Boris Böll, Bastian von Tresckow, Dennis A. Eichenauer, Stephanie Sasse, Michael Fuchs, Karolin Behringer, Beate C. Klimm, Andreas Engert, and Peter Borchmann, University Hospital Cologne; Boris Böll, Helen Goergen, Bastian von Tresckow, Dennis A. Eichenauer, Stephanie Sasse, Michael Fuchs, Karolin Behringer, Beate C. Klimm, Volker Diehl, Andreas Engert, and Peter Borchmann, German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne; Nils Arndt and Ralph Naumann, Stiftungsklinikum Mittelrhein, Koblenz; Julia Meissner, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg; Stefan W. Krause, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen; and Roland Schnell, Pioh Medical Oncology and Hematology, Frechen, Germany.
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 10;31(35):4431-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.8246. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
Progression or relapse of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is common among older patients. However, prognosis and effects of second-line treatment are thus far unknown.
We investigated second-line treatment and survival in older patients with progressive or relapsed HL. Patients treated within German Hodgkin Study Group first-line studies between 1993 and 2007 were screened for refractory disease or relapse (RR-HL). Patients with RR-HL age ≥ 60 years at first-line treatment were included in this analysis.
We identified 105 patients (median age, 66 years); 28%, 31%, and 41% had progressive disease, early relapse, or late relapse, respectively. Second-line treatment strategies included intensified salvage regimens (22%), conventional polychemotherapy and/or salvage-radiotherapy with curative intent (42%), and palliative approaches (31%). Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 12 months; OS at 3 years was 31% (95% CI, 22% to 40%). A prognostic score with risk factors (RFs) of early relapse, clinical stage III/IV, and anemia identified patients with favorable and unfavorable prognosis (≤ one RF: 3-year OS, 59%; 95% CI, 44% to 74%; ≥ two RFs: 3-year OS, 9%; 95% CI, 1% to 18%). In low-risk patients, the impact of therapy on survival was significant in favor of the conventional polychemotherapy/salvage radiotherapy approach. In high-risk patients, OS was low overall and did not differ significantly among treatment strategies.
OS in older patients with RR-HL can be predicted using a simple prognostic score. Poor outcome in high-risk patients cannot be overcome by any of the applied treatment strategies. Our results might help to guide treatment decisions and evaluate new compounds in these patients.
霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)在老年患者中常发生进展或复发。然而,目前尚不清楚二线治疗的预后和效果。
我们研究了进展或复发 HL 老年患者的二线治疗和生存情况。筛选了 1993 年至 2007 年期间德国霍奇金研究组一线研究中难治性疾病或复发(RR-HL)的患者接受二线治疗。在一线治疗时年龄≥60 岁的 RR-HL 患者纳入本分析。
共纳入 105 例患者(中位年龄 66 岁);分别有 28%、31%和 41%的患者发生进行性疾病、早期复发和晚期复发。二线治疗策略包括强化挽救方案(22%)、常规联合化疗和/或挽救性放疗(42%)和姑息治疗(31%)。全组中位总生存(OS)为 12 个月;3 年 OS 为 31%(95%CI,22%至 40%)。具有早期复发、临床分期 III/IV 期和贫血等危险因素(RFs)的预后评分可识别预后良好和不良的患者(≤一个 RF:3 年 OS,59%;95%CI,44%至 74%;≥两个 RF:3 年 OS,9%;95%CI,1%至 18%)。在低危患者中,常规联合化疗/挽救性放疗的生存获益具有显著统计学意义。在高危患者中,OS 总体较低,不同治疗策略之间无显著差异。
RR-HL 老年患者的 OS 可以使用简单的预后评分预测。高危患者的不良预后无法通过任何应用的治疗策略克服。我们的结果可能有助于指导这些患者的治疗决策和评估新化合物。