• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

符合主动监测条件的白种人和韩国前列腺癌患者分期上调和分级上调的比较率

Comparative rates of upstaging and upgrading in Caucasian and Korean prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.

作者信息

Jeon Hwang Gyun, Yoo Jae Ho, Jeong Byong Chang, Seo Seong Il, Jeon Seong Soo, Choi Han-Yong, Lee Hyun Moo, Ferrari Michelle, Brooks James D, Chung Benjamin I

机构信息

Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0186026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186026. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0186026
PMID:29136019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5685613/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of race on the risk of pathological upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy (RP) in an Asian (Korean) and Western (Caucasian) cohort eligible for active surveillance (AS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 854 patients eligible for AS who underwent RP in United States (n = 261) and Korea (n = 593) between 2006 and 2015. After adjusting for age, PSA level, and prostate volume, we utilized multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the effect of race on upgrading or upstaging.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between Caucasian and Korean patients in terms of age at surgery (60.2 yr. vs. 64.1 yr.), PSA density (0.115 ng/mL/mL vs. 0.165 ng/mL/mL) and mean number of positive cores (3.5 vs. 2.4), but not in preoperative PSA values (5.11 ng/mL vs. 5.05 ng/mL). The rate of upstaging from cT1 or cT2 to pT3 or higher was not significantly different between the two cohorts (8.8% vs. 11.0%, P = 0.341). However, there were higher rates of upgrading to high-grade cancer (Gleason 4+3 or higher) in Korean patients (9.1%) when compared to Caucasian counterparts (2.7%) (P = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR 1.07, P < 0.001) and smaller prostate volume (OR 0.97, P < 0.001), but not race, were significantly associated with upstaging or upgrading.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in rates of upgrading or upstaging between Caucasian and Korean men eligible for active surveillance.

摘要

目的

在符合主动监测(AS)条件的亚洲(韩国)和西方(白种人)队列中,研究种族对根治性前列腺切除术(RP)时病理升级和分期上升风险的影响。

材料与方法

我们对2006年至2015年间在美国(n = 261)和韩国(n = 593)接受RP的854例符合AS条件的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。在调整年龄、PSA水平和前列腺体积后,我们采用多因素逻辑回归分析来评估种族对升级或分期上升的影响。

结果

白种人和韩国患者在手术年龄(60.2岁对64.1岁)、PSA密度(0.115 ng/mL/mL对0.165 ng/mL/mL)和阳性核心平均数量(3.5对2.4)方面存在显著差异,但术前PSA值无差异(5.11 ng/mL对5.05 ng/mL)。两个队列中从cT1或cT2分期上升至pT3或更高分期的发生率无显著差异(8.8%对11.0%,P = 0.341)。然而,与白种人患者(2.7%)相比,韩国患者升级为高级别癌症(Gleason 4+3或更高)的发生率更高(9.1%)(P = 0.003)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,年龄(OR 1.07,P < 0.001)和较小的前列腺体积(OR 0.97,P < 0.001),而非种族,与分期上升或升级显著相关。

