Horii Rie, Akiyama Futoshi
Division of Pathology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Breast Cancer. 2016 Jul;23(4):540-5. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0499-6. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
Histological assessment of the therapeutic response to neoadjuvant therapy gives us information regarding the efficacy of a given treatment in individual patients. Such information is useful for guiding selection of appropriate therapeutic strategies after surgery. In many studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer, both the histological therapeutic effect in the primary lesion and the lymph node metastatic status are significantly related to prognosis. The histological assessment of therapeutic response helps determine prognosis in breast cancer treated with NAC; however, methodological problems remain. There are many different histological criteria currently used to assess therapeutic response. Even when the same criteria are used, use of different methods for examination of surgical material can cause different results for the same patient case. When histological therapeutic effect is determined in daily clinical practice, pathologists have to describe the criteria used and their examination methods. Histological criteria for evaluation of therapeutic response and methods for examination of surgical materials after neoadjuvant therapy must be standardized in the near future.
对新辅助治疗的治疗反应进行组织学评估,能为我们提供有关特定治疗对个体患者疗效的信息。此类信息有助于指导术后合适治疗策略的选择。在许多乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NAC)的研究中,原发灶的组织学治疗效果和淋巴结转移状态均与预后显著相关。新辅助化疗治疗的乳腺癌,对其治疗反应的组织学评估有助于判断预后;然而,仍存在方法学问题。目前有许多不同的组织学标准用于评估治疗反应。即使使用相同的标准,对手术标本采用不同的检查方法,对同一病例患者也可能产生不同的结果。在日常临床实践中确定组织学治疗效果时,病理学家必须描述所使用的标准及其检查方法。新辅助治疗后治疗反应评估的组织学标准和手术标本检查方法在不久的将来必须实现标准化。
Breast Cancer. 2016-7
Ann Pathol. 2011-12
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2012
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020