University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Genet Sel Evol. 2013 Oct 30;45(1):44. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-44.
Long-term benefits in animal breeding programs require that increases in genetic merit be balanced with the need to maintain diversity (lost due to inbreeding). This can be achieved by using optimal contribution selection. The availability of high-density DNA marker information enables the incorporation of genomic data into optimal contribution selection but this raises the question about how this information affects the balance between genetic merit and diversity.
The effect of using genomic information in optimal contribution selection was examined based on simulated and real data on dairy bulls. We compared the genetic merit of selected animals at various levels of co-ancestry restrictions when using estimated breeding values based on parent average, genomic or progeny test information. Furthermore, we estimated the proportion of variation in estimated breeding values that is due to within-family differences.
Optimal selection on genomic estimated breeding values increased genetic gain. Genetic merit was further increased using genomic rather than pedigree-based measures of co-ancestry under an inbreeding restriction policy. Using genomic instead of pedigree relationships to restrict inbreeding had a significant effect only when the population consisted of many large full-sib families; with a half-sib family structure, no difference was observed. In real data from dairy bulls, optimal contribution selection based on genomic estimated breeding values allowed for additional improvements in genetic merit at low to moderate inbreeding levels. Genomic estimated breeding values were more accurate and showed more within-family variation than parent average breeding values; for genomic estimated breeding values, 30 to 40% of the variation was due to within-family differences. Finally, there was no difference between constraining inbreeding via pedigree or genomic relationships in the real data.
The use of genomic estimated breeding values increased genetic gain in optimal contribution selection. Genomic estimated breeding values were more accurate and showed more within-family variation, which led to higher genetic gains for the same restriction on inbreeding. Using genomic relationships to restrict inbreeding provided no additional gain, except in the case of very large full-sib families.
动物育种计划的长期效益要求遗传改良的增加与保持多样性(由于近交而丧失)的需要相平衡。这可以通过使用最佳贡献选择来实现。高密度 DNA 标记信息的可用性使基因组数据能够纳入最佳贡献选择,但这引发了一个问题,即该信息如何影响遗传改良与多样性之间的平衡。
基于奶牛公牛的模拟和真实数据,研究了在最佳贡献选择中使用基因组信息的效果。我们比较了在使用基于亲本平均值、基因组或后裔测试信息的估计育种值时,在不同的共同亲缘关系限制水平下选择动物的遗传改良。此外,我们估计了估计育种值中由于家庭内差异而导致的变异比例。
最佳基因组估计育种值选择增加了遗传增益。在近交限制政策下,使用基于基因组而不是系谱的共同亲缘关系度量,遗传改良进一步提高。只有当群体由许多大型全同胞家庭组成时,使用基因组而不是系谱关系来限制近交才会产生显著影响;对于半同胞家庭结构,没有观察到差异。在来自奶牛公牛的真实数据中,基于基因组估计育种值的最佳贡献选择允许在低到中度近交水平下进一步提高遗传改良。基因组估计育种值比亲本平均值更准确,并且显示出更多的家庭内变异;对于基因组估计育种值,30%到 40%的变异归因于家庭内差异。最后,在真实数据中,通过系谱或基因组关系限制近交没有差异。
在最佳贡献选择中使用基因组估计育种值增加了遗传增益。基因组估计育种值更准确,显示出更多的家庭内变异,这导致了相同近交限制下的更高遗传增益。使用基因组关系来限制近交没有提供额外的收益,除了在非常大的全同胞家庭的情况下。