主动监测标准的升级率从 4.5%到 9.3%不等,分类错误率从 44.5%到 54.8%不等。

结论

目前可用的主动监测标准可能不适用于韩国前列腺癌患者,因为它们很可能低估癌症。

相似文献

1
Pathological upgrading and upstaging of patients eligible for active surveillance according to currently used protocols.根据目前使用的方案,符合主动监测条件的患者出现病理性升级和分期升级。
Int J Urol. 2014 Apr;21(4):377-81. doi: 10.1111/iju.12326. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
2
Comparison of pathological outcomes of active surveillance candidates who underwent radical prostatectomy using contemporary protocols at a high-volume Korean center.在韩国一家高容量中心,采用当代方案对接受根治性前列腺切除术的主动监测候选者的病理结果进行比较。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov;42(11):1079-85. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys147. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
3
Pathological outcome for Chinese patients with low-risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance and undergoing radical prostatectomy: comparison of six different active surveillance protocols.适合积极监测并接受根治性前列腺切除术的中国低风险前列腺癌患者的病理结果:六种不同积极监测方案的比较
Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Dec;23(6):609-15. doi: 10.12809/hkmj166194. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
4
Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.低危前列腺癌患者符合前列腺癌国际主动监测标准行根治性前列腺切除术的病理和生化结局。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):914-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11658.x. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
5
Validation of active surveillance criteria for pathologically insignificant prostate cancer in Asian men.亚洲男性病理意义不显著前列腺癌主动监测标准的验证
Int J Urol. 2016 Jan;23(1):49-54. doi: 10.1111/iju.12952. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
6
Patient selection and pathological outcomes using currently available active surveillance criteria.使用当前可用的主动监测标准进行患者选择和病理结果评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(4):471-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12154. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
7
Eligibility for active surveillance and pathological outcomes for men undergoing radical prostatectomy in a large, community based cohort.在一个大型社区队列中,接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性进行主动监测的资格和病理结果。
J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.152.
8
Comparative rates of upstaging and upgrading in Caucasian and Korean prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.符合主动监测条件的白种人和韩国前列腺癌患者分期上调和分级上调的比较率
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0186026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186026. eCollection 2017.
9
Pathological findings following radical prostatectomy in patients who are candidates for active surveillance: impact of varying PSA levels.根治性前列腺切除术后行主动监测患者的病理发现:PSA 水平变化的影响。
Asian J Androl. 2011 Nov;13(6):838-41. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.54. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
10
Effects of pathological upstaging or upgrading on metastasis and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinical low-risk prostate cancer.临床低危前列腺癌患者病理性升级或分期升级对转移和癌症特异性死亡的影响。
BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):1003-1009. doi: 10.1111/bju.14418. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The volume of Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer at biopsy predicts unfavorable pathology but not upgrading after radical prostatectomy.活检时Gleason分级1组前列腺癌的体积可预测不良病理结果,但不能预测根治性前列腺切除术后的病理升级。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04641-9.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of Contemporary Selection Criteria in Prostate Cancer Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.当代前列腺癌患者主动监测选择标准的诊断准确性:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;11:810736. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.810736. eCollection 2021.
3
Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort.
在中国队列中分析根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的危险因素。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7772-7780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4274. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
4
The clinical impact of strict criteria for active surveillance of prostate cancer in Korean population: Results from a prospective cohort.韩国人群中前列腺癌主动监测严格标准的临床影响:前瞻性队列研究结果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Jul;62(4):430-437. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200504. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
Low-risk prostate cancer in India: Is active surveillance a valid treatment option?印度的低风险前列腺癌:主动监测是一种有效的治疗选择吗?
Indian J Urol. 2020 Jul-Sep;36(3):184-190. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_37_20. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
6
Establishment and Validation of Extra-transitional Zone Prostate Specific Antigen Density (ETzD), a Novel Structure-based Parameter for Quantifying the Oncological Hazard of Prostates with Enlarged Stroma.建立和验证跨区前列腺特异性抗原密度(ETzD),这是一种基于结构的新参数,用于量化基质增大的前列腺的肿瘤危险度。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 25;9(1):770. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36602-x.
7
Establishment and Application of Prostate Cancer Circulating Tumor Cells in the Era of Precision Medicine.精准医学时代前列腺癌循环肿瘤细胞的建立与应用。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7206307. doi: 10.1155/2017/7206307. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
8
Comparative rates of upstaging and upgrading in Caucasian and Korean prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.符合主动监测条件的白种人和韩国前列腺癌患者分期上调和分级上调的比较率
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0186026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186026. eCollection 2017.
9
An assessment of Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) criteria for active surveillance of clinically low-risk prostate cancer patients.对国际前列腺癌研究组织:临床低风险前列腺癌患者主动监测(PRIAS)标准的评估。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Aug;11(8):238-243. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4093.
10
Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance of Patients with Prostate Cancer in Korea: A Multicenter Analysis of Pathology after Radical Prostatectomy.韩国前列腺癌患者主动监测的选择标准:根治性前列腺切除术后病理的多中心分析。
Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan;50(1):265-274. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.477. Epub 2017 Apr 14.