• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在新冠疫情期间,针对精神科门诊成年患者开展的一项基于应用程序的支持服务纵向研究中,未参与及退出研究的原因。

Reasons for non-participation and dropout in a longitudinal study of an app-based support service among adult patients in a psychiatric outpatient setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Kaufmann Luisa, Baldofski Sabrina, Golsong Konstanze, Kohls Elisabeth, Rummel-Kluge Christine

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 26;16:1470554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1470554. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1470554
PMID:40642417
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12241026/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing non-participation in research studies and high dropout rates in research on mental health apps compromise interpretability and generalizability of results. Analyzing underlying reasons holds promise for improving future recruitment methods, study design, and app features.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated reasons for non-participation and dropout among adult psychiatric outpatients in a study examining an app for self-reflection, daily structuring, relaxation, mindfulness, and psychoeducation in Germany during COVID-19 pandemic, as well as potential differences between dropouts and completers.

METHODS

Descriptive statistics on reasons for non-participation using an anonymous questionnaire and for dropout based on semi-structured telephone interviews were performed. Differences between dropouts and completers in sociodemographic, clinical, app-related, and daily mood data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of  = 88 persons approached for potential study participation,  = 57 (64.8%) participated in the app study, while  = 31 (35.2%) declined. Of  = 31 non-participants,  = 29 (93.5%) indicated specific reasons. On average,  = 1.72 ( = 1.03) reasons were provided per non-participant, with no motivation for regular app use ( = 7, 24.1%), no interest in using an app for the presented content ( = 6, 20.7%), and no time for app use ( = 6, 20.7%) being the most common. Of  = 57 study participants,  = 40 (70.2%) were completers and  = 17 (29.8%) were dropouts. On average,  = 2.82 ( = 1.29) dropout reasons were provided per dropout, with too severe health complaints ( = 6, 35.3%), not individually suitable contents ( = 5, 29.4%), and lack of incentives to use the app ( = 5, 29.4%) being the most frequent. Dropouts and completers did not differ significantly in sociodemographic, clinical, and app-related variables (all  > .05). Dropouts reported their mood significantly less often than completers during the first five and seven days of the intervention period (all  < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides exclusive insights into non-participation and dropout in an app study among adults with mental disorders. It identified personal motivation, app-related aspects, no interest in app-based offers, and personal health complaints as common reasons. Suggestions for improving future studies include focusing on incentives, app questionnaires, app installation, user needs analysis, and symptom severity. Early app engagement and adherence measurements (for example number of daily mood reports) may help identify potential dropouts earlier in future studies.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00027536, identifier DRKS00027536.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac59/12241026/1cbdaff15370/fpsyt-16-1470554-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac59/12241026/588d91de9bb3/fpsyt-16-1470554-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac59/12241026/1cbdaff15370/fpsyt-16-1470554-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac59/12241026/588d91de9bb3/fpsyt-16-1470554-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac59/12241026/1cbdaff15370/fpsyt-16-1470554-g002.jpg
摘要

背景

参与研究的人数不断减少以及心理健康应用程序研究中的高辍学率,影响了研究结果的可解释性和普遍性。分析潜在原因有望改进未来的招募方法、研究设计和应用程序功能。

目的

本研究调查了德国新冠疫情期间一项针对成人精神科门诊患者的应用程序研究中不参与和退出的原因,该应用程序用于自我反思、日常规划、放松、正念和心理教育,同时还研究了退出者和完成者之间的潜在差异。

方法

使用匿名问卷对不参与原因进行描述性统计,并基于半结构化电话访谈对退出原因进行描述性统计。分析了退出者和完成者在社会人口统计学、临床、应用程序相关和日常情绪数据方面的差异。

结果

在被邀请参与潜在研究的88人中,57人(64.8%)参与了应用程序研究,而31人(35.2%)拒绝参与。在31名未参与者中,29人(93.5%)表明了具体原因。每位未参与者平均提供1.72个(标准差=1.03)原因,其中最常见的是没有定期使用应用程序的动机(7人,24.1%)、对所呈现内容使用应用程序不感兴趣(6人,20.7%)以及没有时间使用应用程序(6人,20.7%)。在57名研究参与者中,40人(70.2%)是完成者,17人(29.8%)是退出者。每位退出者平均提供2.82个(标准差=1.29)退出原因,其中最常见的是健康问题过于严重(6人,35.3%)、内容不适合个人(5人,29.4%)以及缺乏使用应用程序的激励措施(5人,29.4%)。退出者和完成者在社会人口统计学、临床和应用程序相关变量方面没有显著差异(所有p>.05)。在干预期的前五天和七天内,退出者报告情绪的频率明显低于完成者(所有p<.001)。

