• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过智能手机应用程序提供的行为筛查措施:心理测量特性和用户偏好。

Behavioral screening measures delivered with a smartphone app: psychometric properties and user preference.

作者信息

Bush Nigel E, Skopp Nancy, Smolenski Derek, Crumpton Rosa, Fairall Jonathan

机构信息

National Center for Telehealth and Technology (T2), US Department of Defense, Tacoma, WA.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Nov;201(11):991-5. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000039.

DOI:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000039
PMID:24177488
Abstract

The smartphone is an increasingly widespread technological vehicle for general health and psychological health promotion, evaluation, education, and sometimes intervention. However, the psychometric performance of behavioral health screening measures has not been commonly evaluated for the new, small-format, touch-screen medium. Before mobile-based applications for behavioral health screening can be disseminated confidently, the reliability and the validity of measures administered by the smartphone must be evaluated. We compared psychometric properties (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) of seven behavioral health measures completed on paper, a computer, and an iPhone by 45 army soldiers. The results showed the internal consistencies of the smartphone-delivered measures to be equivalent and very high across all three modalities and the test-retest reliability of the iPhone measures also to be very high. Furthermore, completion of the behavioral screening measures by the iPhone was highly preferred over the other modalities and was reported to be easy and convenient. Our findings help corroborate the use of smartphones and other small mobile devices for behavioral health screening.

摘要

智能手机日益成为促进大众健康和心理健康、进行评估、教育乃至有时实施干预的广泛技术工具。然而,行为健康筛查措施在新的小尺寸触摸屏媒介上的心理测量学表现尚未得到普遍评估。在基于手机的行为健康筛查应用能够放心推广之前,必须评估由智能手机实施的测量方法的可靠性和有效性。我们比较了45名陆军士兵在纸质、计算机和iPhone上完成的七项行为健康测量的心理测量特性(即内部一致性和重测信度)。结果显示,在所有三种方式下,通过智能手机实施的测量方法的内部一致性相当且非常高,iPhone测量方法的重测信度也非常高。此外,与其他方式相比,士兵们非常倾向于通过iPhone完成行为筛查测量,并且报告称这样做轻松便捷。我们的研究结果有助于证实使用智能手机和其他小型移动设备进行行为健康筛查的可行性。

相似文献

1
Behavioral screening measures delivered with a smartphone app: psychometric properties and user preference.通过智能手机应用程序提供的行为筛查措施:心理测量特性和用户偏好。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Nov;201(11):991-5. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000039.
2
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
3
Psychometric comparisons of three measures for assessing motor functions in preschoolers with intellectual disabilities.三种评估智障学龄前儿童运动功能的量表的心理计量学比较。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Jun;56(6):567-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01491.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
4
Psychometric characteristics of a self-report questionnaire (HPIQ) focusing on health promotion interventions in mental health services.一份关注心理健康服务中健康促进干预措施的自填式问卷(HPIQ)的心理测量学特征。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(3):171-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00527.x.
5
Psychometric performance of the National Eye Institute visual function questionnaire in Latinos and non-Latinos.美国国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷在拉丁裔和非拉丁裔人群中的心理测量学表现。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Aug;113(8):1363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.073.
6
eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale.eHEALS:电子健康素养量表。
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27.
7
The smartphone as a platform for wearable cameras in health research.智能手机作为可穿戴相机在健康研究中的平台。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Mar;44(3):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.010.
8
The Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties.腰椎脊柱结局问卷:其编制及心理测量学特性
Spine J. 2007 Jan-Feb;7(1):118-32. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.382. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
9
Alliance With an Unguided Smartphone App: Validation of the Digital Working Alliance Inventory.与非引导式智能手机应用程序结盟:数字工作联盟清单的验证。
Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1331-1345. doi: 10.1177/10731911211015310. Epub 2021 May 18.
10
Caveats of smartphone applications for the cardiothoracic trainee.智能手机应用程序对心胸外科住院医师的警示。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;146(6):1321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.033. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Reasons for non-participation and dropout in a longitudinal study of an app-based support service among adult patients in a psychiatric outpatient setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,针对精神科门诊成年患者开展的一项基于应用程序的支持服务纵向研究中,未参与及退出研究的原因。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 26;16:1470554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1470554. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigating the relationship between media multitasking and executive function within a military population.调查军事人群中媒体多任务处理与执行功能之间的关系。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 May 28;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00634-5.
3
Equivalence of Paper and Smartphone Versions of the Beck Depression Inventory-II.
贝克抑郁量表第二版纸质版与智能手机版的等效性。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 14;14(2):500. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020500.
4
Acceptability, User Satisfaction, and Feasibility of an App-Based Support Service During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Psychiatric Outpatient Setting: Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study.新冠疫情期间精神科门诊环境中基于应用程序的支持服务的可接受性、用户满意度和可行性:前瞻性纵向观察研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 4;8:e60461. doi: 10.2196/60461.
5
A Reflective Thematic Analysis Into the Perceptions of Pregnant Radiographers Regarding the Usefulness of the PregiDose Mobile App to Enhance Fetal Dosimetry and Well-Being: Qualitative Exploration.对孕妇放射技师对使用 PregiDose 移动应用程序增强胎儿剂量测量和幸福感的看法的反思性主题分析:定性探索。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 15;8:e58608. doi: 10.2196/58608.
6
Outcome metrics utilized in evaluations of programs and interventions for combat and operational stress: A review of psychometric properties.评估战斗和作战应激相关项目和干预措施所使用的结果指标:心理测量特性综述。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Mar-Apr;36(2):227-237. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2117537. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
7
Cognitive pediatric tele-assessment: a scoping review.认知儿科远程评估:一项范围综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1288021. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1288021. eCollection 2023.
8
The administration of the paper and electronic versions of the Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is equivalent in people with multiple sclerosis.对于多发性硬化症患者,纸质版和电子版的《手动能力测量量表-36》(MAM-36)及疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)的使用效果相当。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Mar;45(3):1155-1162. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-07103-1. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
9
Differences in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress Scores between Smartphone Version versus Paper Version Administration: Evidence of Equivalence.智能手机版与纸质版在流行病学研究抑郁量表、广泛性焦虑症-7 量表和凯斯勒心理困扰筛查量表评分方面的差异:等效性证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064773.
10
User Behavior of a Publicly Available, Free-to-Use, Self-guided mHealth App for Depression: Observational Study in a Global Sample.一款面向公众、免费使用、自我引导的抑郁症移动健康应用程序的用户行为:全球样本中的观察性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 25;6(10):e35538. doi: 10.2196/35538.