结论

符合主动监测条件的白种人和韩国男性在升级或分期上升发生率方面无差异。

相似文献

1
Comparative rates of upstaging and upgrading in Caucasian and Korean prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.符合主动监测条件的白种人和韩国前列腺癌患者分期上调和分级上调的比较率
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0186026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186026. eCollection 2017.
2
Racial variation in prostate cancer upgrading and upstaging among men with low-risk clinical characteristics.低危临床特征男性前列腺癌升级和分期上调的种族差异。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):451-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.026. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
3
The impact of race/ethnicity on upstaging and/or upgrading rates among intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.种族/民族对接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的中危前列腺癌患者分期上调和/或升级率的影响。
World J Urol. 2022 Jan;40(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03816-0. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
4
No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance.在低危和有利的中危前列腺癌男性中,阳性家族史对术后升级和分期的不利影响:对主动监测的影响。
World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2499-2506. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03485-5. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
5
Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.基于达米科分类的低风险前列腺癌的异质性:根据主动监测资格在升级和分期进展方面的差异。
Urol Oncol. 2015 Jul;33(7):329.e13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 7.
6
Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.前列腺根治性切除术治疗格里森 6 分有利中危前列腺癌的病理结局:主动监测的意义。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Jun;16(3):226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
7
Incidence of upgrading and upstaging in patients with low-volume Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancers at biopsy: finding a new group eligible for active surveillance.活检时低体积Gleason评分3+4前列腺癌患者的升级和分期上调发生率:发现一组适合主动监测的新患者群体。
Urol Int. 2013;90(3):301-5. doi: 10.1159/000345292. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
8
Differences in the aggressiveness of prostate cancer among Korean, Caucasian, and African American men: A retrospective cohort study of radical prostatectomy.韩国、白种人和非裔美国男性前列腺癌侵袭性的差异:一项前列腺癌根治术的回顾性队列研究。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Jan;34(1):3.e9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
9
Role of Chronic Inflammation as a Predictor of Upstaging/Upgrading in Prostate Cancer: Finding a New Group Eligible for Active Surveillance.慢性炎症作为前列腺癌分期/分级升级的预测因子的作用:寻找适合主动监测的新群体。
Urol J. 2020 Jun 23;17(4):370-373. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5375.
10
Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.低血清睾酮水平预示着前列腺癌根治术后肿瘤分级升高和分期进展。
Asian J Androl. 2016 Jul-Aug;18(4):639-43. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.169984.

引用本文的文献

1
Old men with prostate cancer have higher risk of Gleason score upgrading and pathological upstaging after initial diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年前列腺癌患者初诊后Gleason评分升级和病理分期上调风险更高:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02127-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Incidence and Mortality for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of Temporal Patterns and Trends in 36 Countries.全球前列腺癌发病率和死亡率:36 个国家时间模式和趋势分析。
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):862-874. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.043. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
2
Validation of active surveillance criteria for pathologically insignificant prostate cancer in Asian men.亚洲男性病理意义不显著前列腺癌主动监测标准的验证
Int J Urol. 2016 Jan;23(1):49-54. doi: 10.1111/iju.12952. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
3
Differences in the aggressiveness of prostate cancer among Korean, Caucasian, and African American men: A retrospective cohort study of radical prostatectomy.韩国、白种人和非裔美国男性前列腺癌侵袭性的差异:一项前列腺癌根治术的回顾性队列研究。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Jan;34(1):3.e9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
4
Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prospective, Multi-Institutional Canary PASS Cohort.前瞻性多机构金丝雀前列腺癌主动监测研究(Canary PASS队列)中临床局限性前列腺癌主动监测的结果。
J Urol. 2016 Feb;195(2):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.087. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
5
Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013.1990 - 2013年局限性前列腺癌患者的管理趋势
JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):80-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6036.
6
Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer: The End of Overtreatment?前列腺癌手术治疗方式的变化趋势:过度治疗的终结?
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):175-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
7
Predictive factors of unfavorable prostate cancer in patients who underwent prostatectomy but eligible for active surveillance.前列腺切除术患者符合主动监测条件但具有不利前列腺癌预测因素的研究
Prostate Int. 2014;2(2):70-5. doi: 10.12954/PI.14042. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
8
Prostate volume and biopsy tumor length are significant predictors for classical and redefined insignificant cancer on prostatectomy specimens in Japanese men with favorable pathologic features on biopsy.在经前列腺穿刺活检具有良好病理特征的日本男性中,前列腺体积和活检肿瘤长度是前列腺切除术后标本中经典和重新定义的非显著癌症的重要预测因子。
BMC Urol. 2014 May 29;14:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-43.
9
Prostate cancer risk profiles of Asian-American men: disentangling the effects of immigration status and race/ethnicity.亚裔美国男性的前列腺癌风险特征:解析移民身份和种族/民族的影响。
J Urol. 2014 Apr;191(4):952-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.075. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
10
Pathological upgrading and upstaging of patients eligible for active surveillance according to currently used protocols.根据目前使用的方案,符合主动监测条件的患者出现病理性升级和分期升级。
Int J Urol. 2014 Apr;21(4):377-81. doi: 10.1111/iju.12326. Epub 2013 Oct 29.