结论

本研究提供了关于精神障碍成年人应用程序研究中不参与和退出的独特见解。它确定了个人动机、应用程序相关方面、对基于应用程序的服务不感兴趣以及个人健康问题是常见原因。对改进未来研究的建议包括关注激励措施、应用程序问卷、应用程序安装、用户需求分析和症状严重程度。早期的应用程序参与度和依从性测量(例如每日情绪报告的数量)可能有助于在未来研究中更早地识别潜在的退出者。

临床试验注册

https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00027536,标识符DRKS00027536。

相似文献

1
Reasons for non-participation and dropout in a longitudinal study of an app-based support service among adult patients in a psychiatric outpatient setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,针对精神科门诊成年患者开展的一项基于应用程序的支持服务纵向研究中,未参与及退出研究的原因。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 26;16:1470554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1470554. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.针对大麻使用障碍的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 5;2016(5):CD005336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub4.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
7
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
8
Impact of a Symptom Checker App on Patient-Physician Interaction Among Self-Referred Walk-In Patients in the Emergency Department: Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Randomized, Controlled Trial.症状检查应用程序对急诊科自行前来就诊患者中患者与医生互动的影响:多中心、平行组、随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 2;27:e64028. doi: 10.2196/64028.
9
Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders.精神障碍患者随机试验中的对照干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):MR000050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000050.pub2.
10
Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.为改善孕产妇和新生儿结局而激励女性增加产前检查的使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 15;2015(12):CD009916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009916.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptability, User Satisfaction, and Feasibility of an App-Based Support Service During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Psychiatric Outpatient Setting: Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study.新冠疫情期间精神科门诊环境中基于应用程序的支持服务的可接受性、用户满意度和可行性:前瞻性纵向观察研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 4;8:e60461. doi: 10.2196/60461.
2
Reasons for non-participation of children and adolescents in a large-scale school-based mental health project.儿童和青少年不参与大规模学校心理健康项目的原因。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;11:1294862. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1294862. eCollection 2023.
3
Additive effects of adjunctive app-based interventions for mental disorders - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
基于应用程序的精神障碍辅助干预措施的累加效应——随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Internet Interv. 2023 Dec 18;35:100703. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100703. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
m-Path: an easy-to-use and highly tailorable platform for ecological momentary assessment and intervention in behavioral research and clinical practice.m-Path:一个易于使用且高度可定制的平台,用于行为研究和临床实践中的生态瞬时评估与干预。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Oct 18;5:1182175. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1182175. eCollection 2023.
5
Predictors of Dropout Among Psychosomatic Rehabilitation Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Secondary Analysis of a Longitudinal Study of Digital Training.新冠疫情期间身心康复患者辍学的预测因素:数字化培训纵向研究的二次分析
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 27;25:e43584. doi: 10.2196/43584.
6
Time trends in mental health indicators in Germany's adult population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.德国成年人在 COVID-19 大流行前后的心理健康指标的时间趋势。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;11:1065938. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1065938. eCollection 2023.
7
E-mental health implementation in inpatient care: Exploring its potential and future challenges.住院护理中的电子心理健康实施:探索其潜力与未来挑战。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Dec 14;4:1027864. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1027864. eCollection 2022.
8
Determinants of Stress Levels and Behavioral Reactions in Individuals With Affective or Anxiety Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Russia.俄罗斯新冠疫情期间情感障碍或焦虑症患者压力水平及行为反应的决定因素
Front Sociol. 2022 Jul 5;7:870421. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.870421. eCollection 2022.
9
Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review.影响移动医疗应用程序用于预防或管理非传染性疾病的依从性的因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 25;24(5):e35371. doi: 10.2196/35371.
10
Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review.使用移动健康应用程序在参与者参与度和留存率方面面临的挑战:文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 26;24(4):e35120. doi: 10.2196/35120.